Mishra, SK (2017): Almost equimarginal principle based composite index of globalization: China, India and Pakistan.

PDF
MPRA_paper_81835.pdf Download (305kB)  Preview 
Abstract
The present study proposes an alternative method to construct an index of globalization which is based on the principle of almost equimarginal contributions (AEMC) or Shapley values of the constituent variables to the overall index rather than the correlation coefficients among the constituent variables and the overall index (the KOF index based on the principal component scores). This has been done by minimization of the Euclidean norm of the Shapley values of the constituent variables. As an exercise, secondary time series data (19702013) on the measures of globalization in three different dimensions (economic, social and political) of three economies (China, India and Pakistan) have been used. A comparison of the AEMC index with the KOF index reveals that while the former is more inclusive, the latter is more elitist in matters of inclusion of the weakly correlated constituent variables in the overall (composite) index. As a consequence, the AEMC index is more sensitive than the KOF index of globalization. Both indices capture the trends in globalization in the countries under study and are highly correlated between themselves. Thus, AEMC is an alternative or perhaps a better method to construct composite indices.
Item Type:  MPRA Paper 

Original Title:  Almost equimarginal principle based composite index of globalization: China, India and Pakistan 
Language:  English 
Keywords:  Globalization; KOF index; equimarginal; Shapley value; global optimization; China; India; Pakistan 
Subjects:  C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4  Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C43  Index Numbers and Aggregation C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6  Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61  Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis C  Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7  Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C71  Cooperative Games F  International Economics > F6  Economic Impacts of Globalization > F60  General P  Economic Systems > P5  Comparative Economic Systems > P52  Comparative Studies of Particular Economies 
Item ID:  81835 
Depositing User:  Sudhanshu Kumar Mishra 
Date Deposited:  11 Oct 2017 17:01 
Last Modified:  27 Sep 2019 11:46 
References:  Andersen, T.M. and Herbertsson, T.T. (2005). Quantifying Globalization. Applied Economics, 37 (10):10891098. Bhandari, A.K. and Heshmati, A. (2005). Measurement of globalization and its variations among countries, regions and over time. IZA Discussion Paper No. 1578. http://ftp.iza.org/dp1578.pdf (visited 5/10/2017). Caselli, M. (2012).Trying to Measure Globalization: Experiences, critical issues and perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht. Dreher, A. (2006). Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a new Index of Globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10): 10911110. Dreher, A., Gaston, N. and Martens, P. (2008). Measuring Globalisation: Gauging its Consequences. Springer. New York. Grinin, L., Ilyin, I. and Korotayev, A. (2012, editors). Globalistics and Globalization Studies. Journal of Glabalization Studies. Volgograd, Russia. Hayek, F.A. (1944). The Road to Serfdom. Routledge, London. Hayek, F.A. (1988). The Fatal Conceit: The Errors of Socialism. Routledge, London. Kakar, Z.K., Khilji, B.A. and Khan, M.J. (2011). Globalization and Economic Growth: Evidence from Pakistan. Acta Universitatis Danubius, 7(3):208217. Mishra, S.K. (2013). Global Optimization of Some Difficult Benchmark Functions by HostParasite Coevolutionary Algorithm", Economics Bulletin, 33(1): 118. Mishra, S.K. (2016). A Note on Construction of a Composite Index by Optimization of Shapley Value Shares of the Constituent Variables. Turkish Economic Review, 3(3):466472. Mishra, S.K. and Kumar, B. (2013). Disparities in globalization of the world economies. The NEHU Journal, 11(1): 117. Mishra, S.K. and Nayak, P. (2006). Socioeconomic dimensions of globalization in India. Journal of Managerial Economics, 5(1): 6380. OECD (2005): Measuring Globalisation: OECD Handbook on Economic Globalisation Indicators. http://www.oecd.org/sti/ind/measuringglobalisation.htm (visited 5/10/2017). Roth, A.E. (1988). The Shapley Value. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York. Xue, J., Luo, C. and Li, S. (2014). Globalization, Liberalization and Income Inequality: The Case of China. Singapore Economic Review, 59(1):121. Yoganandan, G. (2010). Globalisation of Pakistan: Lessons for Politically Unstable Countries. International Journal of Marketing Studies, 2(1):133139. Zubok, V.M. (2009). A Failed Empire: The Soviet Union in the Cold War from Stalin to Gorbachev. Univ of North Carolina Press. NC, USA. 
URI:  https://mpra.ub.unimuenchen.de/id/eprint/81835 