Rangi, Pradeep Kumar and Aithal, Sreeramana (2020): A Study on Blockchain Technology as a Dominant Feature to Mitigate Reputational Risk for Indian Academic Institutions and Universities. Published in: International Journal of Applied Engineering and Management Letters (IJAEML) , Vol. 4, No. 2 (31 December 2020): pp. 275-284.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_105347.pdf Download (173kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper-based certification is prone to manipulation and vulnerable to fraud. Instances of fraudulent degrees, manipulation of academic records, or compromised academic programs adversely impact and damage an academic institution's credibility. It also affects the Indian universities’ mission and prospects of the students graduating from such a university. What makes reputational risk a unique risk is that it may arise both from the university or institution's failure or the action outside the university. It is, therefore, essential to take an enterprise risk management approach to mitigate reputational risk. Robust credential verification and validation protocols are the most important protections against fake certifications. The legacy certificate verification solutions are highly centralized, i.e., utterly dependent on the issuing authority for certificates. Despite the University Grants Commission (UGC) taking strict measures against individuals, Indian universities, colleges, and associations, we do come across several acts of torts. Some of the technology-savvy institutions have moved to digital certificates and digital signatures. However, this has an inherent weakness, i.e., they still need to rely on a trusted third party. Blockchain technology has three foundational components, data structures based on cryptography that make it secure and tamperproof, consensus protocols that allow it to function truthfully and without any central authority or a third party smart contracts, which provide efficiency and business value transactions. These key features of blockchain, if implemented appropriately, effectively has the potential to mitigate the inherent reputational risk arising from fraudulent academic certificate matters. Niti Ayog is currently developing a blockchain-based proof of concepts to solve traditional educational qualifications related to identity misrepresentation and document forgery. The immutability attribute of the blockchain ensures that tampering and manipulation of the record are not attainable. This paper focuses on the reputational risk Indian universities and institution may face when its certifications are not easily verifiable. Therefore, it becomes easy targets for bad actors to exploit vulnerabilities by issuing counterfeit certificates. Secondary published data, including various scholarly journals, reports, industry publications, and website sources, are utilized to develop this case study. The paper also explores how blockchain technology with specific reference to the proof of concept SuperCert proposed by Niti Ayog for Indian academic institutions may provide effective preventive control to overcome such reputational risk using the ABCD analysis framework as a research case study.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | A Study on Blockchain Technology as a Dominant Feature to Mitigate Reputational Risk for Indian Academic Institutions and Universities |
English Title: | A Study on Blockchain Technology as a Dominant Feature to Mitigate Reputational Risk for Indian Academic Institutions and Universities |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Reputational risk, Academic Certification, Blockchain, SuperCert, Enterprise Risk Management, Indian Universities |
Subjects: | I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I21 - Analysis of Education I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I2 - Education and Research Institutions > I23 - Higher Education ; Research Institutions M - Business Administration and Business Economics ; Marketing ; Accounting ; Personnel Economics > M1 - Business Administration > M15 - IT Management O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O32 - Management of Technological Innovation and R&D |
Item ID: | 105347 |
Depositing User: | Dr. Sreeramana Aithal |
Date Deposited: | 19 Jan 2021 10:40 |
Last Modified: | 19 Jan 2021 10:40 |
References: | [1] Csiszar, E. and Heidrich, G. W. (2006), The question of reputational risk: Perspectives from an industry, Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance: Issues and Practice, 31(3), 382–394. [2] Huber, M. (2011), The Risk University : Risk identification at higher education institutions in England, Centre for Analysis of Risk and Regulation at the London School of Economic and Political Science, 69(1), 1-25. [3] Roy, A. (2020), Blockchain: The India Strategy, Niti Ayog, 1(1), 37–40. [4] Lin, I. C. and Liao, T. C. (2017), A survey of blockchain security issues and challenges, International Journal of Network Security, 19(5), 653–659. [5] Nakamoto, S. (2008), Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System, Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System - Bitcoin.orgbitcoin.org, 1(1), 1–9. [6] Sleiman, M. D. Lauf, A. P. and Yampolskiy, R. (2016), Bitcoin Message: Data Insertion on a Proof-of-Work Cryptocurrency System, Proceedings - International Conference on Cyberworlds, 1(1), 332–336. [7] Cao, S. Cao, Y. Wang, X. and Lu, Y. (2017), A Review of Researches on Blockchain, 57(1), 108–117. [8] Sharples, M. and Domingue, J. (2016), The blockchain and kudos: A distributed system for educational record, reputation and reward, Springer - Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 9891(1), 490–496 [9] Turkanović, M. Hölbl, M. Košič, K. Heričko, M. and Kamišalić, A. (2018), EduCTX: A blockchain-based higher education credit platform, IEEE Access, 6(1), 5112–5127 [10] ALEX, G. F and CAMILLERI, A. F. (2017), Blockchain in Education, Publications Office of the European Union, 1(1), 1–136. [11] Alammary, A. Alhazmi, S. Almasri, M. and Gillani, S. (2019), Blockchain-based applications in education: A systematic review, Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 9(12), 1–18. [12] Vidal, F. Gouveia, F. and Soares, C. (2019), Analysis of blockchain technology for higher education, Proceedings - International Conference on Cyber-Enabled Distributed Computing and Knowledge Discovery, 1(1), 28–33. [13] Xu, M. Chen, X. and Kou, G. (2019), A systematic review of blockchain, Financial Innovation, 5(27), 1-14. [14] Aithal, P. S. (2015), Study on ABCD Analysis Technique for Business Models, business strategies, Operating Concepts & Business Systems, International Journal in Management and Social Science, 4(1), 98–115. [15] Aithal, P. S., Shailashree, V.T. & Suresh Kumar, P. M. (2015), A New ABCD Technique to Analyse Business Models & Concepts, International Journal of Management, IT and Engineering (IJMIE), 5(4), 409 – 423. [16] Grolleau, G. Lakhal, T. and Mzoughi, N. (2008), An introduction to the economics of fake degrees, Journal of Economic Issues, 42(3), 673–693. [17] Sayed, R. H. (2019), Potential of Blockchain Technology to Solve Fake Diploma Problem, University of Jyvaskyla, Department of computer science and Information systems, 1(1), 1–71. [18] Osipian, A. L. (2008), Corruption in Higher Education: Does it Differ across the Nations and Why?, Research in Comparative and International Education, 3(4), 345–365. [19] Osobi, N. (2017), Uganda university awards over 1000 fake degree to Dinka students in 60 days, South Sudan Liberty. 1(1), 1. [20] Anascavage, R. and Davis, N. (2018), Blockchain Technology: A Literature Review, International Finance Review, 20(1), 131-148. [21] Bhuvana, R. & Aithal, P. S. (2020), Blockchain based Service: A Case Study on IBM Blockchain Services & Hyperledger Fabric, International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT, and Education (IJCSBE), 4(1), 94 -102. [22] Aithal, P. S. (2017), An Effective Method of Developing Business Case Studies Based on Company analysis, International Journal of Engineering Research and Modern Education (IJERME), 2(1), 16–27. [23] Aithal, P. S. (2017), Company Analysis – The Beginning Step for Scholarly Research, International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT and Education (IJCSBE), 1(1), 1–18. [24] Aithal, P. S. (2017), Industry Analysis – The First Step in Business Management Scholarly Research, International Journal of Case Studies in Business, IT and Education (IJCSBE), 1(1), 1-13. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/105347 |