Gender differences in altruism on mechanical turk: Expectations and actual behaviour

Brañas-Garza, Pablo and Capraro, Valerio and Rascon-Ramirez, Ericka (2018): Gender differences in altruism on mechanical turk: Expectations and actual behaviour.

Abstract

Whether or not there are gender differences in altruistic behaviour in Dictator Game experiments has attracted considerable attention in recent years. Earlier studies found women to be more altruistic than men. However, this conclusion has been challenged by more recent accounts, which have argued that gender differences in altruistic behaviour may be a peculiarity of student samples and may not extend to random samples. Here we study gender differences in altruistic behaviour and, additionally, in expectations of altruistic behaviour, in a sample of Amazon Mechanical Turk crowdworkers living in the US. In Study 1, we report a mega-analysis of more than 3,500 observations and we show that women are significantly more altruistic than men. In Study 2, we show that both women and men expect women to be more altruistic than men.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: dictator game, gender differences, altruism, expectations.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C93 - Field Experiments; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C99 - Other; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J7 - Labor Discrimination > J71 - Discrimination

References

Aguiar, F., Brañas-Garza, P., Cobo-Reyes, R., Jimenez, N., and Miller, L. M. (2009). Are women expected to be more generous? Experimental Economics, 12(1):93–98.

Amir, O., Rand, D. G., and Gal, Y. K. (2012). Economic games on the internet: The effect of $1 stakes. PLoS ONE, 7(2):e31461.

Andreoni, J. and Vesterlund, L. (2001). Which is the fair sex? Gender differences in altruism. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116:293–312.

Arechar, A. A., Gächter, S., and Molleman, L. (2018). Conducting interactive experiments online. Experimental Economics, 21:99–131.

Babcock, L., Recalde, M. P., Vesterlund, L., and Weingart, L. (2017). Gender differences in accepting and receiving requests for tasks with low promotability. American Economic Review, 107(3):714–47.

Berinsky, A. J., Huber, G. A., and Lenz, G. S. (2012). Evaluating online labor markets for experimental research: Amazon.com’s mechanical turk. Political Analysis, 20(3):351– 368.

Biziou-van Pol, L., Haenen, J., Novaro, A., Liberman, A. O., and Capraro, V. (2015). Does telling white lies signal pro-social preferences? Judgment and Decision Making, 10:538– 548.

Bolton, G. E. and Katok, E. (1995). An experimental test for gender differences in beneficent behavior. Economics Letters, 48(3):287–292.

Boschini, A., Dreber, A., von Essen, E., Muren, A., Ranehill, E., et al. (2014). Gender and economic preferences in a large random sample. Technical report, Stockholm University.

Brañas-Garza, P. (2006). Poverty in dictator games: Awakening solidarity. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 60(3):306–320.

Brañas-Garza, P. (2007). Promoting helping behavior with framing in dictator games. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28(4):477–486.

Brañas-Garza, P., Rodriguez-Lara, I., and Sanchez, A. (2017). Humans expect generosity. Scientific Reports, 7:42446.

Breeze, B. and Thornton, A. (2006). Raising a giving nation: A report on 3 years of research and activity with young people and schools by the giving nation programme.

Cappelen, A. W., Nygaard, K., Sørensen, E. Ø., and Tungodden, B. (2015). Social preferences in the lab: A comparison of students and a representative population. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 117(4):1306–1326.

Capraro, V. (2015). The emergence of hyper-altruistic behaviour in conflictual situations. Sci- entific Reports, 4:9916.

Capraro, V., Jordan, J. J., and Rand, D. G. (2014). Heuristics guide the implementation of social preferences in one-shot Prisoner’s Dilemma experiments. Scientific reports, 4:6790.

Capraro, V. and Kuilder, J. (2016). To know or not to know? Looking at payoffs signals selfish behavior, but it does not actually mean so. Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 65:79–84.

Capraro, V. and Marcelletti, A. (2014). Do good actions inspire good actions in others? Scien- tific Reports, 4:7470.

Capraro, V. and Sippel, J. (2017). Gender differences in moral judgment and the evaluation of gender-specified moral agents. Cognitive Processing, 18(4):399–405.

Carpenter, J., Connolly, C., and Myers, C. K. (2008). Altruistic behavior in a representative dictator experiment. Experimental Economics, 11(3):282–298.

Charness, G. and Gneezy, U. (2008). What’s in a name? Anonymity and social distance in dictator and ultimatum games. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 68(1):29– 35.

d’Adda, G., Capraro, V., and Tavoni, M. (2017). Push, don’t nudge: Behavioral spillovers and policy instruments. Economics Letters, 154:92–95.

Delavande, A. and Zafar, B. (2015). Stereotypes and madrassas: Experimental evidence from Pakistan. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 118:247–267.

Dickinson, D. L. and Tiefenthaler, J. (2002). What is fair? experimental evidence. Southern Economic Journal, pages 414–428.

Dreber, A., Ellingsen, T., Johannesson, M., and Rand, D. G. (2013). Do people care about social context? framing effects in dictator games. Experimental Economics, 16(3):349– 371.

Dreber, A., von Essen, E., and Ranehill, E. (2014). Gender and competition in adolescence: task matters. Experimental Economics, 17(1):154–172.

Dufwenberg, M. and Gneezy, U. (2000). Measuring beliefs in an experimental lost wallet game. Games and Economic Behavior, 30(2):163–182.

Dufwenberg, M. and Muren, A. (2006). Gender composition in teams. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 61(1):50–54.

Eagly, A. H. (1987). Sex differences in social behavior: A social-role interpretation. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

Eagly, A. H. (2009). The his and hers of prosocial behavior: An examination of the social psychology of gender. American Psychologist, 64(8):644.

Eckel, C. C. and Grossman, P. J. (1998). Are women less selfish than men?: Evidence from dictator experiments. The Economic Journal, 108(448):726–735.

Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental Economics, 14(4):583–610. Franzen, A. and Pointner, S. (2013). The external validity of giving in the dictator game. Experimental Economics, 16(2):155–169.

Heilman, M. E. and Chen, J. J. (2005). Same behavior, different consequences: Reactions to men’s and women’s altruisitc citizenship behavior. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90:431–434.

Heilman, M. E. and Okimoto, T. G. (2007). Why are women penalized for success at male tasks?: The implied communality deficit. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92:81–92.

Horton, J. J., Rand, D. G., and Zeckhauser, R. J. (2011). The online laboratory: Conducting experiments in a real labor market. Experimental Economics, 14(3):399–425.

Houser, D. and Schunk, D. (2009). Fairness, competition and gender: Evidence from German schoolchildren. Journal of Economic Psychology, 30:634–641.

Kettner, S. E. and Ceccato, S. (2014). Framing matters in gender-paired dictator games. Tech- nical report, Discussion paper, University of Heidelberg.

Mason, W. and Suri, S. (2012). Conducting behavioral research on Amazon’s Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 44(1):1–23.

Mesch, D. J., Brown, M. S., Moore, Z. I., and Hayat, A. D. (2011). Gender differences in charitable giving. International Journal of Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Marketing, 16(4):342–355.

Mixer, J. R. (1993). Principles of professional fundraising: Useful foundations for successful practice. Jossey-Bass Inc Pub.

Paolacci, G. and Chandler, J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 23(3):184–188.

Paolacci, G., Chandler, J., and Ipeirotis, P. G. (2010). Running experiments on Amazon Me- chanical Turk. Judgment and Decision Making, 5:411–419.

Peysakhovich, A., Nowak, M. A., and Rand, D. G. (2014). Humans display a ‘cooperative phe- notype’ that is domain general and temporally stable. Nature Communications, 5:4939.

Piliavin, J. A. and Charng, H.-W. (1990). Altruism: A review of recent theory and research. Annual Review of Sociology, 16(1):27–65.

Piper, G. and Schnepf, S. V. (2008). Gender differences in charitable giving in great britain. Voluntas: International Journal of Voluntary and Nonprofit Organizations, 19(2):103– 124.

Rand, D. G., Brescoll, V., Everett, J. A., Capraro, V., and Barcelo, H. (2016). Social heuris- tics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145:389–396.

Shapiro, D. N., Chandler, J., and Mueller, P. A. (2013). Using Mechanical Turk to study clinical populations. Clinical Psychological Science, 1(2):213–220.

Williams, J. E. and Best, D. L. (1990). Measuring sex stereotypes: A multination study, Rev. Sage Publications, Inc.