Kang, Kee-Youn (2019): Cryptocurrency, Delivery Lag, and Double Spending History.
PDF
MPRA_paper_93598.pdf Download (1MB) |
Abstract
We develop a general equilibrium model of cryptocurrency to study the optimal design of a cryptocurrency system. Agents trade cryptocurrency using digital wallets, and the cryptocurrency system provides verification of a digital wallet’s history of double spending attempts. Delaying the delivery of goods until payment information is confirmed in the blockchain prevents double spending. However, double spending can be prevented without a delivery lag under some conditions if a wallet has a good reputation in terms of its history of double spending attempts. In particular, as the difficulty of mining work rises, the incentive to engage in double spending with a good wallet decreases. We study the optimal design of the cryptocurrency system in terms of the difficulty of mining work and the supply of cryptocurrency and evaluate the welfare gain that would be captured if the current Bitcoin system adopted the optimal cryptocurrency system.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Cryptocurrency, Delivery Lag, and Double Spending History |
English Title: | Cryptocurrency, Delivery Lag, and Double Spending History |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Blockchain, Cryptocurrency, Delivery lag, Double spending, Trade history |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D86 - Economics of Contract: Theory E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E40 - General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E50 - General G - Financial Economics > G1 - General Financial Markets > G10 - General |
Item ID: | 93598 |
Depositing User: | Dr Kee-Youn Kang |
Date Deposited: | 04 Jul 2019 06:22 |
Last Modified: | 27 Sep 2019 03:20 |
References: | - AZARIADIS, C. (2014): “Credit Policy in times of Financial Distress,” Journal of Macroeconomics, 39, 337–345. - AZARIADIS, C. AND L. KASS (2007): “Asset price fluctuations without aggregate shocks,” Journal of Economic Theory, 136, 126–143. - ——— (2013): “Endogenous credit limits with small default costs,” Journal of Economic Theory, 148, 806–824. - BAKLANOVA, V., C. CAGLIO, M. CIPRIANI, AND A. COPELAND (2017): “Beyond the doomsday economics of ”proof-of-work” in cryptocurrencies,” Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports 758. - BERENTSEN, A. AND F. SCHAR (2018): “A Short Introduction to the World of Cryptocurrencies,” Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis Review, 100, 1–16. - BIAIS, B., C. BISIERE, M. BOUVARD, AND C. CASAMATTA (2018): “The blockchain folk theorem,” Working paper. - BÖHME, R., N. CHRISTIN, B. EDELMAN, AND T. MOORE (2015): “Bitcoin: Economics, Technology, and Governance,” Journal of Economic Perspectives, 29, 213–238. - CARAPELLA, F. AND S. WILLIAMSON (2015): “Credit Markets, Limited Commitment, and Government Debt,” Review of Economic Studies, 82, 963–990. - CHIU, J. AND T. KOEPPL (2017): “The Economics of Cryptocurrencies - Bitcoin and Beyond,” Working Papers 1389, Queen’s University, Department of Economics. - CONG, L. W., Y. LI, AND N. WANG (2018): “Tokenomics: Dynamic Adoption and Valuation,” Working paper, Ohio State University, Charles A. Dice Center for Research in Financial Economics. - EASLEY, D., M. O’HARA, AND S. BASU (Forthcoming): “From Mining to Markets: The Evolution of Bitcoin Transaction Fees,” Journal of Financial Economics. - GANDAL, N. AND H. HALABURDA (2014): “Competition in the Cryptocurrency Market,” Working Papers 14-17, NET Institute. - GANDAL, N., J. HAMRICK, T. MOORE, AND T. OBERMAN (2018): “Price manipulation in the Bitcoin ecosystem,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 95, 86–96. - GLASER, F., M. HAFERKORN, M. WEBER, AND K. ZIMMERMANN (2014): “How to price a Digital Currency? Empirical Insights on the Influence of Media Coverage on the Bitcoin Bubble,” Banking and information technology, 15, 1404–1416. - GU, C., F. MATTESINI, C. MONNET, AND R. WRIGHT (2013): “Endogenous Credit Cycles,” Journal of Political Economy, 121, 940–965. - HELLWIG, C. AND G. LORENZONI (2009): “Bubbles and Self-Enforcing Debt,” Econometrica, 77, 1137–1164. - KANG, K.-Y. AND S. LEE (2019): “Money, Cryptocurrency, and Monetary Policy,” Working paper. - KEHOE, T. J. AND D. K. LEVINE (1993): “Debt-Constrained Asset Markets,” Review of Economic Studies, 60, 856–888. - LAGOS, R. AND G. ROCHETEAU (2005): “Inflation, output, and welfare,” International Economic Review, 46, 495–522. - LAGOS, R., G. ROCHETEAU, AND R. WRIGHT (2017): “Liquidity: A new monetarist perspective,” Journal of Economic Literature, 55, 371–440. - LAGOS, R. AND R. WRIGHT (2005): “A unified framework for monetary theory and policy analysis,” Journal of Political Economy, 113, 463–484. - LO, S. AND J. C. WANG (2014): “Bitcoin as Money?” Federal Reserve Bank of Boston Current Policy Perspectives 14-4. - NAKAMOTO, S. (2008): “Bitcoin: A peer-to-peer electronic cash system,” . - NOSAL, E. AND G. ROCHETEAU (2011): Money, payments, and liquidity, MIT press, Cambridge. - ROCHETEAU, G. AND R. WRIGHT (2005): “Money in search equilibrium, in competitive equilibrium, and in competitive search equilibrium,” Econometrica, 73, 175–202. - SANCHES, D. AND S. WILLIAMSON (2010): “Money and credit with limited commitment and theft,” Journal of Economic Theory, 145, 1525–1549. - SANCHES, D. R. (2018): “Bitcoin vs. the Buck: Is Currency Competition a Good Thing?” Federal reserve bank of philadelphia economic insights articles, Federal Reserve Bank of Philadelphia. - SCHILLING, L. AND H. UHLIG (2018): “Some simple Bitcoin Economics,” NBER Working Papers 24483, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc. - VELDE, F. R. (2013): “Bitcoin: A primer,” Chicago Fed Letter 317. - WEBER, B. (2016): “Bitcoin and the legitimacy crisis of money,” Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40, 17–41. - WILLIAMSON, S. AND R. WRIGHT (2010): “New monetarist economics: Models,” in Handbook of Monetary Economics, Elsevier, vol. 3, 25–96. - YERMACK, D. (2015): “Is Bitcoin a Real Currency? An economic appraisal,” The Handbook of Digital Currency, 31–43. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/93598 |
Available Versions of this Item
- Cryptocurrency, Delivery Lag, and Double Spending History. (deposited 04 Jul 2019 06:22) [Currently Displayed]