Chandan, Roy (2016): Inclusive trade in Indian silk industry during post globalized era. Published in: International Trade and Inclusive Development: Emerging Issues and Enlarging Debate (January 2017): pp. 127-146.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_102322.pdf Download (281kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This article addresses the question of whether free international trade flow in silk industry, especially in the post MFA regime, could usher inclusive development in that specific sector. I propose ‘employment’ and ‘production’ as the two parameters of inclusive development in this sector and derived initially cohesion, though weak, of this parameter with earnings from exports of silk and silk goods. However, analyzing the secondary data over the post globalized era (1995-96 to 2014-15), I conclude that ‘inclusive development’ which have virtually taken place in Indian sericulture sector is not originated from free flow of international trade, rather ‘land productivity’ is conducive to inclusive development in this sector.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Inclusive trade in Indian silk industry during post globalized era |
English Title: | Inclusive trade in Indian silk industry during post globalized era |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Sericulture, Silk, Inclusive Development, Land Productivity, Export Earnings |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F10 - General F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization F - International Economics > F6 - Economic Impacts of Globalization > F60 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O13 - Agriculture ; Natural Resources ; Energy ; Environment ; Other Primary Products R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R12 - Size and Spatial Distributions of Regional Economic Activity |
Item ID: | 102322 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Chandan Roy |
Date Deposited: | 13 Aug 2020 07:54 |
Last Modified: | 13 Aug 2020 07:54 |
References: | Anand, Rahul, Saurabh Mishra, and Shanaka J. Peiris (2013): “Inclusive Growth – Measurements and Determinants”, IMF Working Paper, WP/13/135. Barua, Alokesh and Pavel Chakraborty (2010): “Does Openness affect Regional Inequality? A Case Study for India”, Review of Development Economics, Vol. 14, No. 3, pp 447-465. Central Silk Board (1999): Compendium of Statistics of Silk Industry, CSB, Ministry of Textiles, GOI. Central Silk Board (2003): Sericulture & Silk Industry Statistics- 2003, CSB, Ministry of Textiles, GOI. Central Silk Board (2010): Annual Report 209-10, CSB, Ministry of Textiles, GOI Central Silk Board (2011): Annual Report 2010-11, CSB, Ministry of Textiles, GOI Central Silk Board (2012): Annual Report 2011-12, CSB, Ministry of Textiles, GOI Central Silk Board (online) : Sericulture At Glance (2002-2007), (2008-2012) Commission on Growth and Development (2008): Growth Report- Strategies for Sustained Growth and Inclusive Development, The World Bank. Dollar, David, & Aart Kraay (2002): “Growth is Good for Poor”, Journal of Economic Growth, Vol. 7 (3), pp. 195-225. Doshi, Gaurav (2006): Indian Silk Industry, http://EzineArticles.com/364907 viewed on 28.10.2013. Exim Bank of India (1991): How Import Intensive are Indian Exports ?, Exim Bank of India, Occasional Paper No.16, Dec 1991. Exim Bank of India (2002): Indian Silk Industry – A Sector Study, Exim Bank of India, Occasional Paper No. 90. Feng, Liu, Sun Shimim, and Qiao Xianjuan (2009): “China-Indian Silk Trade – Current Production and Future Prospects”, Chinese Journal of Population, Resources and Environment, Vol.7, No.2. Gaur, Achal Kumar (2010): Regional Disparities in Economic Growth, A Case Study of Indian States, Paper presented on 31st General Conference of the International Association for Research in Income and Wealth, St. Geneva, Switzerland, www. iariw.org Hanumappa H G and Erappa S (1986): “Economic Issues in Sericulture – Study of Karnataka”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XX No.13, pp .1322-1324. Hashim, Danish (2005) : “Post MFA - Making the Textile and Garment Industry Competitive”, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XL (2), pp 117-127. Ianchovichina, Elena and Susanna Lundstorm Gable (2009) : “What is Inclusive Growth ?” Unpublished mimeo, World Bank, PRMED, Washington D.C. Ianchovichina, Elena and Susanna Lundstrom Gable (2012): What is Inclusive Growth in Low-Income Countries, ed by R. Arezki, C. Pattillo, M. Quintyn and M. Zhu, International Monetary Fund. Imbs, J. and R. Wacziarg (2003): Strategies for Diversification, American Economic Review, Vol. 93(1), pp.63-86. IMF (2011): Regional Economic Outlook- Asia Pacific, October, Washington, DC. Institute of Applied Manpower & Research (2002): Report on Comparative Backwardness on North Bengal Region, A study sponsored by Planning Commission, IAMR, GOI. Jay Mazur (2000): Labour’s New Internationalism, Foreign Affair, Vol. 79, Jan-Feb, 2000. Joseph, K.J. (2010): “Inclusive Innovation System in Plantation Sector- The State Database and Its Limits”, NRPPD Discussion Paper, Centre for Development Studies, Trivandram. Kakwani,Nanak and E. Pernia (2000): “What is Pro-Poor Growth?” Asian Development Review, Vol. 18 (1), pp.1-16. Kanbur, Ravi (2010): Regional Disparities and Indian Development, Contribution to Vox-India (http://kanbur.dyson.cornell.edu/papers/Regional%20Disparities%20and%20Indian%20Development.pdf) viewed on 28.8.2013. Kraay, Aart (2004): “When Growth is Pro-poor? Cross-country Evidence”, IMF Working Paper, No. 04/47. Lederman, Daniel (2011) : International Trade and Inclusive Growth, The World Bank, Poverty Reduction and Economic Management Network. Margit, Sugata, Saibal Kar and Dibyendu S. Maiti (2007): “Regional Trade Openness Index and Income Disparity – A New Methodology and the Indian Experience”, CSSS, Kolkata. Matttigatti R, Srinivasa G, Iyenger M N S, Dutta R K & R G Geetha Devi (2000): “Price Spread in Silk Industry- An Economic Analysis”, Indian Journal of Sericulture, Vol. 39 (2), pp- 163-164. Mukherjee, Rila (1994): “The Story of Kassimbazar: Silk Merchants & Commerce in Eighteenth Century India”, Review, Vol. 17(4), pp 499-554. Nabar-Bhaduri, Suranjana (2012): “Free Trade and Inclusive Development – Lessons from Indian Experience”, Issues in Brief, Boston University, The Frederick S Parade Centre, USA. Naranpanawa, Athula and Rashmi Arora (2012): “Trade Liberalization and Regional Disparities: Evidence from a Multi-Regional Equilibrium Model of India”, Presented at 15th Annual Conference on Global Economic Analysis, June 27-29, Geneva, Switzerland. OECD (2012): “India- Sustaining High Growth and Inclusive Growth”, OECD Better Policies Series, Oct 2012. Planning Commission of India (2008): Indian Planning Commission, 11th Five Year Plan (2007-2012)- Inclusive Growth, Vol. 1, Indian Planning Commission, Oxford University Press. Ravallion, Martin and Shaohua Chen (2003): “Measuring Pro-poor Growth”, Economic Letters, Vol. 78, No.1, pp 3-99. Ray Chaudhuri, Bibek and Debottam Chakraborty (2010): Export Potential at the State Level- A Case Study of Karnataka, IIFT, Working Paper, No. EC-10/02. Roy, Chandan (2013): “Economic Backwardness of Uttar Dinajpur- A Block Level Analysis” in D. Roy (Ed) Economy of North Bengal (National Library Publishers, India) pp. 484-501. Roy, Chandan, Sanchari Roy Mukherjee and Santanu Ghosh (2012): “Sericulture as an Employment Generating Household Industry in West Bengal: A Study on its Current Problems and Prospects”, Artha Beekshan, Vol.21, No.3. pp. 131-155. Samuel P.Jacob (2000) : Strategies for Silk Export Promotion, Indian Silk, Jan-Feb. Sinha, Sanjay (1989): Development Impact of Silk Production- A Wealth of Opportunities, Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XXIV. No.3, pp.157-163. Umesh, K.B. Akshara, M.B. Shripad, B. Harish, K. and S M. Srinivasan (2009): Performance Analysis of Production and Trade of Indian Silk Industry under WTO Regime, Paper presented at International Association of Agricultural Economists Conference, Beijing, China, August 16-22, 2009. United Nations (1994): Silks in Asia, Economic and Social Commission for Asia and the Pacific United Nations (2011): Compact for Inclusive Growth and Prosperity, Report of the UN Secretary General’s Eminent Persons Group on Least Developed Countries. White, H. and E. Anderson (2000): Growth Vs Redistribution – Does the Pattern of Growth Matter? Development Policy Review, Vol. 19(3), pp. 167-289. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/102322 |