Haqiqi, Iman and Mortazavi Kakhaki, Morteza (2012): The Impact of Redistribution of Opportunities on Income Inequality: A CGE Approach. Published in: Journal of Economic Modeling Research , Vol. 2, No. 7 (2012): pp. 51-73.
PDF
MPRA_paper_95819.pdf Download (504kB) |
Abstract
The allocation of opportunities affects income distribution and income inequality. This paper analyzes the economic impacts of the initial allocation of resources and redistribution of opportunities. In this study, we apply a computable general equilibrium (CGE) model focusing on the distribution of opportunities and allocation of available resources. The differences between households' income are caused by differences in labor income (skilled and unskilled) and the household's income from capital stock. The model is calibrated based on the micro consistent matrix (MCM) of the Iranian economy. We found that the redistribution of opportunities and re-allocation of resources can reduce inequality. In other words, improvement inequality of opportunities leads to more equal society. The important finding of the study is that an increase in inequality of opportunity may cause the income gap grows faster. So, big reduction in inequality of income after a small reduction in inequality of opportunities can be witnessed.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The Impact of Redistribution of Opportunities on Income Inequality: A CGE Approach |
English Title: | The Impact of Redistribution of Opportunities on Income Inequality: A CGE Approach |
Language: | Persian |
Keywords: | Justice, equality, general equilibrium, access to public services, equality of endowments, Dworkin |
Subjects: | B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B3 - History of Economic Thought: Individuals > B31 - Individuals C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C68 - Computable General Equilibrium Models D - Microeconomics > D5 - General Equilibrium and Disequilibrium > D58 - Computable and Other Applied General Equilibrium Models D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D63 - Equity, Justice, Inequality, and Other Normative Criteria and Measurement |
Item ID: | 95819 |
Depositing User: | Iman Haqiqi |
Date Deposited: | 02 Sep 2019 05:44 |
Last Modified: | 01 Oct 2019 01:53 |
References: | آهنچيان، محمدرضـا ، 1386، »فرصـت هـاي آموزشـي و نـابرابري منطقـه اي در مـدارس منـاطق مـرزي و غيرمرزي استان خراسان رضوي ،« مجلة علـوم تربيتـي و روانشناسـي دانشـگاه شـهيد چمـران اهـواز ، دورة ،3 س14، ش3، ص 27تا44. سرخ، اسماعيل، 1386، »نابرابري هاي آموزشي و نابرابري فضايي در بعد قـومي و منطقـه اي؛ مطالعـة مـوردي دورة ابتدايي استان آذربايجان غربي در سال تحصيلي 81 -1380«. فصل نامة تعليم وتربيت، س23، ش3. شاهمرادي، اصغر و ايمان حقيقي و راضيه زاهدي، 1389، »طراحي مدل تعادل عمومي محاسبه پذير بـرا ي ايران«، وزارت امور اقتصادي و دارايي، معاونت امور اقتصادي. شاهمرادي، اصغر و ايمان حقيقي و راضيه زاهدي، 1390، »بررسي اثرات افزايش قيمت حامل هاي انرژي و پرداخت يارانة نقدي در ايران؛ رويكرد CGE ،« فصلنامـة پـژوهش هـا و سياسـتهـاي اقتصـادي، س 19، ش57. شاهمرادي، اصغر و ايمان حقيقـي و داود منظـور ، 1389، » بررسـي اثـرات حـذف يارانـة آشـكار و پنهـان انرژي در ايران ؛ مدل سازي تعـادل عمـوم ي محاسـبه پـذير بـر مبنـا ي مـاتريس داده هـاي خـرد تعـد يل شـده ،« فصل نامة مطالعات اقتصاد انرژي، ش26. عبدالهي، حسين، 1374، بررسي و مقايسة دورة آموزش متوسطة نظري در شهرهاي استان آذربايجـان غربـي ، ازنظر بودجهو نيروي انساني و امكانات آموزشي در برنامة اول توسعه (1368تا1372) بـه منظـور توزيـع عادلانـة امكانات بين مناطق، پايان نامة كارشناسي ارشد، دانشكدة علوم تربيتي و روانشناسي دانشگاه تربيت معلم. لشگري، محمد، 1388، توسعة اقتصادي و برنامه ريزي، چ ،1 دانشگاه پيام نور. ك ـارنوي، م ـارتين و هن ـري ل ـوين ، 1367، بـن بسـت هـاي اصـلاحات آموزشـي ، ترجم ـة محمدحس ـين اميرتيموري، تهران: نشر روز. كليدري، محمدحسن، 1374، بررسي ميزان نابرابري فرصتهاي آموزشي در استان خراسـان ، طـي برنامـة اول(1368تا1372)، پايان نامة كارشناسي ارشد، دانشكدة علوم تربيتي و روانشناسي دانشگاه علامه طباطبايي. كميتة برنامه ريزي آموزش متوسطة استان اصفهان، 1368، نابرابري دستيابي بـه فرصـت هـاي آموزشـي در استان اصفهان، معاونت آموزش متوسطة ادارة كل آموزش وپرورش اصفهان. نبي زاده سرابندي، سيما، 1382، رتبه بندي منـاطق و نـواحي آموزشـي اسـتان سيسـتان و بلوچسـتان ازنظـر فرصت هاي آموزشي سال تحصيلي81-80، سازمان آموزش وپرورش استان سيستان و بلوچستان. نوروزي، داريوش و ديگران، 1365، بررسي پايگـاه اجتمـاعي ، اقتصـادي، فرهنگـي دانشـجويان دانشـگاه مازندران، بابلسر: معاونت پژوهشي دانشگاه مازندران. Arlegi R, Nieto J, 1999, “Equality of opportunity: Cardinality-based criteria”, In: de Swart H (ed) Logic, Game Theory and Social Choice, Tilburg University Press, Tilburg, pp. 458–481. Arneson, Richard, 1989, “Equity and Equality of Opportunity for Welfare”, Philosophical Study, 56: pp. 77–93. Bennett, C., Both, C. &Yeadle, S, 2001, Mainstreaming Equality in the Committees of the Scottish parliament, University of strathclyde. Bossert W, Fleurbaey M, Van de gaer D, 1999, “Responsibility, Talent, and Compensation: A Second-Best Analysis”, Review of Economic Design, 4: pp. 35– 55. Cohen, G. A, 1989, “On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice”, Ethics, 99: pp. 906– 944. Dworkin, Ronald, 2000, Sovereign Virtue: the Theory and Practice of Equality, Cambridge, MA: Harvard university press. Dworkin, Ronald, Summer, 1981a, “What is Equality? Part 1: Equality of Welfare”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 185-246. Dworkin, Ronald, Autumn, 1981b, “What is Equality? Part 2: Equality of Resources”, Philosophy and Public Affairs, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 283-345 Kranich L, 1996, “Equitable opportunities: An axiomatic approach”, Journal of Economic Theory, 71: pp. 131–147. Nunez, J, Tartakowsky, A, 2007, “Inequality of Outcomes vs. Inequality of Opportunities in a Developing Country An exploratory analysis for Chile”, Estudios de Economia, Vol. 34, No. 2, pp. 185-202. Ok EA, 1997, “On opportunity inequality measurement”, Journal of Economic Theory, 77: pp. 300–329. Peragine V, 1999, “The distribution and redistribution of opportunity”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 13: pp. 37–70. Roemer, John E, 1996, Theories of Distributive Justice, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Roemer, John E, 1998, Equality of Opportunity, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Roemer, John E, 2000, “Equality of Opportunity”, in Meritocracy and Economic Inequality, Keneth Arrow, Samuel Bowles and Steven Durlauf, editors,Princeton University Press, New Jersey. Roemer, John, Jul., 2001, “Three Egalitarian Views and American Law”, Law and Philosophy, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 433-460 Rutherford, T. F, 1995, “Extensions of GAMS for complementarity problems arising in applied economics”, Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 19(8): pp.1299–1324. Rutherford,T.f, 1994, Applied General Equilibrium Modeling with MPSGE as a GAMS Subsystem, Manuscript, Department of economics, University of Colorado, Boulder. Rutherford, Thomas F. D., Sigrist, 2010, “What if? Policy analysis with calibrated equilibrium models”, CEPE Working paper series, RePEc:cee: wpcepe:10-72. Rutherford, Thomas F. Christoph, Böhringer, 2009, “Integrated assessment of energy policies: Decomposing top-down and bottom-up”. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control. Sen, Amartya K, 1980, “Equality of What?”, In S. McMurrin, ed., Tanner Lectures on Human Values,vol I. Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press. Weymark, JA, 1981, “Generalized Gini inequality indices”, Mathematical Social Sciences, 1: pp. 409–430 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/95819 |