Vo, Duc (2019): Information Theory and an Entropic Approach to an Analysis of Fiscal Inequality. Published in: Entropy
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_103291.pdf Download (618kB) | Preview |
Abstract
In his influential study, Theil (1967) developed the notion of entropy on the basis of information theory. He then advocated the use of entropy-based measure for the analysis of income inequality. In this paper, the first of its kind, we apply Theil’s notion of entropy to public finances in multi-tiered governments, in particular for a measurement of fiscal decentralisation, which is currently very crude in terms of the ratio between local government revenue and total revenue. It is the claim of this paper that such an approach of measuring fiscal decentralisation completely ignores important distributional aspects of fiscal arrangements. Findings from this paper indicate that studies on measuring various aspects of fiscal activities—such as fiscal decentralisation—should carefully take into account the dispersion of revenue (and expenditure) across regions. On that basis, the entropic approach developed in this paper is able to accommodate these dispersions across subnational governments. As an illustration for the case of Vietnam, the true degree of fiscal decentralization has e�ectively been decreased in comparison with estimates from other simple measurements due to the presence of substantial dispersions of revenue and expenditure from the subnational governments across 63 provinces in Vietnam
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Information Theory and an Entropic Approach to an Analysis of Fiscal Inequality |
English Title: | Information Theory and an Entropic Approach to an Analysis of Fiscal Inequality |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | entropy; dispersion; entropic approach; fiscal decentralisation; measurement |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods H - Public Economics > H1 - Structure and Scope of Government > H11 - Structure, Scope, and Performance of Government H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H27 - Other Sources of Revenue H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H50 - General H - Public Economics > H7 - State and Local Government ; Intergovernmental Relations > H77 - Intergovernmental Relations ; Federalism ; Secession |
Item ID: | 103291 |
Depositing User: | Dr Duc Hong Vo |
Date Deposited: | 20 Oct 2020 08:12 |
Last Modified: | 20 Oct 2020 08:12 |
References: | 1. Ahmad, E.; Craig, J. Intergovernmental transfers. In Fiscal Federalism in Theory and Practice; Ter-Minassian, T., Ed.; International Monetary Fund: Washington, DC, USA, 1997. 2. Bird, R.M.; Smart, M. Intergovernmental Fiscal Transfers: International Lessons for Developing Countries; University of Toronto: Toronto, ON, Canada, 2002. 3. McLure, C.; Martinez-Vazquez, J. The Assignment of Revenues and Expenditures in Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2000. 4.Musgrave, R.A. The Theory of Public Finance—A Study in Public Economy; McGraw Hill Book Company, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1959. 5. Shah, A. Expenditure Assignment in Intergovernmental Fiscal Relations and Local Financial Management Program; The World Bank: Washington, DC, USA, 2004. 6.Tiebout, C.M. A pure theory of local expenditures. J. Polit. Econ. 1956, 64, 416–424. [CrossRef] 7.Oates, W.E. Fiscal Federalism; Harcourt Brace Jovanovich, Inc.: New York, NY, USA, 1972. 8. Woller, G.M.; Phillips, K. Fiscal decentralization and LDC economic growth: An empirical investigation. J. Dev. Stud. 1998, 34, 139–148. [CrossRef] 9. Akai, N.; Sakata, M. Fiscal decentralization contributes to economic growth: Evidence from state-level cross-section data for the United States. J. Urban Econ. 2002, 52, 93–108. [CrossRef] 10. Davoodi, H.; Zou, H. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth: A Cross-Country Study. J. Urban Econ. 1998, 43, 244–257. [CrossRef] 11. Lin, J.Y.; Liu, Z. Fiscal Decentralization and Economic Growth in China. Econ. Dev. Cult. Change 2000, 49, 1921. [CrossRef] 12. Thieben, U. Fiscal Decentralisation and Economic Growth in High-Income OECD Countries. Fisc. Stud. 2003, 24, 237–274. 13. Zhang, T.; Zou, H. Fiscal decentralization, public spending, and economic growth in China. J. Public Econ. 1998, 67, 221–240. [CrossRef] 14. Martinez-Vazquez, J.; Lago-Penas, S.; Sacchi, A. The impact of fiscal decentralisation: A survey. J. Econ. Surv. 2016, 31, 1095–1129. [CrossRef] 15. Liu, Y.; Martinez, J.; Wu, A. Fiscal decentralization, equalization, and intra-provincial inequality in China. Int. Tax Public Financ. 2017, 24, 248–281. [CrossRef] 16. Theil, H. Economics and Information Theory; North-Holland Publishing Company: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 1967. 17.Vo, D.H. The Economics of Fiscal decentralization. J. Econ. Surv. 2010, 24, 657–679. [CrossRef] 18. Vo, D.H. Fiscal decentralisation in Vietnam: Lessons from selected Asian nations. J. Asia Pac. Econ. 2009, 14, 399–419. [CrossRef] |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/103291 |