Bubak, Baran (2020): تخمین نرخ بهینه عوارض تراکم برای آزادراههای ایران با استفاده از مدل قیمتگذاری ارزش. Published in:
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_105490.pdf Download (5MB) | Preview |
Abstract
English Abstract: This chapter aims at finding the optimal tariff rates for Save-Salafchegan-Tehran-Pardis-Chaloos-Karaj Highways. In so doing, I use Small-Yan index to expand the optimal function around the point of gravity. Using real time data, the model’s parameters have been calibrated. The optimal tariff rates has been extracted. Policy implications are discussed.
Persian Abstract: در این پژوهش هدف بدست آوردن عوارض بهینه برای آزادراههای ساوه-سلفچگان، تهران-پردیس و قزوین-کرج است. برای بدست آوردن عوارض بهینه ابتدا مدل قیمتگذاری ارزش، اسمال و یان برای نزدیکی بیشتر با واقعیت توسط مولف بسط داده شد، پارامترهای این مدل با استفاده از دادههای روزانه تردد شماری سازمان راهداری و حمل و نقل جادهای تخمین زده شد و سپس پارامتر ارزش زمانی به صورت ساختاری تخمین زده شد و عوارض بهینه به صورت عددی برای آزادراههای مزبور بدست آمد. امید که قبول افتد.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | تخمین نرخ بهینه عوارض تراکم برای آزادراههای ایران با استفاده از مدل قیمتگذاری ارزش |
English Title: | Estimation of Optimal Rate for Compact Tariffs in Highways across Iran applying the Value Pricing Methodology |
Language: | Persian |
Keywords: | Value-Pricing, Highway Tarriff, Optimization |
Subjects: | J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J5 - Labor-Management Relations, Trade Unions, and Collective Bargaining > J53 - Labor-Management Relations ; Industrial Jurisprudence K - Law and Economics > K2 - Regulation and Business Law > K23 - Regulated Industries and Administrative Law L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance > L16 - Industrial Organization and Macroeconomics: Industrial Structure and Structural Change ; Industrial Price Indices L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy ; Sectoral Planning Methods |
Item ID: | 105490 |
Depositing User: | Dr Baran Bibak |
Date Deposited: | 27 Jan 2021 21:18 |
Last Modified: | 27 Jan 2021 21:19 |
References: | Al-Agtash, S. Y. (2010). Supply curve bidding of electricity in constrained power networks. Energy, 35(7), 2886–2892. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.019 Al-Agtash, S., & Yamin, H. Y. (2004). Optimal supply curve bidding using Benders decomposition in competitive electricity markets. Electric Power Systems Research, 71(3), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsr.2003.12.020 Bompard, E., Lu, W., Napoli, R., & Jiang, X. (2010). A supply function model for representing the strategic bidding of the producers in constrained electricity markets. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 32(6), 678–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2010.01.001 Borenstein, S., & Bushnell, J. (1999). An empirical analysis of the potential for market power in California’s electricity industry. Journal of Industrial Economics, 47(3), 285–323. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6451.00102 David, A. K., & Wen, F. (2000). Strategic bidding in competitive electricity markets: A literature survey. Proceedings of the IEEE Power Engineering Society Transmission and Distribution Conference, 4, 2168–2173. https://doi.org/10.1109/pess.2000.866982 Ernst, D., Minoia, A., & Marija, I. (2004). Market dynamics driven by the decision-making power producers. https://orbi.uliege.be/handle/2268/13285 Foley, A. M., Ó Gallachóir, B. P., Hur, J., Baldick, R., & McKeogh, E. J. (2010). A strategic review of electricity systems models. Energy, 35(12), 4522–4530. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.03.057 Genc, T. S., & Reynolds, S. S. (2011). Supply function equilibria with capacity constraints and pivotal suppliers. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29(4), 432–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijindorg.2010.08.003 Green, R. J., & Newbery, D. M. (1992). Competition in the British electricity spot market. Journal of Political Economy, 100(5), 929–953. https://doi.org/10.1086/261846 Haghighat, H., Seifi, H., & Rahimi Kian, A. (2008). The role of market pricing mechanism under imperfect competition. Decision Support Systems, 45(2), 267–277. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2007.12.011 Hobbs, B. F., Metzler, C. B., & Pang, J. S. (2000). Strategic gaming analysis for electric power systems: An MPEC approach. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 15(2), 638–645. https://doi.org/10.1109/59.867153 Hortaçsu, A., & Puller, S. L. (2008). Understanding strategic bidding in multi-unit auctions: A case study of the Texas electricity spot market. RAND Journal of Economics, 39(1), 86–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0741-6261.2008.00005.x Li, G., Shi, J., & Qu, X. (2011). Modeling methods for GenCo bidding strategy optimization in the liberalized electricity spot market-A state-of-the-art review. In Energy (Vol. 36, Issue 8, pp. 4686–4700). Elsevier Ltd. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2011.06.015 Noghani, F., & Noghanibehambari, H. (2019). Product Market Competition, Corporate Governance, And Managerial Slack: Evidence from Trade Liberalization. Journal of Leadership, Accountability and Ethics, 16(4). https://doi.org/10.33423/jlae.v16i4.2372 Noghanibehambari, H., & Rahnamamoghadam, M. (2020). Is income inequality reflected in consumption inequality in Iran? Middle East Development Journal, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1080/17938120.2020.1770488 Sioshansi, R., & Oren, S. (2007). How good are supply function equilibrium models: An empirical analysis of the ERCOT balancing market. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 31(1), 1–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11149-006-9008-6 Toranji, M., Noghanibehambari, H., Noghani, F., & Tavassoli, N. (2020). A Game Theoretic Approach in Bidding Strategy in Iran Wholesale Electricity Market. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 22(11). https://doi.org/10.33423/jabe.v22i11.3749 Wang, J. J. D., & Zender, J. F. (2002). Auctioning divisible goods. Economic Theory, 19(4), 673–705. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001990100191 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/105490 |