Automation Technology, Economic Growth, and Income Distribution in an Economy with Dynasties and Overlapping Generations

Sasaki, Hiroaki (2021): Automation Technology, Economic Growth, and Income Distribution in an Economy with Dynasties and Overlapping Generations.

Abstract

This study presents a growth model with automation technology that considers two classes (workers and capitalists) who conduct dynamic optimization in different manners. In addition to two production factors, labor and traditional capital, automation capital is included as the third production factor. Long-run dynamics of input ratios of production factors, income distribution, and per capita output growth are investigated. Regardless of the size of workers' discount factor, workers' own traditional capital has no transitional dynamics and stays constant. When capitalists' discount factor is large, in the long run, the growth rate of per capita output is positive and constant: endogenous growth is obtained. In this case, income gap between workers and capitalists continues to increase through time. When capitalists discount factor is small, two different cases appear. First, when the initial value of traditional capital is large, both capitalists' own traditional capital and automation capital converges to constant values. In this case, income gap between workers and capitalists converges to a constant value. Second, when the initial value of traditional capital is small, capitalists' own traditional capital converges to a constant value while capitalists' own automation capital approaches zero. In this case, income gap between workers and capitalists converges to a constant value. When automation capital becomes zero, after then, the dynamical system switches to a dynamical system without automation capital.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: automation technology; endogenous growth; income distribution
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O11 - Macroeconomic Analyses of Economic Development; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O41 - One, Two, and Multisector Growth Models

References

Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2018) ``Artificial Intelligence, Automation, and Work,'' A. Agrawal, J. Gans, and A. Goldfarb (eds.) The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda.

Acemoglu, D. and Restrepo, P. (2020) ``Robots and Jobs: Evidence from US Labor Markets,'' Journal of Political Economy 128 (6), 2188--2244.

Aghion, P., Jones, B. F., and Jones, C. I. (2019) ``Artificial Intelligence and Economic Growth,'' in A. Agrawal, J. Gans, and A. Goldfarb (eds.) The Economics of Artificial Intelligence: An Agenda, University of Chicago Press.

Benzell, S., Kotlikoff, L., LaGardia, G., and Sachs, J. (2015) ``Robots Are Us: Some Economics of Human Replacement,'' NBER Working Paper Series, No. 20941, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Boston Consulting Group (2015) ``The Robotics Revolution: The Next Great Leap in Manufacturing,'' Available at https://www.bcg.com/ja-jp/publications/2015/lean-manufacturing-innovation-robotics-revolution-next-great-leap-manufacturing

Caggetti, M. and De Nardi, M. (2008) ``Wealth Inequality: Data and Models,'' Macroeconomic Dynamics 12, 285--313.

Commendatore, P. and Palmisani, C. (2009) ``The Pasinetti-Solow Growth Model with Optimal Saving Behaviour: A Local Bifurcation Analysis'' in C. H. Skiadas, I. Dimotikalis, and C. Skiadas (eds.) Topics on Chaotic Systems: Selected Papers from CHAOS 2008 International Conference, World Scientific: Singapore

Cords, D. and Prettner, K. (2019) ``Technological Unemployment Revisited: Automation in a Search and Matching Framework,'' GLO Discussion Paper Series, No. 308, Global Labor Organization (GLO).

Frey, C. and and Osborne, M. (2013) ``The Future of Employment: How Susceptible are Jobs to Computerisation?'' Working Paper published by the Oxford Martin Programme on Technology and Employment.

Furuno, Y. (1970) ``Convergence Time in the Samuelson-Modigliani Model'' The Review of Economic Studies 37 (2), 221--232.

Gasteiger, E. and Prettner, K. (2020) ``Automation, Stagnation, and the implications of a Robot Tax,'' Macroeconomic Dynamics. doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1365100520000139.

Graetz, G. and Michaels, G. (2018) ``Robots at Work,'' The Review of Economics and Statistics 100 (5), 753--768.

Heer, B. and Irmen, A. (2019) ``Automation, Economic Growth, and the Labor Share: A Comment on Prettner (2019),'' CESifo Working Paper, No. 7730.

Kurose, K. (2020) ``A Two-class Economy from the Multi-sectoral Perspective: The Controversy between Pasinetti and Meade--Samuelson--Modigliani Revisited,'' Tohoku Economics Research Group Discussion Paper No. 416.

Mankiw, N. G. (2000) ``The Savers-Spenders Theory of Fiscal Policy,'' American Economic Review 90 (2), 120--125.

McKinsey Global Institute (2017) ``Artificial Intelligence: The Next Digital Frontier?'' Discussion Paper, Mckinsey \& Company.

Michl, T. R. and Foley, D. K. (2004) ``Social Security in a Classical Growth Model'' Cambridge Journal of Economics 28, 1--20.

Pasinetti, L. L. (1962) ``Rate of Profit and Income Distribution in Relation to the Rate of Economic Growth'' The Review of Economic Studies 29, 267--279.

Prettner, K. (2019) ``A Note on the Implications of Automation for Economic Growth and the Labor Share,'' Macroeconomic Dynamics 23, 1294--1301.

Sachs, J., Benzell, S., and LaGarda, G. (2015) ``Robots: Curse or Blessing? A Basic Framework,'' NBER Working Paper Series, No. 21091, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Samuelson, P. A. and Modigliani, F. (1966) ``The Pasinetti Paradox in Neoclassical and More General Models,'' The Review of Economic Studies 33, 269--301.

Sasaki, H. (2018) ``Capital Accumulation and the Rate of Profit in a Two-Class Economy with Optimization Behavior,'' MPRA Paper 88362, Munich Personal RePEc Archive.

Zamparelli, L. (2017) ``Wealth Distribution, Elasticity of Substitution and Piketty: An `Anti-Dual' Pasinetti Economy,'' Metroeconomica 68 (4), 927--946.

Zeira, J. (1998) ``Workers, Machines, and Economic Growth,'' The Quarterly Journal of Economics 113 (4), 1091--1117.