Wolton, Stephane (2018): Signaling in the shadow of conflict.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_83971.pdf Download (381kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Informational asymmetries have long been recognized as one of the causes of wasteful conflicts. Signaling has been found to be an effective tool for interested parties to truthfully communicate private information. Can signaling help reduce the risk of conflict? I study this question in a model in which a Sender sends a signal about his privately known cost of conflict, a Receiver makes an offer, and the Sender decides whether or not to start a conflict. I find that an equilibrium with no conflict exists only if the outcome of conflict depends on the Receiver's offer and the Sender's possible costs are sufficiently apart. Importantly, these conditions are never satisfied in the context of wars where belligerents obtain all or none of a dispute territory. In such context, no information is ever transmitted in equilibrium. Overall, this paper establishes that the shadow of conflict renders signaling quite ineffective to resolve informational asymmetry.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Signaling in the shadow of conflict |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | war, plea bargain, lobbying, conflict, signaling, information |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D70 - General D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D74 - Conflict ; Conflict Resolution ; Alliances ; Revolutions D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D80 - General D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness |
Item ID: | 83971 |
Depositing User: | Stephane Wolton |
Date Deposited: | 19 Jan 2018 02:37 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 14:17 |
References: | Arena, Philip. 2013. ``Costly Signaling, Resolve, and Martial Effectiveness." Working paper. Baliga, Sandeep and Tomas Sjostrom. 2004. ``Arms Races and Negotiations.'' The Review of Economic Studies, 71(2): 351–369. Baliga, Sandeep, and Tomas Sjostrom. 2013. ``Bargaining and War: A Review of Some Formal Models." Korean Economic Review 29(2): 235-266. Banks, Jeffrey S. 1990. ``Equilibrium behavior in crisis bargaining games." American Journal of Political Science 34(3): 599-614. Horner, Johannes, Massimo Morelli, and Francesco Squintani. 2015. ``Mediation and peace." The Review of Economic Studies 82(4): 1483-1501. Kydd, Andrew H. 2005. Trust and mistrust in international relations. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Mailath, George J. 1987. ``Incentive compatibility in signaling games with a continuum of types." Econometrica 55(6): 1349-1365. Meirowitz, Adam, Massimo Morelli, Kristopher W. Ramsay, and Francesco Squintani. 2017. ``Dispute resolution institutions and strategic militarization." Journal of Political Economy, forthcoming. Ramsay, Kristopher W. 2017. ``Information, Uncertainty, and War." Annual Review of Political Science 20: 505-527. Silveira, Bernardo S. 2017. ``Bargaining With Asymmetric Information: An Empirical Study of Plea Negotiations." Econometrica 85(2): 419-452. Wolton, Stephane. 2017. ``Lobbying, inside and out: how special interest groups influence policy choices." LSE Working paper. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/83971 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Signaling in the shadow of conflict. (deposited 14 Jan 2018 02:31)
- Signaling in the shadow of conflict. (deposited 19 Jan 2018 02:37) [Currently Displayed]