Persyn, Damiaan (2021): Aggregation bias in wage rigidity estimation.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_106345.pdf Download (621kB) | Preview |
Abstract
I argue in this paper that the estimation of wage rigidity using country level data suffers from aggregation bias. Using European data for the years 2000-2017, I find that wages respond less flexibly to changes in unemployment at the regional level, compared to estimation using the same data aggregated at the country level. A possible explanation is that in the European data changes in aggregate unemployment tend to be driven by regions with low unemployment rates, while unemployment in regions with high unemployment rates is less variable and less responsive to aggregate shocks. The relationship between unemployment and wages -the wage curve- is downward sloping and convex. Due to this nonlinearity, the higher variability in lower regional unemployment rates implies higher observed wage flexibility at the aggregate country level, and biased inference. The implication is that wages are even less responsive to changes in unemployment than is observed in aggregate data and commonly assumed in macro-economic models, such that for example fiscal stimulus would lead to less wage inflation than anticipated.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Aggregation bias in wage rigidity estimation |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | labour market frictions; unemployment; aggregation bias |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C18 - Methodological Issues: General E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials |
Item ID: | 106464 |
Depositing User: | dr. Damiaan Persyn |
Date Deposited: | 11 Mar 2021 08:33 |
Last Modified: | 11 Mar 2021 08:33 |
References: | ALBUQUERQUE, P. H. (2003). A practical log-linear aggregation method with examples: heterogeneous income growth in the USA. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18 (6), 665–678. ANDREWS, I., GENTZKOW, M. and SHAPIRO, J. M. (2017). Measuring the Sensitivity of Parameter Estimates to Estimation Moments*. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132 (4), 1553–1592. ARPAIA, A., KISS, A., PALVOLGYI, B. and TURRINI, A. (2016). Labour mobility and labour market adjustment in the EU. IZA Journal of Migration, 5 (1), 21. BASSO, G., D’AMURI, F. and PERI, G. (2019). Immigrants, Labor Market Dynamics and Adjustment to Shocks in the Euro Area. IMF Economic Review, 67 (3), 528–572. BERAJA, M., HURST, E. and OSPINA, J. (2019). The Aggregate Implications of Regional Business Cycles. Econometrica, 87 (6), 1789–1833. BEYER, R. C. M. and SMETS, F. (2015). Labour market adjustments and migration in Europe and the United States: how different? Economic Policy, 30 (84), 643–682. BLANCHARD, O. and KATZ, L. F. (1997). WhatWe Know and Do Not Know About the Natural Rate of Unemployment. 11 (1), 33. BLANCHFLOWER, D. G. and OSWALD, A. J. (1994). The wage curve. MIT press. CAMPBELL, C. M. (2008). An efficiency wage approach to reconciling the wage curve and the Phillips curve. Labour Economics, 15 (6), 1388–1415. CANOVA, F. (2011). Methods for applied macroeconomic research. Princeton university press. CARD, D. (1994). The wage curve. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. CHETTY, R. (2009). Sufficient Statistics forWelfare Analysis: A Bridge Between Structural and Reduced-Form Methods. Annual Review of Economics, 1 (1), 451–488, _eprint: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.economics.050708.142910. CHUDIK, A. and PESARAN, M. H. (2015). Common correlated effects estimation of heterogeneous dynamic panel data models with weakly exogenous regressors. Journal of Econometrics, 188 (2), 393–420. CLAR, M., DREGER, C. and RAMOS, R. (2007). Wage Flexibility and Labour Market Institutions: A Meta-Analysis. Kyklos, 60 (2), 145–163. DITZEN, J. (2018). Estimating Dynamic Common-Correlated Effects in Stata. The Stata Journal: Promoting communications on statistics and Stata, 18 (3), 585–617. GERTLER, M., HUCKFELDT, C. and TRIGARI, A. (2020). Unemployment Fluctuations, Match Quality, and the Wage Cyclicality of New Hires. The Review of Economic Studies, 87 (4), 1876–1914. HAGEDORN, M. and MANOVSKII, I. (2013). Job Selection andWages over the Business Cycle. American Economic Review, 103 (2), 771–803. HOLDEN, S. and NYMOEN, R. (2002). Measuring Structural Unemployment: NAWRU Estimates in the Nordic Countries. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104 (1), 87–104. JIMENO, J. F. and BENTOLILA, S. (1998). Regional unemployment persistence (Spain, 1976–1994). Labour Economics, 5 (1), 25–51. KOENIG, F., MANNING, A. and PETRONGOLO, B. (2020). Reservation wages and the wage flexibility puzzle. mimeo. KOSFELD, R. and DREGER, C. (2018). Local and spatial cointegration in the wage curve – a spatial panel analysis for german regions. Review of Regional Research, 38 (1), 53–75. LEWBEL, A. (1992). Aggregation with Log-Linear Models. The Review of Economic Studies, 59 (3), 635. LIPSEY, R. G. (1960). The Relation between Unemployment and the Rate of Change of Money Wage Rates in the United Kingdom, 1862-1957: A Further Analysis. Economica, 27 (105). NAKAMURA, E. and STEINSSON, J. (2018). Identification in Macroeconomics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32 (3), 59–86. NYMOEN, R. and RØDSETH, A. (2003). Explaining unemployment: Some lessons from Nordic wage formation. Labour Economics, 10 (1), 1–29. PESARAN, M. and SMITH, R. (1995). Estimating long-run relationships from dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 68 (1), 79–113. PESARAN, M. H. (2006). Estimation and inference in large heterogeneous panels with a multifactor error structure. Econometrica, 74 (4), 967–1012. PESARAN, M. H., SHIN, Y. and SMITH, R. P. (1999). Pooled Mean Group Estimation of Dynamic Heterogeneous Panels. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94 (446), 621–634. ROBERTS, J. M. (1997). The wage curve and the Phillips curve. In Finance and Economics Discussion Paper Series # 57, Federal Reserve Board of Governors. SILVA, J. S. and TENREYRO, S. (2006). The log of gravity. The Review of Economics and statistics, 88 (4), 641–658. STOKER, T. M. (1986). Simple Tests of Distributional Effects on Macroeconomic Equations. Journal of Political Economy, 94 (4), 763–795. THEIL, H. (1954). Linear Aggregation of Economic Relations. North-Holland. VAN GARDEREN, K. J., LEE, K. and PESARAN, M. (2000). Cross-sectional aggregation of non-linear models. Journal of Econometrics, 95 (2), 285–331. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/106464 |