Mishra, SK (2017): Trends in Globalization of Select Asian Countries.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_82791.pdf Download (407kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In this study we have constructed a composite index of globalization of select Asian countries during 1970-2014 by minimizing the Euclidean norm of Shapley values of indicator variables contributing to the overall index. As a consequence, the mean expected marginal contributions of constituent variables to the overall index are approximately equal and thus, the overall composite index represents the constituent variables optimally. We call this index the Almost Equal Marginal Contribution (AEMC) index. We find that AEMC index and the KOF index of globalization are highly correlated (Pearson’s r=0.982). We find that Singapore, Cyprus, Israel, Qatar, Malaysia, Jordan, Lebanon, Turkey, Kuwait, Bahrain and Japan have done very well and scored above 0.7. At the other end, Yemen, Tajikistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Iran, Nepal and Myanmar have scored below 0.5. Trends in globalization are increasing in general, but the rate of globalization, which accelerated after 1991, lost is momentum after 2007. Disparities in globalization, as measured by Gini coefficient over the countries under study, were more or less constant up to 1985 but after that they started declining.
We have found that the index of globalization goes well with other socio-economic measures such as Economic Freedom Index, International Innovation Index, Social Progress Index, Human Development Index and Corruption Perception Index, showing high values of Kendall’s Tau and Spearman’s Rho. Its association with Democracy Index is rather weak but positive. It is almost uncorrelated with the Gender Gap Index. We observe, therefore, that globalization index is moving well with the indices of socio-economic condition in the Asian countries.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Trends in Globalization of Select Asian Countries |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Globalization; Synthetic index; Asian countries; Shapley values; Equi-marginal contribution, Lee thesis |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C43 - Index Numbers and Aggregation C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C71 - Cooperative Games F - International Economics > F0 - General > F02 - International Economic Order and Integration F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F60 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O53 - Asia including Middle East |
Item ID: | 82791 |
Depositing User: | Sudhanshu Kumar Mishra |
Date Deposited: | 19 Nov 2017 18:50 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 19:48 |
References: | Alfaro, L., Kalemli-Ozcan, S. and Vadym Volosovych, V. (2005). Why doesn’t Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries? An Empirical Investigation. http://www.people.hbs.edu/lalfaro/lucas.pdf Becker, W., Saisana, M. Paruolo, P. and Vandecasteele, I. (2017). Weights and importance in composite indicators: Closing the gap. Ecological Indicators, 80(): 12-22. Dreher, A. (2006). Does Globalization Affect Growth? Evidence from a new Index of Globalization. Applied Economics, 38(10): 1091-1110. Dreher, A., Gaston, N. and Martens, P. (2008). Measuring Globalisation: Gauging its Consequences. Springer. New York. Economist, The (2011). Income equality. http://www.economist.com/node/18587127, April 20. Economist, The (2015). The rich are always with us: But we don’t like them that much. www.economist.com/news/special-report/21657611-we-dont-them-much-rich-are-always-us. Special Report, July 16. Economist, The (2015).Democracy Index 2015: Democracy in an age of anxiety. Intelligence Unit. https://www.yabiladi.com/img/content/EIU-Democracy-Index-2015.pdf Feldstein, M. and Horioka, C. (1980). Domestic Saving and International Capital Flows. Economic Journal 90(358): 314–329. Hindu, The (2000). Are we a soft state? www.thehindu.com/2000/08/29/stories/13290831.htm. Aug. 29, 2000. Knutsen, C.H. (2010). Investigating the Lee thesis: how bad is democracy for Asian economies? European Political Science Review, 2(3):451-473. Libman, A. (2008). Democracy and growth: is the effect non-linear? Munich Personal RePEc Archive https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/17795/1/MPRA_paper_17795.pdf Lucas, R. (1990). Why doesn't Capital Flow from Rich to Poor Countries? American Economic Review 80 (2):92–96. Maharatna, A. (2010). In resurrection of Gunnar Myrdal’s Asian Drama. Mainstream Weekly 48(18), April 24 2010. https://mainstreamweekly.net/article2035.html Mishra, S.K. (2014). What Happens If in the Principal Component Analysis the Pearsonian is Replaced by the Brownian Coefficient of Correlation? SSRN. http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2443362 Mishra, S.K. (2016). A Note on Construction of a Composite Index by Optimization of Shapley Value Shares of the Constituent Variables. Turkish Economic Review, 3(3):466-472. Mishra, S.K. (2017a). Globalization under Hysteresis: A Study of Eastern Bloc Countries, China and India. Working Paper-81962. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/81962/1/MPRA_paper_81962.pdf Mishra, S.K. (2017b). Measuring Degree of Globalization of African Countries on Almost Equimarginal Contribution Principle. https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/82614/1/MPRA_paper_82614.pdf Mishra, S.K. and Kumar, B. (1913). Disparities in globalization of the world economies. The NEHU Journal, 11(1): 1-17. Morgenstern, O. (1962). On the accuracy of national income and growth statistics. Econometric Research Program, Research Memo #43, U.S.A. http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/285065.pdf. Myrdal, G. (1970).The Challenge of World Poverty, Penguin, London. Myrdal, G. (1972). Asian Drama: An Inquiry into the Poverty of Nations. (Abridged version by S.S. King of The Twentieth Century Fund Study). Vintage Books, New York. Putnam, R.D. (1995). Bowling Alone: America's Declining Social Capital. Journal of Democracy. 6 (1): 65–78. Putnam, R.D. (2000). Bowling Alone: The Collapse and Revival of American Community. Simon & Schuster, New York. Reddit.com (2014). Wealth Inequality in Brunei. A discussion initiated on Reddit come on 13. 2014. reddit.com/r/Brunei/comments/25fhrt/wealth_inequality_in_brunei. The information is attributed to http://www.depd.gov.bn/MDG/Downloads/Laporan_MDG_NBD_2010_Mal.pdf Roth, A.E. (1988). The Shapley Value. Cambridge Univ. Press, New York. Rudra, A. (1989). Emergence of the Intelligentsia as a Ruling Class in India. Economic and political Weekly, 24(3): 142-50. Samimi, P. (2011). Globalization Measurement: Notes on Common Globalization Indexes. www.scientificpapers.org/wp-ntent/files/1216_Parisa_Samimi_Globalization_Measurement_Notes_ on_Common_Globalization_Indexes.pdf Somarriba, N. and Pena, B. (2009). Synthetic Indicators of Quality of Life in Europe. Social Indicators Research. 94(1): 115–133. States Times Review (2017). Statistics: Singapore’s income inequality among the worst in the world. https://statestimesreview.com/2017/02/16/statistics-singapores-income-inequality-among-the-worst-in-the-world/ Vujakovic, P. (2010). How to Measure Globalisation? A New Globalisation Index (NGI). Atlantic Economic Journal, 38(2): 237-237. http://www.fiw.ac.at/fileadmin/Documents/Veranstaltungen/ Forschungskonferenz/3._foko/Paper_der_Vortragenden/47.PetraVujakovic.New_Globalisation_Index.pdf |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/82791 |