Microeconometric Dynamic Panel Data Methods: Model Specification and Selection Issues

Kiviet, Jan (2019): Microeconometric Dynamic Panel Data Methods: Model Specification and Selection Issues.

Abstract

A motivated strategy is presented to find step by step an adequate model specification and a matching set of instrumental variables by applying the programming tools provided by the Stata package Xtabond2. The aim is to implement generalized method of moment techniques such that useful and reasonably accurate inferences are extracted from an observational panel data set on a single microeconometric structural presumably dynamic behavioral relationship. In the suggested specification search three comprehensive heavily interconnected goals are pursued, namely: (i) to include all the relevant appropriately transformed possibly lagged regressors, as well as any interactions between these if it is required to relax the otherwise very strict homogeneity restrictions on the dynamic impacts of the explanatories in standard linear panel data models; (ii) to correctly classify all regressors as either endogenous, predetermined or exogenous, as well as being either effect-stationary or effect-nonstationary, implying which internal variables could represent valid and relatively strong instruments; (iii) to enhance the accuracy of inference in finite samples by omitting irrelevant regressors and by profitably reducing the space spanned by the full set of available internal instruments. For the various tests which trigger the decisions to be made in the sequential selection process the relevant considerations are spelled out to interpret the magnitude of p-values. Also the complexities to establish and interpret the ultimately established dynamic impacts are explained. Finally the developed strategy is applied to a classic data set and is shown to yield new insights.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: classification of explanatories; dynamic impacts; interactions; feedback mechanisms; generalized method of moments; labor demand; model building strategy; short panels.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C18 - Methodological Issues: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C26 - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C52 - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C81 - Methodology for Collecting, Estimating, and Organizing Microeconomic Data ; Data Access; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs > C87 - Econometric Software; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J2 - Demand and Supply of Labor > J23 - Labor Demand

References

Arellano, M., Bond, S.R., 1991. Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies 58, 277-297.

Blundell, R., Bond, S., 1998. Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 87, 115-143.

Bond, S.R., 2002. Dynamic panel data models: A guide to micro data methods and practice. Portuguese Economic Journal 1, 141-162.

Bun, M.J.G, Kiviet, J.F., 2006. The effects of dynamic feedbacks on LS and MM estimator accuracy in panel data models. Journal of Econometrics 132, 409-444.

Greenland, S., Senn, S.J., Rothman, K.J., Carlin, J.B., Poole, C., Goodman, S.N., Altman, D.G., 2016. Statistical tests, P values, confidence intervals, and power: a guide to misinterpretations. European Journal of Epidemiology 31, 337-350.

Harvey, A.C., 1990. The Econometric Analysis of Time Series, second edition. Philip Allan, New York.

Hayashi, Fumio, 2000. Econometrics. Princeton, Princeton University Press.

Hendry, D.F., 1995. Dynamic Econometrics. Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.

Kiviet, J.F., 2017. Discriminating between (in)valid external instruments and (in)valid exclusion restrictions. Journal of Econometric Methods 6(1), 1-9.

Kiviet, J.F., 2019. Testing the impossible: identifying exclusion restrictions. Forthcoming in The Journal of Econometrics.

Kiviet, J.F., Phillips, G.D.A., 1986. Testing strategies for model specification. Applied Mathematics and Computation 20, 237-269.

Kiviet, J.F., Pindado, J., Requejo, I., 2019. Specification of dynamic panel data models: An empirical application to corporate finance. Draft mimeo.

Kiviet, J.F., Pleus, M., Poldermans, R.W., 2017. Accuracy and efficiency of various GMM inference techniques in dynamic micro panel data models. Econometrics 5(1), 14.

Roodman, D., 2009a. How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system GMM in Stata. The Stata Journal 9, 86-136.

Roodman, D., 2009b. A note on the theme of too many instruments. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 71, 135-158.

Spanos, A., 2018. Mis-specification testing in retrospect. Journal of Economic Surveys 32, 541-577.

Van den Doel, I.T., Kiviet, J.F., 1994. Asymptotic consequences of neglected dynamics in individual effects models. Statistica Neerlandica 48, 71-85.

Wasserstein, R.L., Lazar, N.A., 2016. The ASA's statement on p-values: Context, process, and purpose. The American Statistician 70, 129-133.

Windmeijer, F., 2005. A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of Econometrics 126, 25-51.