Short Term versus Long Term Effects of the Louisville Enterprise Zone Incentives: A Response to Zhang

Lambert, Thomas (2019): Short Term versus Long Term Effects of the Louisville Enterprise Zone Incentives: A Response to Zhang.

Abstract

Zhang (2019) has written that variations in research design have led to conflicting or mixed reviews of many local economic development policies that are based on the enterprise zone concept. She mentions a study and an article (Lambert 1997, Lambert and Coomes 2001) on the Louisville, Kentucky enterprise zone (EZ) and implies the time horizon used to evaluate it was too short. This research note points out that the Louisville EZ went through multiple transformations and expansions over its history from 1983 to 2003, and as noted in the first of two studies, the original zone showed virtually no progress from 1983 to 1990. Several other unpublished papers pointed out the same results when the original EZ and other parts of the expanded EZ were analyzed up to the last years of the 20th Century. Finally, this paper argues that and provides reasons for the methodology employed by Lambert and Coomes (2001) is a superior way of analyzing the Louisville EZ when compared to the methods employed by Zhang (2015). The main reason why Zhang (2015) shows success in the EZ is because she evaluates it in its final form in the late 1990s after it had annexed many sections of Jefferson County which were not as nearly economically disadvantaged as the original Louisville EZ established in 1983.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: economic development, enterprise zones, industrial incentives, research design
• Subjects: R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R11 - Regional Economic Activity: Growth, Development, Environmental Issues, and Changes; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R38 - Government Policy; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R52 - Land Use and Other Regulations; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R53 - Public Facility Location Analysis ; Public Investment and Capital Stock; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R58 - Regional Development Planning and Policy

References

Cummings, Scott B. and Lambert, Thomas E. 1997. A Performance Evaluation of Louisville’s Enterprise Zone. Louisville, KY: University of Louisville, Urban Studies Institute, Center for Policy Research and Evaluation. May 1997.

Davidson, Joe. 1992. “An Enterprise Zone Just Grows and Grows around Louisville, Ky.” The Wall Street Journal, August 26, pages A1 and A2.

Hall, Peter. 1977. ‘Green Fields and Grey Areas.’ In Proceedings of Royal Town Planning Institute Annual Conference, Chester. London: Royal Town Planning Institute.

____________. 1982. ‘Enterprise Zones: A Justification.’ International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 6(3), pp. 416-421.

Heath, David. 1991. “Enterprise Zones: A Hollow Promise.” The Courier-Journal, December 1, pages A1 and A18.

____________. 1992. “Kentucky Enterprise Zones’ Legality Questioned: Attorney General’s Office Says Aiding 10 Areas Arbitrary.” The Courier-Journal, May 16, page B12.

Kentucky Legislative Research Commission. 2002. The Costs, Benefits, and Monitoring of Kentucky’s Enterprise Zones. Frankfort, KY: Program Review and Investigations Committee Staff Report.

Kentucky Revised Statutes. 1994 Edition. Kentucky Revised Statues, Subchapter 45: Enterprise Zone Development. Pages 412-423.

Lambert, Thomas E. 1997. A Program Evaluation of the Louisville Enterprise Zone: A Study of Local Planning and Economic Development. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Louisville, Louisville, KY.

Lambert, Thomas E. and Paul A. Coomes. 2001. “An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Louisville’s Enterprise Zone.”. Economic Development Quarterly, 15(2), May 2001: 168-180. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Lambert, Thomas E. and John P. Nelson, III. 2002. A Second Look at Louisville’s Enterprise Zone and a Review of Other Local Business Incentives. September 2002. Published by School of Business, Spalding University with City of Louisville funds.

Lambert, Thomas E. 2003. “ Kentucky Enterprise Zones Benefited Big Businesses, not Small Entrepreneurs and Neighborhoods: An Update to ‘An Evaluation of the Effectiveness of Louisville’s Enterprise Zone,’ by Lambert and Coomes (2001). Unpublished Manuscript.

Office of State Budget Director. 2002. ‘The Costs of Kentucky’s Enterprise Zones.’ Policy Paper Series 2, Issue 1, January 2002. Frankfort, KY: Commonwealth of Kentucky.

Richards-Hill, Toya. 2003. ‘Enterprise Zone Program's End Means More Expenses for Participating Companies.’ Business First, June 2, 2001. http://www.bizjournals.com/louisville/stories/2003/06/02/story2.html . Accessed on January 6, 2013.

U. S. Bureau of the Census, County Business Patterns for Kentucky, 1980 through 2004 editions. Washington, D.C.: Department of Commerce. Data for 2004 to 2017 can be found at https://factfinder.census.gov/faces/tableservices/jsf/pages/productview.xhtml?pid=BP_2004_00CZ1&prodType=table . Accessed on December 15, 2019. Years prior to 1986 can now be found on the website of the US National Archives, https://catalog.archives.gov/id/613576 .

______________________, 1980 Census of Population and Housing, Washington, D. C.: Department of Commerce.

_______________________, 1990 Census of Population and Housing. Washington, D. C.: Department of Commerce.

_______________________, 2000 Census of Population and Housing. Washington, D. C.: Department of Commerce.

_______________________, n.d. Transportation Analysis Zone definition. https://factfinder.census.gov/help/en/traffic_analysis_zone_taz.htm . Accessed on December 12, 2019.