Axelrod, David (2017): Optimizing Discount Rates: Expressing Preferences for Sustainable Outcomes in Present Value Calculations. Published in: Journal of Applied Business and Economics , Vol. 19, No. 1 (2017): pp. 9-19.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_84408.pdf Download (676kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper describes how the discount rate used in present value calculations expresses the preference for sustainability in decision making, and its implication for sustainable economic growth. In essence, the lower the discount rate, the greater the regard for the future, and the more likely we choose behaviors that lead to long-term sustainability. The theoretical framework combines behavioral economics and holonomics, which involve limitations of regard for the future due to constraints on processing uncertainty. An alternative formulation for present value calculations, which includes a survival function, is developed. A taxonomy of institutions based on discount rate is proposed.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Optimizing Discount Rates: Expressing Preferences for Sustainable Outcomes in Present Value Calculations |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Discount Rate, Regard, Sustainability, Present Value, Holonomics, Certainty, Behavioral Economics |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B5 - Current Heterodox Approaches > B59 - Other D - Microeconomics > D0 - General > D03 - Behavioral Microeconomics: Underlying Principles D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice |
Item ID: | 84408 |
Depositing User: | Dr. David Axelrod |
Date Deposited: | 17 Feb 2018 14:12 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 10:21 |
References: | Ainsle, G. (1986). Beyond Microeconomics: Conflict Among Interests in a Multiple Self as a Determinant of Value. The Multiple Self, ed. J. Elster, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 133 – 175. Axelrod, D. (1990). The Rationality of Positive Time Preference. Three Essays on Latency in Economics and Decision Making, Doctoral Dissertation. Becker, G. (1976). The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Bohm-Bawerk, E. von (1959). Capital and Interest Vol.II, Libertarian Press, South Holland. Borrisov, K. and Dubey, R. (2015). A Characterization of Ramsey Equilibrium in a Model with Limited Borrowing. Journal of Mathematical Economics, 56 (2015), 67-78. Feldstein, M. (1974). The Social Time Preference Rate. Cost-Benefit Analysis: Selected Readings, ed. Layard, R., Penguin Books, Baltimore. Fishburn, P. and Rubinstein, A. (1982). Time Preference. International Economic Review, 23(3), 677 -694 Fisher, I. (1930). The Theory of Interest, The Macmillan Company, New York. Frank, R. (1987). If Homo Economicus Could Choose His Own Utility Function, Would He Want One with a Conscience?. American Economic Review, 77(4), 593 – 604. Fuerst, O. and Geiger, U. (2003). From Concept to Wall Street: A Complete Guide to Entrepreneurship and Venture Capital. Financial Times Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ. Gigliotti, G. A. (1988). The Conflict between Naive and Sophisticated Choice as a Form of the Liberal Paradox. Theory and Decision, 24(1), 35 – 42. Goldman, S. (1980). Consistent Plans, Review of Economic Studies, 47, 533 – 537. Hammond, P. J. (1976). Endogenous Tastes and Stable Long-Run Choice. Journal of Economic Theory, 13, 329 – 340. Inter-American Development Bank. Economic Analysis Overview - Assumptions and Methodologies. Retrieved September 10, 2016, from http://www.iadb.org/en/topics/developmenteffectiveness/ evaluation-hub/economic-analysis-overview-assumptions-and-methodologies,17882.html Laajaj, R. (2012). Closing the eyes on a gloomy future: Psychological causes and economic consequences. Pacific Development Economics Conference, University of California, Davis. Markowitz, H. (1959). Portfolio Selection. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. Miller, R. (1981). Survival Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York. Lyons, Oren (1980). An Iroquois Perspective. American Indian Environments: Ecological Issues in Native American History. Vecsey C, Venables RW (Editors). New York: Syracuse University Press, 173-174. Podenza, R. (2011). Sustainability and the Discount Rate: An Economist’s Perspective. https://osbsustainablefuture.org/the-long-view-archives/home/section-newsletter/20114winter1pozdena Robinson, S. and Robinson, M. (2014). Holonomics, Floris Books, Edinburgh. Strathman, A., Gleicher, F., Boninger, D. S., & Edwards, C. S. (1994). The consideration of future consequences: Weighing immediate and distant outcomes of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66(4), 742-752. Strotz, R. H. (1955–56). Myopia and Inconsistency in Dynamic Utility Maximization. Review of Economic Studies 23(3): 165–180. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/84408 |