A Generalized Endogenous Grid Method for Default Risk Models

Jang, Youngsoo and Lee, Soyoung (2020): A Generalized Endogenous Grid Method for Default Risk Models.

Abstract

Default risk models have been widely employed to assess the ability of households and sovereigns to insure themselves against shocks. Grid search has often been used to solve these models because the complexity of the problem prevents the use of faster but less general methods. In this paper, we propose an extension of the endogenous grid method for default risk models, which is faster and more accurate than grid search. In particular, we find that our solution method leads to a more accurate bond price function, thus making substantial differences in the model’s main predictions. When applied to Arellano’s (2008) model, our approach predicts a standard deviation of the interest rate spread one-third lower and defaults 3 to 5 times less frequently than does the conventional approach. On top of that, our method is efficient. It is approximately 4 to 7 times faster than grid search when applied to a canonical model of Arellano (2008) and 19 to 27 times faster than grid search when applied to the richer model of Nakajima and R´ıos-Rull (2014). Finally, we show that our method is applicable to a broad class of default risk models by characterizing sufficient conditions.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Endogenous grid method, Default, Bankruptcy
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling

References

Aguiar, Mark and Gita Gopinath, “Defaultable debt, interest rates and the current account,” Journal of international Economics, 2006, 69 (1), 64–83.

Algan, Yann, Olivier Allais, Wouter J Den Haan, and Pontus Rendahl, “Solving and simulat- ing models with heterogeneous agents and aggregate uncertainty,” in “Handbook of Computa- tional Economics,” Vol. 3, Elsevier, 2014, pp. 277–324.

Arellano, Cristina, “Default risk and income fluctuations in emerging economies,” American Eco- nomic Review, 2008, 98 (3), 690–712.

, Lilia Maliar, Serguei Maliar, and Viktor Tsyrennikov, “Envelope condition method with an application to default risk models,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2016, 69, 436–459.

Athreya, Kartik B, “Default, insurance, and debt over the life-cycle,” Journal of Monetary Eco- nomics, 2008, 55 (4), 752–774.

Athreya, Kartik, Xuan S Tam, and Eric R Young, “Unsecured credit markets are not insurance markets,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 2009, 56 (1), 83–103.

, , and , “A quantitative theory of information and unsecured credit,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2012, 4 (3), 153–83.

Barillas, Francisco and Jesu´s Ferna´ndez-Villaverde, “A generalization of the endogenous grid method,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2007, 31 (8), 2698–2712.

Carroll, Christopher D, “The method of endogenous gridpoints for solving dynamic stochastic optimization problems,” Economics letters, 2006, 91 (3), 312–320.

Chatterjee, Satyajit and Grey Gordon, “Dealing with consumer default: Bankruptcy vs garnish- ment,” Journal of Monetary Economics, 2012, 59, S1–S16.

, Dean Corbae, Makoto Nakajima, and Jose´-V´ıctor R´ıos-Rull, “A quantitative theory of unsecured consumer credit with risk of default,” Econometrica, 2007, 75 (6), 1525–1589.

Clausen, Andrew and Carlo Strub, “Reverse calculus and nested optimization,” Journal of Eco- nomic Theory, 2020, p. 105019.

Druedahl, Jeppe and Thomas Høgholm Jørgensen, “A general endogenous grid method for multi-dimensional models with non-convexities and constraints,” Journal of Economic Dynam- ics and Control, 2017, 74, 87–107.

Fella, Giulio, “A generalized endogenous grid method for non-smooth and non-concave prob- lems,” Review of Economic Dynamics, 2014, 17 (2), 329–344.

Glover, Andrew et al., “Bankruptcy, Incorporation, and the Nature of Entrepreneurial Risk,” in “2010 Meeting Papers” number 1010 Society for Economic Dynamics 2010.

Gordon, Grey, “Evaluating default policy: The business cycle matters,” Quantitative Economics, 2015, 6 (3), 795–823.

Hatchondo, Juan Carlos, Leonardo Martinez, and Horacio Sapriza, “Quantitative properties of sovereign default models: solution methods matter,” Review of Economic dynamics, 2010, 13 (4), 919–933.

Hintermaier, Thomas and Winfried Koeniger, “The method of endogenous gridpoints with oc- casionally binding constraints among endogenous variables,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2010, 34 (10), 2074–2088.

Iskhakov, Fedor, Thomas H Jørgensen, John Rust, and Bertel Schjerning, “The endogenous grid method for discrete-continuous dynamic choice models with (or without) taste shocks,” Quantitative Economics, 2017, 8 (2), 317–365.

Jang, Youngsoo, “Credit, Default, and Optimal Health Insurance,” Available at SSRN 3429441, 2020.

Krusell, Per and Anthony A Smith Jr, “Income and wealth heterogeneity in the macroeconomy,” Journal of Political Economy, 1998, 106 (5), 867–896.

Livshits, Igor, James MacGee, and Michele Tertilt, “Consumer bankruptcy: A fresh start,” American Economic Review, 2007, 97 (1), 402–418.

, , and , “Accounting for the rise in consumer bankruptcies,” American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2010, 2 (2), 165–93.

Nakajima, Makoto, “Assessing bankruptcy reform in a model with temptation and equilibrium default,” Journal of Public Economics, 2017, 145, 42–64.

and Jose´-V´ıctor R´ıos-Rull, “Credit, bankruptcy, and aggregate fluctuations,” Technical Report, National Bureau of Economic Research 2014.

Tauchen, George, “Finite state markov-chain approximations to univariate and vector autoregres- sions,” Economics letters, 1986, 20 (2), 177–181.

Villemot, Se´bastien, “Accelerating the resolution of sovereign debt models using an endogenous grid method,” 2012.

White, Matthew N, “The method of endogenous gridpoints in theory and practice,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 2015, 60, 26–41.

Yue, Vivian Z, “Sovereign default and debt renegotiation,” Journal of International Economics, 2010, 80 (2), 176–187.