On the stability of risk and time preferences amid the COVID-19 pandemic

Drichoutis, Andreas C. and Nayga, Rodolfo (2020): On the stability of risk and time preferences amid the COVID-19 pandemic.

Abstract

We elicited incentivized and stated measures of risk and time preferences from a sample of undergraduate students in Athens, Greece, as part of a battery of psychological, behavioral and economic measures and traits that could be later matched with data from laboratory experiments. Data collection for these measures was first initiated in 2017 and the exact same battery of measures was administered in 2019 and early 2020 to students of the university that had voluntarily enrolled to participate in surveys/experiments. About halfway through the 2020 wave, our study was re-designed because of the COVID-19 pandemic. We re-launched our study on March 23, 2020, coinciding with a general curfew imposed by the government, and invited back all subjects that had participated in the 2019 and the early 2020 wave. The exact same sets of incentivized and stated measures of risk and time preferences were administered to the invited subjects and the wave duration was extended until a few weeks after the opening up of the economy and restart of business activity that followed the curfew. We then estimated structural parameters for various theories of risk and time preferences from the incentivized tasks and find no effect between the different waves or other key events of the pandemic, despite the fact that we have about 1,000 responses across all waves. Similar conclusions come out of the stated preferences measures. Overall, our subjects exhibit intertemporal stability of risk and time preferences despite the very disruptive effect of the COVID-19 pandemic on the global economy.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: time preferences; risk preferences; pandemic; natural disaster
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C90 - General; D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D12 - Consumer Economics: Empirical Analysis; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; D - Microeconomics > D9 - Intertemporal Choice > D91 - Intertemporal Household Choice ; Life Cycle Models and Saving; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming

References

Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. Lau, and E. E. Rutstrom (2018). Multiattribute utility theory, intertemporal utility and correlation aversion. International Economic Review 59 (2), 537-555.

Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. I. Lau, and E. E. Rutstrom (2008a). Eliciting risk and time preferences. Econometrica 76 (3), 583-618.

Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. I. Lau, and E. E. Rutstrom (2008b). Lost in state space: Are preferences stable? International Economic Review 49 (3), 1091-1112.

Andersen, S., G. W. Harrison, M. I. Lau, and E. E. Rutstrom (2014). Discounting behavior: A reconsideration. European Economic Review 71, 15-33.

Angrisani, M., M. Cipriani, A. Guarino, R. Kendall, and J. Ortiz de Zarate Pina (2020). Risk preferences at the time of covid-19: An experiment with professional traders and students. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 15108.

Anzolin, E. and A. Amante (2020, February 21). Coronavirus outbreak grows in northern Italy, 16 cases reported in one day. Available at https://web:archive:org/web/20200816091931/ https://www:reuters:com/article/us-china-health-italy/coronavirus-outbreak-grows-in-northern-italy-16-cases-reported-in-one-day-idUSKBN20F0UI. Last accessed on August 16, 2020.

Arslan, R. C., M. Brommer, T. Dohmen, J. Drewelies, R. Hertwig, and G. G. Wagner (2020). How people know their risk preference. CESifo Working Paper Series No. 8586.

Beine, M., G. Charness, A. Dupuy, and M. Joxhe (2020). Shaking things up: On the stability of risk and time preferences. IZA Discussion Papers No. 13084.

Bellucci, D., G. Fuochi, and P. Conzo (2020). Childhood exposure to the second world war and financial risk taking in adult life. Journal of Economic Psychology 79, 102196.

Bu, D., T. Hanspal, Y. Liao, and Y. Liu (2020). Risk taking during a global crisis: Evidence from Wuhan. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3559870 .

Callen, M. (2015). Catastrophes and time preference: Evidence from the indian ocean earthquake. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 118, 199 - 214.

Callen, M., M. Isaqzadeh, J. D. Long, and C. Sprenger (2014, January). Violence and risk preference: Experimental evidence from afghanistan. American Economic Review 104 (1), 123-48.

Cameron, L. and M. Shah (2015). Risk-taking behavior in the wake of natural disasters. Journal of Human Resources 50 (2), 484-515.

Cassar, A., A. Healy, and C. von Kessler (2017). Trust, risk, and time preferences after a natural disaster: Experimental evidence from thailand. World Development 94, 90 - 105.

Chuang, Y. and L. Schechter (2015). Stability of experimental and survey measures of risk, time, and social preferences: A review and some new results. Journal of Development Economics 117, 151 - 170.

Clarke, K. A. (2003). Nonparametric model discrimination in international relations. Journal of Conflict Resolution 47 (1), 72-93.

Coller, M. and M. Williams (1999). Eliciting individual discount rates. Experimental Economics 2 (2), 107-127.

Crosetto, P. and A. Filippin (2012). The \bomb" risk elicitation task. SOEPpapers on Multi-disciplinary Panel Data Research No 517.

Dohmen, T., A. Falk, D. Huffman, U. Sunde, J. Schupp, and G. G. Wagner (2011). Individual risk attitudes: Measurement, determinants, and behavioral consequences. Journal of the European Economic Association 9 (3), 522-550.

Drichoutis, A. and A. Vassilopoulos (2016). Intertemporal stability of survey-based measures of risk and time preferences over a three-year course. Working Papers 2016-3, Agricultural University of Athens, Department Of Agricultural Economics.

Drichoutis, A. C., P. Lazaridis, and J. R. M. Nayga (2006). Heteroskedasticity, the single crossing property and ordered response models. Economics Bulletin 3 (31), 1-6.

Drichoutis, A. C. and J. L. Lusk (2016). What can multiple price lists really tell us about risk preferences? Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 53 (2), 89-106.

Eckel, C. C., M. A. El-Gamal, and R. K. Wilson (2009). Risk loving after the storm: A bayesian-network study of hurricane Katrina evacuees. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 69 (2), 110 - 124.

Greene, W. H. and D. A. Hensher (2010). Modeling ordered choices: A primer. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

Greiner, B. (2015). Subject pool recruitment procedures: Organizing experiments with ORSEE. Journal of the Economic Science Association 1 (1), 114-125.

Hanaoka, C., H. Shigeoka, and Y. Watanabe (2018, April). Do risk preferences change? Evidence from the great east japan earthquake. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics 10 (2), 298-330.

Harrison, G. W., M. I. Lau, and M. B. Williams (2002). Estimating individual discount rates in denmark: A field experiment. The American Economic Review 92 (5), 1606-1617.

Harrison, G. W. and J. M. Ng (2016). Evaluating the expected welfare gain from insurance. Journal of Risk and Insurance 83 (1), 91-120.

Harrison, G. W. and J. T. Swarthout (2021). Cumulative prospect theory in the laboratory: A reconsideration. In G. W. Harrison and D. Ross (Eds.), Models of Risk Preferences: Descriptive and Normative Challenges. Bingley, Emerald, UK.

Holt, C. A. (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. The American Economic Review 76 (3), 508-515.

Holt, C. A. and S. K. Laury (2002). Risk aversion and incentive effects. The American Economic Review 92 (5), 1644-1655.

Ikeda, S., E. Yamamura, and Y. Tsutsui (2020). COVID-19 enhanced diminishing sensitivity in prospect-theory risk preferences: A panel analysis. Discussion Paper No. 1106, The Institute of Social and Economic Research, Osaka University.

Jetter, M., L. M. Magnusson, and S. Roth (2020). Becoming sensitive: Males risk and time preferences after the 2008 financial crisis. European Economic Review 128, 103512.

Leuermann, A. and B. Roth (2012). Does good advice come cheap? - on the assessment of risk preferences in the lab and the field. SOEPpapers on Multidisciplinary Panel Data Research No 475.

Lohmann, P., E. Gsottbauer, J. You, and A. Kontoleon (2020). Social preferences and economic decision-making in the wake of COVID-19: Experimental evidence from China. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3705264.

Luna, R. (2020, March 5). Coronavirus: il paziente tedesco. Available at https://web:archive:org/web/20200816091422/https://rep:repubblica:it/pwa/generale/2020/03/05/news/coronavirus-250377117/ . Last accessed on August 16, 2020.

Mazur, J. E. (1984). Tests of an equivalence rule for fixed and variable reinforcer delays. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes 10 (4), 426-436.

Norwood, B. F., M. C. Roberts, and J. L. Lusk (2004). Ranking crop yield models using out-of sample likelihood functions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 86 (4), 1032-1043.

Page, L., D. A. Savage, and B. Torgler (2014). Variation in risk seeking behaviour following large losses: A natural experiment. European Economic Review 71, 121 - 131.

Patton, J. H., M. S. Stanford, and E. S. Barratt (1995). Factor structure of the barratt impulsiveness scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology 51 (6), 768-774.

Prelec, D. (1998). The probability weighting function. Econometrica 66 (3), 497-528.

Quiggin, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 3 (4), 323-343.

Read, D., S. Frederick, B. Orsel, and J. Rahman (2005). Four score and seven years from now: The date/delay effect in temporal discounting. Management Science 51 (9), 1326-1335.

Schildberg-Horisch, H. (2018, May). Are risk preferences stable? Journal of Economic Perspectives 32 (2), 135-54.

Shachat, J., M. J. Walker, and L. Wei (2020). The impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on economic behaviours and preferences: Experimental evidence from Wuhan. Economic Science Institute Working Paper 20-33 available at: https://digitalcommons.chapman.edu/esi_working_papers/328/ .

Snowberg, E. and L. Yariv (2020). Testing the waters: Behavior across participant pools. American Economic Review (forthcoming).

Spinella, M. (2007). Normative data and a short form of the barratt impulsiveness scale. International Journal of Neuroscience 117 (3), 359-368.

StataCorp (2013). Stata user's guide release 13. College Station, Texas, USA: Stata Press.

Stigler, G. J. and G. S. Becker (1977). De Gustibus Non Est Disputandum. The American Economic Review 67 (2), 76-90.

Tversky, A. and D. Kahneman (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 5 (4), 297-323.

Vischer, T., T. Dohmen, A. Falk, D. Huffman, J. Schupp, U. Sunde, and G. G. Wagner (2013). Validating an ultra-short survey measure of patience. Economics Letters 120 (2), 142-145.

Voors, M. J., E. E. M. Nillesen, P. Verwimp, E. H. Bulte, R. Lensink, and D. P. Van Soest (2012). Violent conflict and behavior: A field experiment in Burundi. American Economic Review 102 (2), 941-64.

Vuong, Q. H. (1989). Likelihood ratio tests for model selection and non-nested hypotheses. Econometrica 57 (2), 307-333.

Weber, E. U., A.-R. Blais, and N. E. Betz (2002). A domain-specific risk-attitude scale: measuring risk perceptions and risk behaviors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 15 (4), 263-290.

Wilcox, N. (2008). Stochastic models for binary discrete choice under risk: A critical primer and econometric comparison. In J. C. Cox and G. W. Harrison (Eds.), Research in Experimental Economics Vol 12: Risk Aversion in Experiments, pp. 197-292. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.

Wilcox, N. T. (2011). `Stochastically more risk averse:' A contextual theory of stochastic discrete choice under risk. Journal of Econometrics 162 (1), 89-104.