A multi-dimensional measure of environmental behavior: Exploring the predictive power of connectedness to nature, ecological worldview and environmental concern

Halkos, George and Gkargkavouzi, Anastasia and Matsiori, Steriani (2018): A multi-dimensional measure of environmental behavior: Exploring the predictive power of connectedness to nature, ecological worldview and environmental concern.

Abstract

In this study we examine the multi-dimensional structure of environmental behavior and its potential domains. Factor analysis reveal six behavioral domains: civic actions, policy support, recycling, transportation choices, behaviors in a household setting and consumerism. We use the Connectedness to Nature and Inclusion of Nature in Self scales to measure connection with nature, the New Environmental Paradigm to measure ecological worldviews, and Environmental Motives Scale to assess people’s environmental concern. We further explore the predictive power of connectedness to nature, ecological worldview, and environmental concern for explaining the diverse behavioral domains. Connectedness to nature and ecological worldview were more predictive of civic actions, recycling, household behaviors, and consumerism than were environmental concerns. In the case of policy support and transportation choices, environmental concerns explained more variance than the other constructs.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Environmental behavior; connectedness to nature; ecological worldview; environmental concern.
• Subjects: A - General Economics and Teaching > A1 - General Economics > A14 - Sociology of Economics; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C38 - Classification Methods ; Cluster Analysis ; Principal Components ; Factor Models; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q0 - General > Q00 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q51 - Valuation of Environmental Effects; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q59 - Other

References

Alisat, S., & Riemer, M. (2015). The environmental action scale: Development and psychometric evaluation. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 13–23.

Bamberg, S., & Möser, G. (2007). Twenty years after Hines, Hungerford, and Tomera: A new meta-analysis of psycho-social determinants of pro-environmental behaviour. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 27(1), 14–25.

Barbaro, N., & Pickett, S. M. (2016). Mindfully green: Examining the effect of connectedness to nature on the relationship between mindfulness and engagement in pro-environmental behavior. Personality and Individual Differences, 93, 142-147.

Brown, T.A (2015). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research (2nd ed.). Methodology in the Social Sciences series. New York: The Guilford Press.

Brügger, A., Kaiser, F. G., & Roczen, N. (2011). One for all? Connectedness to nature, inclusion of nature, environmental identity, and implicit association with nature. European Psychologist, 16(4), 324–333.

Davis, J. L., Le, B., & Coy, A. E. (2011). Building a model of commitment to the natural environment to predict ecological behavior and willingness to sacrifice. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 31(3), 257–265.

Dono, J., Webb, J., & Richardson, B. (2010). The relationship between environmental activism, pro-environmental behaviour and social identity. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(2), 178–186.

Dunlap, R. E., Liere, K. D. Van, Mertig, A. G., & Jones, R. E. (2000). Measuring Endorsement of the New Ecological Paradigm: A Revised NEP Scale. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 425–442.

Dunlap, R. E., & Michelson, W. (Ed.). (2002). Handbook of environmental sociology. Westport, CT, USA: Greenwood.

Gatersleben, B. (2013). Measuring environmental behavior. In Steg, L., Van den Berg, A.E., & de Groot, J.I.M. (Ed.), Environmental Psychology: An Introduction (pp.132-140). U.K: British Psychological Society, BPS Blackwell by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Gifford, R. (2008). Psychology's essential role in alleviating the impacts of climate change. Canadian Psychology, 49(4), 273-280.

Gifford, R., & Nilsson, A. (2014). Personal and social factors that influence pro-environmental concern and behaviour: A review. International Journal of Psychology, 49(3), 141–57.

Halkos G.E. (2006), Econometrics: Theory and practice. Giourdas Publications.

Halkos G. (2007). Econometrics: Theory and Practice: Instructions in using Eviews, Minitab, SPSS and Excel. Gutenberg: Athens.

Halkos, G. (2011). Nonparametric Modelling of Biodiversity: Determinants of Threatened Species. Journal of Policy Modelling, 33(4), 618 – 635,

Halkos GE (2015). Climate change actions for sustainable development. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 9, 118–136,

Halkos, G. and Jones, N. (2012). Modeling the effect of social factors on improving biodiversity protection. Ecological Economics, 78, 90-99.

Halkos, G. and Matsiori, S. (2012a). Assessing the Economic Value of Protecting Artificial Lakes. MRPA Munich Personal RePEc Archive 59211.

Halkos, G. and Matsiori, S. (2012b). Determinants of willingness to pay for coastal zone quality improvement. The Journal of SocioEconomics 41, 391-399.

Halkos, G. and Matsiori, S. (2013) The Relationship between People’s attitude and Willingness to Pay for River Conservation. MPRA - Munich Personal RePEc Archive 50560.

Halkos, G. and Matsiori, S. (2014). Exploring social attitude and willingness to pay for water resources conservation. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 49, 54-62.

Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36(7), 1531–1544.

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the Gap: Why Do People Behave Environmentally and What are the Barriers to Pro-Environmental Behaviour. Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.

Larson, L. R., Stedman, R. C., Cooper, C. B., & Decker, D. J. (2015). Understanding the multi-dimensional structure of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 43, 112–124.

Lindenberg, S., & Steg, L. (2007). Normative, gain and hedonic goal frames guiding environmental behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 117–137.

Lokhorst, A. M., Hoon, C., le Rutte, R., & de Snoo, G. (2014). There is an I in nature: The crucial role of the self in nature conservation. Land Use Policy, 39, 121–126.

Mayer, F. S., & Frantz, C. M. (2004). The connectedness to nature scale: A measure of individuals’ feeling in community with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24(4), 503–515.

Perkins, H. E. (2010). Measuring love and care for nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 455–463.

Poortinga, W., Steg, L., Vlek, C., & Poortinga, N. (2004). Values, environmental concern, and environmental behavior - A study into household energy use. Environment and Behavior, 36(1), 70–93.

Schultz, W. P. (2001). the Structure of Environmental Concern: Concern for Self, Other People, and the Biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339.

Schultz, W. P. (2002). Inclusion with Nature: The Psychology of Human-Nature Relations. In Schmuck, P., & Schultz, W.P. (Ed.), Psychology of Sustainable Development (pp.61–78). New York: Kluwer Academic Publishers, Springer Science & Business Media.

Schultz, P. W.,Shriver, C., Tabanico, J.J., & Khazian, A.M (2004). Implicit Connections with Nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, 31–42.

Schultz, P.W., & Kaiser, F. G. (2012). Promoting Pro-Environmental Behavior. In Clayton, S. (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Environmental and Conservation Psychology (pp.661-691). New York: Oxford University Press.

Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29(3), 309–317.

Steg, L., & De Groot, J. I. M. (2012). Environmental values. In Clayton, S. (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 81-92). New York: Oxford University Press.

Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J. W., Keizer, K., & Perlaviciute, G. (2014). An Integrated Framework for Encouraging Pro-environmental Behaviour: The role of values, situational factors and goals. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 38, 104-115.

Stern, P. C. (2000). Toward a Coherent Theory of Environmentally Significant Behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 407–424.

Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2013). Using Multivariate Statistics (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson Education.

Thøgersen, J., & Olander, F. (2006). The dynamic interaction of personal norms and environment-friendly buying behavior: A panel study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 36 (7), 1758-1780.