On the Inconsistency of Nonparametric Bootstraps for the Subvector Anderson-Rubin Test

Wang, Wenjie (2020): On the Inconsistency of Nonparametric Bootstraps for the Subvector Anderson-Rubin Test.

Abstract

Bootstrap procedures based on instrumental variable (IV) estimates or t-statistics are generally invalid when the instruments are weak. The bootstrap may even fail when applied to identification-robust test statistics. For subvector inference based on the Anderson-Rubin (AR) statistic, Wang and Doko Tchatoka (2018) show that the residual bootstrap is inconsistent under weak IVs. In particular, the residual bootstrap depends on certain estimator of structural parameters to generate bootstrap pseudo-data, while the estimator is inconsistent under weak IVs. It is thus tempting to consider nonparametric bootstrap. In this note, under the assumptions of conditional homoskedasticity and one nuisance structural parameter, we investigate the bootstrap consistency for the subvector AR statistic based on the nonparametric i.i.d. bootstap and its recentered version proposed by Hall and Horowitz (1996). We find that both procedures are inconsistent under weak IVs: although able to mimic the weak-identification situation in the data, both procedures result in approximation errors, which leads to the discrepancy between the bootstrap world and the original sample. In particular, both bootstrap tests can be very conservative under weak IVs.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Nonparametric Bootstrap; Weak Identification; Weak Instrument; Subvector Inference; Anderson-Rubin Test.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C12 - Hypothesis Testing: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C26 - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation

References

Andrews, D. W., 2017. Identification-robust subvector inference. Technical report, Cowles Foundation Discussion Paper 2105.

Andrews, D. W., Guggenberger, P., 2010. Asymptotic size and a problem with subsampling and with the m out of n bootstrap. Econometric Theory 26(2), 426–468.

Andrews, I., Stock, J. H., Sun, L., 2019. Weak instruments in instrumental variables regression: Theory and practice. Annual Review of Economics 11, 727–753.

Giurcanu, M., Presnell, B., 2018. Bootstrap inference for misspecified moment condition models. Annals of the Institute of Statistical Mathematics 70(3), 605–630.

Gonçalves, S. , White, H., 2004. Maximum likelihood and the bootstrap for nonlinear dynamic models. Journal of Econometrics 119(1), 199–219.

Guggenberger, P., Kleibergen, F., Mavroeidis, S., 2019. A more powerful subvector Anderson rubin test in linear instrumental variables regression. Quantitative Economics 10(2), 487–526.

Guggenberger, P., Kleibergen, F., Mavroeidis, S., Chen, L., 2012. On the asymptotic sizes of subset anderson–rubin and lagrange multiplier tests in linear instrumental variables regression. Econometrica 80(6), 2649–2666.

Hall, P., Horowitz, J. L., 1996. Bootstrap critical values for tests based on generalized-method-ofmoments estimators. Econometrica 64(4), 891–916.

Kleibergen, F., 2019. Efficient size correct subset inference in homoskedastic linear instrumental variables regression. Technical report, University of Amsterdam.

Moreira, M. J., Porter, J., Suarez, G., 2009. Bootstrap validity for the score test when instruments may be weak. Journal of Econometrics 149(1), 52–64.

Wang, W. , Doko Tchatoka, F. , 2018. On bootstrap inconsistency and bonferroni-based sizecorrection for the subset anderson–rubin test under conditional homoskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 207(1), 188–211.

Young, A., 2019. Consistency without inference: Instrumental variables in practical application. Technical report, London School of Economics.