Schmitz, Patrick W. (2017): Incomplete Contracts, Shared Ownership, and Investment Incentives. Published in: Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , Vol. 144, (2017): pp. 153-165.
PDF
MPRA_paper_90801.pdf Download (532kB) |
Abstract
Consider a partnership consisting of two symmetrically informed parties who may each own a share of an asset. It is ex post efficient that tomorrow the party with the larger valuation gets the asset. Yet, today the parties can make investments to enhance the asset's productivity. Contracts are incomplete, so today only the ownership structure can be specified, which may be renegotiated tomorrow. It turns out that shared ownership is often optimal. If the investments are embodied in the physical asset, it may be optimal that party B has a larger ownership share even when party A has a larger valuation and a better investment technology. When shared ownership is taken into account, joint ownership in the sense of bilateral veto power cannot be optimal, regardless of whether the investments are in human capital or in physical capital.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Incomplete Contracts, Shared Ownership, and Investment Incentives |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | property rights, incomplete contracts, investment incentives, partnership dissolution, shared ownership |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C78 - Bargaining Theory ; Matching Theory D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D23 - Organizational Behavior ; Transaction Costs ; Property Rights D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L24 - Contracting Out ; Joint Ventures ; Technology Licensing O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D |
Item ID: | 90801 |
Depositing User: | Patrick W. Schmitz |
Date Deposited: | 28 Dec 2018 02:38 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 08:00 |
References: | Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Legros, P., Zingales, L., 2016. The Impact of Incomplete Contracts on Economics. Oxford University Press. Aghion, P., Tirole, J., 1994. The management of innovation. Quarterly Journal of Economics 109, 1185--1209. Akintoye, A., 2009. PPPs for physical infrastructure in developing countries. In: Akintoye, A., Beck, M. (eds), Policy, Finance and Management for Public-Private Partnerships, Blackwell Publishing, 123--144. Besley, T., Ghatak, M., 2001. Government versus private ownership of public goods. Quarterly Journal of Economics 116, 1343--1372. Bhattacharyya, S., Lafontaine, F., 1995. Double-sided moral hazard and the nature of share contracts. Rand Journal of Economics 26, 761--781. Bleeke, J., Ernst, D., 1995. Is your strategic alliance really a sale? Harvard Business Review 73, 97--105. Bunting, W.C., 2016. Resolving conflicts over scarce resources: Private versus shared ownership. Marquette Law Review 99, 893--929. Buso, M., Marty, F., Tran, P.T., 2017. Public-private partnerships from budget constraints: Looking for debt hiding? International Journal of Industrial Organization 51, 56--84. Chan, S.H., Kensinger, J.W., Keown, A.J., Martin, J.D., 1997. Do strategic alliances create value? Journal of Financial Economics 46, 199--221. Cramton, P., Gibbons, R., Klemperer, P., 1987. Dissolving a partnership efficiently. Econometrica 55, 615--632. d'Aspremont, C., Gérard-Varet, L.A., 1979. Incentives and incomplete information. Journal of Public Economics 11, 25--45. Deng, Z., Song, S., Chen, Y., 2016. Private participation in infrastructure project and its impact on the project cost. China Economic Review 39, 63--76. Desai, M.A., Foley, C.F., Hines, J.R., 2004. The costs of shared ownership: evidence from international joint ventures. Journal of Financial Economics 73, 323--374. Desrieux, C., 2009. Owner or holder? A critical study of property rights in public services. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 165, 230--249. Erlei, M., Siemer, J.P., 2014. Endogenous property rights in a hold-up experiment. Metroeconomica 65, 237--270. Figueroa, N., Skreta, V., 2011. What to put on the table. Working Paper. Fosfuri, A., Helmers, C., Roux, C., 2017. Shared ownership of intangible property rights: The case of patent co-assignments. Working Paper. Gattai, V., Natale, P., 2016. Investment spillovers and the allocation of property rights. Economics Letters 145, 109--113. Gattai, V., Natale, P., 2017. A new Cinderella story: Joint ventures and the property rights theory of the firm. Journal of Economic Surveys 31, 281--302. Goldlücke, S., Schmitz, P.W., 2014. Investments as signals of outside options. Journal of Economic Theory 150, 683--708. Goltsman, M., 2011. Optimal information transmission in a holdup problem. Rand Journal of Economics 42, 495--526. Greco, L., 2015. Imperfect bundling in public-private partnerships. Journal of Public Economic Theory 17, 136--146. Grossman, S.J., Hart, O.D., 1986. The costs and benefits of ownership: A theory of vertical and lateral integration. Journal of Political Economy 94, 691--719. Hart, O.D., 1995. Firms, Contracts and Financial Structure. Oxford University Press. Hart, O.D., Moore, J., 1990. Property rights and the nature of the firm. Journal of Political Economy 98, 1119--1158. Hart, O., Moore, J., 2008. Contracts as reference points. Quarterly Journal of Economics 123, 1--48. Hart, O., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R.W., 1997. The proper scope of government: theory and application to prisons. Quarterly Journal of Economics 112, 1127--1161. Holmström, B., 1999. The firm as a subeconomy. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 15, 74--102. Holmström, B., Milgrom, P., 1994. The firm as an incentive system. American Economic Review 84, 972--991. Hoppe, E.I., Schmitz, P.W., 2013. Public-private partnerships versus traditional procurement: Innovation incentives and information gathering. RAND Journal of Economics 44, 56--74. Huberman, G., Kahn, C., 1988. Limited contract enforcement and strategic renegotiation. American Economic Review 78, 471--484. Kusterer, D.J., Schmitz, P.W., 2017. The management of innovation: experimental evidence. Games and Economic Behavior 104, 706--725. Laffont, J.-J., Martimort, D., 2002. The Theory of Incentives: The Principal-Agent Model. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press. Lau, S., 2008. Information and bargaining in the hold-up problem. Rand Journal of Economics 39, 266--282. Li, S., Sun, H., Yan, J., Yu, J., 2015. Bundling decisions in procurement auctions with sequential tasks. Journal of Public Economics 128, 96--106. Maskin, E., Moore, J., 1999. Implementation and renegotiation. Review of Economic Studies 66, 39--56. Mori, Y., 2017. A formal model of firm boundaries and haggling. Economics Letters 156, 15--17. Muthoo, A., 1999. Bargaining Theory With Applications. Cambridge University Press. Myerson, R.B., Satterthwaite, M.A., 1983. Efficient mechanisms for bilateral trading. Journal of Economic Theory 29, 265--281. Oxley, J.E., Sampson, R.C., 2004. The scope and governance of international R&D alliances. Strategic Management Journal 25, 723--749. Pisano, G.P., 1989. Using equity participation to support exchange: Evidence from the biotechnology industry. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 5, 109--126. Rogerson, W.P., 1992. Contractual solutions to the hold-up problem. Review of Economic Studies 59, 777--793. Rosenkranz, S., Schmitz, P.W., 2003. Optimal allocation of ownership rights in dynamic R&D alliances. Games and Economic Behavior 43, 153--173. Santamaría, L., Nieto, M.J., Barge-Gil, A., 2009. Beyond formal R&D: taking advantage of other sources of innovation in low- and medium-technology industries. Research Policy 38, 507--517. Sarmento, J.M., Renneboog, L., 2016. Anatomy of public-private partnerships: their creation, financing and renegotiations. International Journal of Managing Projects in Business 9, 94-122. Saussier, S., Staropoli, C., Yvrande-Billon, A., 2009. Public-private agreements, institutions, and competition: When economic theory meets facts. Review of Industrial Organization 35, 1--18. Schmitz, P.W., 2002. Simple contracts, renegotiation under asymmetric information, and the hold-up problem. European Economic Review 46, 169--188. Schmitz, P.W., 2006. Information gathering, transaction costs, and the property rights approach. American Economic Review 96, 422--434. Schmitz, P.W., 2015. Government versus private ownership of public goods: The role of bargaining frictions. Journal of Public Economics 132, 23--31. Segal, I., Whinston, M.D., 2013. Property rights. Handbook of Organizational Economics, 100--158. Sonnemans, J., Oosterbeek, H., Sloof, R., 2001. On the relation between asset ownership and specific investments. Economic Journal 111, 791--820. Stein, J.C., 1997. Internal capital markets and the competition for corporate resources. Journal of Finance 52, 111--133. Su, A. P.-J., 2017. Information revelation in the property right theory of the firms. International Journal of Industrial Organization 52, 133--164. Tamada, Y., Tsai, T.-S., 2007. Optimal organization in a sequential investment problem with the principal's cancellation option. International Journal of Industrial Organization 25, 631--641. Tamada, Y., Tsai, T.-S., 2014. Delegating the decision-making authority to terminate a sequential project. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 99, 178--194. Tirole, J., 1999. Incomplete contracts: Where do we stand? Econometrica 67, 741--781. Tirole, J., 2015. Cognition-intensive contracting. Discussion Paper, Toulouse School of Economics. Tsai, T.-S., Kung, S.-C., 2011. Sequential investments, know-how transmission, and optimal organization. BE Journal of Theoretical Economics 11, 1--24. Walker, P., 2013. The `reference point' approach to the theory of the firm: An introduction. Journal of Economic Surveys 27, 670--695. Zhao, H., Zhu, G., 1998. Determinants of ownership preference of international joint ventures: new evidence from Chinese manufacturing industries. International Business Review 7, 569--589. Zingales, L. 2016. Why the incomplete contract approach is important for finance. In: Aghion, P., Dewatripont, M., Legros, P., Zingales, L. (eds.), The Impact of Incomplete Contracts on Economics. Oxford University Press. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/90801 |