Prediction for the 2020 United States Presidential Election using Machine Learning Algorithm: Lasso Regression

Sinha, Pankaj and Verma, Aniket and Shah, Purav and Singh, Jahnavi and Panwar, Utkarsh (2020): Prediction for the 2020 United States Presidential Election using Machine Learning Algorithm: Lasso Regression.

Abstract

This paper aims at determining the various economic and non-economic factors that can influence the voting behaviour in the forthcoming United States Presidential Election using Lasso regression, a Machine learning algorithm. Even though contemporary discussions on the subject of the United States Presidential Election suggest that the level of unemployment in the economy will be a significant factor in determining the result of the election, in our study, it has been found that the rate of unemployment will not be the only significant factor in forecasting the election. However, various other economic factors such as the inflation rate, rate of economic growth, and exchange rates will not have a significant influence on the election result. The June Gallup Rating, is not the only significant factor for determining the result of the forthcoming presidential election. In addition to the June Gallup Rating, various other non-economic factors such as the performance of the contesting political parties in the midterm elections, Campaign spending by the contesting parties and scandals of the Incumbent President will also play a significant role in determining the result of the forthcoming United States Presidential Election. The paper explores the influence of all the aforementioned economic and non-economic factors on the voting behaviour of the voters in the forthcoming United States Presidential Election. The proposed Lasso Regression model forecasts that the vote share for the incumbent Republican Party to be 41.63% in the 2020 US presidential election. This means that the incumbent party is most likely to lose the upcoming election.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: US Presidential Election, Machine Learning, Lasso Regression, Economic Factors, None Economic Factor, Forecasting, Prediction
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C10 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C15 - Statistical Simulation Methods: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C8 - Data Collection and Data Estimation Methodology ; Computer Programs

References

1. Lewis-Beck, M. S. & Rice, T. W. (1982).Presidential Popularity and Presidential Vote. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 46 4, 534-537.

2. Fair, R. C. (1978). The effect of economic events on votes for president. Review of Economics and Statistics, 60, 159-173.

Fair, R.C. (2016). Vote-Share Equations: November 2014 update, retrieved from http://fairmodel.econ.yale.edu/vote2016/index2.htm.

3. Silver, N. (2011). On the Maddeningly Inexact Relationship between Unemployment and Re-Election, retrieved from http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2011/06/02/on-themaddeningly- inexact-relationship-between-unemployment-and-re-election/.

4. Jérôme, Bruno & Jérôme -Speziari, Veronique. (2011). Forecasting the 2012 U.S. Presidential Election: What Can We Learn from a State Level Political Economy Model. In Proceedings of the APSA Annual meeting Seattle, September 1-4 2011.

5. Cuzán, A. G., Heggen R.J., & Bundrick C.M. (2000). Fiscal policy, economic conditions, and terms in office: simulating presidential election outcomes. In Proceedings of the World Congress of the Systems Sciences and ISSS International Society for the Systems Sciences, 44th Annual Meeting, July 16–20, Toronto, Canada.

6. Abramowitz A. I. (1988). An Improved Model for Predicting the Outcomes of Presidential Elections. PS: Political Science and Politics, 21 4, 843-847.

7. Lichtman, A. J. (2005). The Keys to the White House. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.

Lichtman, A. J. (2008). The keys to the white house: An index forecast for 2008. International Journal of Forecasting, 24, 301–309.

8. Erikson, R. S., and Wlezien, C. (1996). Of time and presidential election forecasts. PS: Political Science and politics, 31, 37-39.

9. Hibbs D. A. (2000). Bread and Peace voting in U.S. presidential elections. Public Choice, 104, 149–180.

Hibbs, Douglas A. (2012). Obama’s Re-election Prospects Under ‘Bread and Peace’ Voting in the 2012 US Presidential Election. Retrieved from: http://www.douglas-hibbs.com/HibbsArticles/HIBBS_OBAMA-REELECT-31July2012r1.pdf.

10. Sinha, P. and Bansal, A.K. (2008). Hierarchical Bayes Prediction for the 2008 US Presidential Election. The Journal of Prediction Markets, 2, 47-60.

11. Mueller J.E. (1970), Presidential Popularity from Truman to Johnson. The American Political science review, 64, 18-34. 22.

12. Usinflationcalculator.com (2020). Current US Inflation Rates: 2009-2020. Retrieved from https://www.usinflationcalculator.com/inflation/current-inflation-rates/#:~:text=The%20annual%20inflation%20rate%20for,published%20on%20October%2013%2C%202020

13. Bureau of Labor Statistics (2020). Civilian Unemployment Rate. Retrieved from https://www.bls.gov/charts/employment-situation/civilian-unemployment-rate.htm

14. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2020). Real GDP Per Capita. Retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/A939RX0Q048SBEA#0

15. National Mining Association. Historical Gold Prices, 1833 to Present. Retrieved from https://nma.org/wp-content/uploads/2019/02/his_gold_prices_1833_pres_2019.pdf

16. Inflationdata.com (2020). Historical Crude Oil Price (Table). Retrieved from https://inflationdata.com/articles/inflation-adjusted-prices/historical-crude-oil-prices-table/

17. Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis, retrieved from https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/EXUSUK

18. Gallup Presidential Poll. (2016). Presidential Job Approval Centre. Retrieved from https://news.gallup.com/poll/203198/presidential-approval-ratings-donald-trump.aspx

19. DisasterCenter.com (2020). US Crime Rates 1960-2019. Retrieved from http://www.disastercenter.com/crime/uscrime.htm

20. History, Art and Archives, US House of Representatives (2020). Election Statistics, 1920 to Present. Retrieved from https://history.house.gov/Institution/Election-Statistics/Election-Statistics/

21. Federal Election Commission (2020). Campaign Finance Data (2020) Biden for President. Retrieved from https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00703975/?tab=spending

22. Federal Election Commission (2020). Campaign Finance Data Donald J. Trump. Retrieved from https://www.fec.gov/data/committee/C00580100/?tab=spending&cycle=2020

23. BBC.com (2020). Trump impeachment: The short, medium and long story. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-49800181