Korpela, Ville and Lombardi, Michele (2019): Mechanism design with farsighted agents.
PDF
MPRA_paper_94436.pdf Download (363kB) |
Abstract
Agents are farsighted when they consider the ultimate results to which their own actions may lead to. We re-examine the classical questions of implementation theory under complete information in a setting with transfers where farsighted coalitions are regarded as fundamental behavioral units and the equilibrium outcomes of their interactions are predicted via the stability notion of the largest consistent set. The designer's exercise consists of designing a rights structure, which formalizes the idea of power distribution in society. His or her challenge lies in designing a rights structure in which the equilibrium behavior of agents always coincides with the recommendation given by a social choice function. We show that (Maskin) monotonicity fully identifies the class of social choice functions that are implementable by a rights structure. We also discuss how this result changes when social choice correspondences are considered.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Mechanism design with farsighted agents |
English Title: | Mechanism design with farsighted agents |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Farsightedness; implementation; transfers; rights structures; coaltions; largest consistent set; monotonicity |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C71 - Cooperative Games D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D71 - Social Choice ; Clubs ; Committees ; Associations D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design |
Item ID: | 94436 |
Depositing User: | prof. Ville Korpela |
Date Deposited: | 12 Jun 2019 11:34 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 12:19 |
References: | Aumann R, Myerson R. Endogenous Formation of Links Between Players and of Coalitions, An Application of the Shapley Value, in The Shapley Value: Essays in Honor of Lloyd Shapley, Alvin Roth, ed., 175-191. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Bloch F, van den Nouweland A. Farsighted stability with heterogeneous expectations. Mimeo, (2017). Chwe M S-Y. Farsighted coalitional stability. J Econ Theory 63 (1994) 299-325. Cabrales A, Serrano R. Implementation in adaptive better-response dynamics: Towards a general theory of bounded rationality in mechanisms. Game Econ Behav 73 (2011) 360-374. Diamantoudi E, Xue L. Farsighted Stability in Hedonic Games. Soc Choice Welf 21 (2003) 39-61. Dutta B, Vohra R. Rational Expectations and Farsighted Stability. Theoretical Econ 12 (2017) 1191-1227. Dutta B, Vartiainen H. Coalition Formation and History Dependence. Mimeo, (2018). Gaudet G, Salant SW. Uniqueness of Cournot Equilibrium: New results from old methods. Rev Econ Stud 58 (1991) 399-404. Harsanyi, J. An equilibrium-point interpretation of stable sets and a proposed alternative definition. Manag Sci 20 (1974) 1472-1495. Herings P J-J, Mauleon A, Vannetelbosch V. Rationalizability for social environments. Game Econ Behav 49 (2004) 135-156. Jordan J. Pillage and Property. J Econ Theory 131 (2006) 26-44. Kimya M. Equilibrium Coalitional Behavior. Mimeo, Brown University (2015). Koray S, Yildiz K. Implementation via rights structures. J Econ Theory 176 (2018) 479-502. Korpela V, Lombardi M, Vartiainen H. Do Coalitions Matter in Designing Institutions? (December, 2018) Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3305209 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3305209 Mauleon A, Vannetelbosch V, Vergote W. von Neumann Morgenstern farsighted stable sets in two-sided matching. Theoretical Econ 6 (2011) 499-521. Maskin E. Nash equilibrium and welfare optimality. Rev Econ Studies 66 (1999) 23-38. Maskin E, Sjöström T. Implementation theory. In: K. Arrow, A.K. Sen, K. Suzumura (Eds), Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 2002, pp. 237-288. Mcquillin B, Sugden R. The representation of alienable and inalienable rights: games in transition function form. Soc Choice Welf 37(2011) 683-706. Morimoto S, Serizawa S. Strategy-proofness and efficiency with non-quasi-linear preferences: A characterization of minimum price Walrasian rule. Theoretical Econ 10 (2015) 445-487. von Neumann J, Morgenstern O. Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ, 1947. Ray D. A Game-Theoretic Perspective on Coalition Formation. Oxford University Press, 2007. Ray D, Vohra R. The Farsighted Stable Set. Econometrica 83 (2015) 977-1011. Sertel MR. Designing rights: Invisible hand theorems, covering and membership, mimeo, 2001, Bogazici University. Vartiainen H. Dynamic coalitional equilibrium. J Econ Theory 146 (2011) 672-698. Vohra R, Ray D. Maximality in the Farsighted Stable Set. Econometrica (2019), forthcoming. Xue L. Nonemptiness of the Largest Consistent Set. J Econ Theory 73 (1997) 453-459. Xue L. Coalitional Stability under Perfect Foresight. Econ Theory 11 (1998) 603-627. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/94436 |