The Interest Rate in a Monetary Economy

Kehrwald, Bernie (2014): The Interest Rate in a Monetary Economy.

Abstract

Major central banks have pointed out that basic economic models describe the monetary system inaccurately. In this context, the current paper presents a model of interest rate determination based on a sound description of the monetary system. Its novelty is providing an alternative credit supply function that represents planned savings. Further, the model is compared with three standard theories. The main conclusions are threefold. First, under certain assumptions, the viewpoint of loanable funds theory that the interest rate balances savings and investments can be reconciled with a monetary economy. However, the balancing process is not a market mechanism. Loanable funds theory must therefore be reinterpreted. Second, liquidity preference theory is insufficient to explain the interest rate level in a modern monetary economy. Third, endogenous money theory describes a monetary economy correctly in principle, but it is incomplete without the above-mentioned credit supply function.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: interest rate, money, loanable funds, liquidity preference, endogenous money
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E40 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E50 - General; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E51 - Money Supply ; Credit ; Money Multipliers

References

Ackley, Gardner. 1957. “Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds Theories of Interest: Comment.” American Economic Review 47 (5): 662-673.

Bank of England 2014. “Money Creation in the Modern Economy.” Quarterly Bulletin Q1.

Bibow, Jörg. 2001. “The Loanable Funds Fallacy: Exercises in the Analysis of Disequilibrium.” Cambridge Journal of Economics 25 (5): 591-616.

Blanchard, Olivier and Gerhard Illing. 2009. Makroökonomie, 5th edition. Hallbergmoos: Pearson Studium.

Bundesbank 2017. “Die Rolle von Banken, Nichtbanken und Zentralbank im Geldschöpfungsprozess.” Monatsbericht, April.

Fellner, William and Harold Somers. 1941. “Alternative Monetary Approaches to Interest Theory.” Review of Economics and Statistics 23 (1): 43-48.

Foley, Duncan. 1975. “On Two Specifications of Asset Equilibrium in Macroeconomic Models.” Journal of Political Economy 83 (2): 303-324.

Johnson, Harry. 1951. “Some Cambridge Controversies in Monetary Theory.” Review of Economic Studies 19 (2): 90-104.

Keynes, John Maynard. 1936. The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, 15th edition. London: St. Martin’s Press for the Royal Economic Society.

Keynes, John Maynard. 1937a. “Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest.” Economic Journal 47 (June): 241-252.

Keynes, John Maynard. 1937b. “The “Ex-Ante” Theory of the Rate of Interest.” Economic Journal 47 (December): 663-669.

Lavoie, Marc. 1984. “The Endogenous Flow of Credit and the Post Keynesian Theory of Money.” Journal of Economic Issues 18 (September): 771-97.

Lavoie, Marc. 1996. “Horizontalism, Structuralism, Liquidity Preference and the Principle of Increasing Risk.” Scottish Journal of Political Economy 43 (August): 275-300.

Lavoie, Marc. 2006. “Endogenous Money: Accommodationist.” In A Handbook of Alternative Monetary Economics, edited by Philip Arestis and Malcolm Sawyer. Cheltenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Lerner, Abba. 1938. “Alternative Formulations of the Theory of Interest.” Economic Journal 48 (June): 211-230.

Lindner, Fabian. 2015. “Does Saving Increase the Supply of Credit? A Critique of Loanable Funds Theory.” World Economic Review 4: 1-26.

Moore, Basil. 1988. Horizontalists and Verticalists: The Macroeconomics of Credit Money. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ohlin, Bertil. 1937a. “Some Notes on the Stockholm Theory of Savings and Investment I.” Economic Journal 47 (March): 53-69.

Ohlin, Bertil. 1937b. “Some Notes on the Stockholm Theory of Savings and Investment II.” Economic Journal 47 (June): 221-240.

Ohlin, Bertil, Dennis Robertson, and Ralph Hawtrey. 1937. “Alternative Theories of the Rate of Interest: Three Rejoinders.” Economic Journal 47 (September): 428-436.

Palley, Thomas. 2013. “Horizontalists, Verticalists, and Structuralists: The Theory of Endogenous Money Reassessed.” Review of Keynesian Economics 1 (4): 406-424.

Palley, Thomas. 2015. “Money, Fiscal Policy, and Interest Rates: A Critique of Modern Monetary Theory.” Review of Political Economy 27 (1): 1-23.

Patinkin, Don. 1958. “Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds: Stock and Flow Analysis.” Economica, New Series 25 (100): 300-318.

Robertson, Dennis. 1938. ‘Mr. Keynes and “Finance”.’ Economic Journal 48 (June): 314-318.

Snippe, Jan. 1985. “Loanable Funds Theory versus Liquidity Preference Theory.” De Economist 133 (2): 129-150.

Stiglitz, Joseph and Bruce Greenwald 2003. Towards a New Paradigm in Monetary Economics, Raffaele Mattioli Lectures. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Tsiang, Sho-Chieh. 1956. “Liquidity Preference and Loanable Funds Theories, Multiplier and Velocity Analysis: A Synthesis.” American Economic Review 46 (4): 539-564.

Tsiang, Sho-Chieh. 1980. ‘Keynes’s “Finance” Demand for Liquidity, Robertson’s Loanable Funds Theory, and Friedman’s Monetarism.’ Quarterly Journal of Economics 94 (3):467-491.

Wicksell, Knut. 1907. “The Influence of the Rate of Interest on Prices.” History of Economic Thought Articles 17: 213-220.