Christmann, Robin (2021): Plea Bargaining and Investigation Effort: Inquisitorial Criminal Procedure as a Three-Player Game.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_108976.pdf Download (885kB) | Preview |
Abstract
We study the impact of plea bargaining on decision errors and operating costs of the inquisitorial justice system. Scholars and legal professionals are divided over whether such plea deals are compatible with the inquisitorial tradition. In this paper, we stylize inquisitorial criminal procedure as a sequential game with two benevolent investigators, judge and prosecutor. Both agents are subject to private investigation costs and seek a correct decision over a defendant of uncertain guilt. Our analysis shows that the introduction of plea deals in courtroom helps to overcome the problem of effort coordination between the two investigating agents. All equilibria that involve a conviction also adhere to the ‘beyond reasonable doubt’-conviction threshold. Moreover, we demonstrate that plea bargaining reduces the frequency of wrongful convictions (type I errors) in inquisitorial procedures.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Plea Bargaining and Investigation Effort: Inquisitorial Criminal Procedure as a Three-Player Game |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | screening, free-riding, litigation, court errors |
Subjects: | D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D82 - Asymmetric and Private Information ; Mechanism Design K - Law and Economics > K1 - Basic Areas of Law > K14 - Criminal Law K - Law and Economics > K4 - Legal Procedure, the Legal System, and Illegal Behavior > K41 - Litigation Process |
Item ID: | 108976 |
Depositing User: | Prof. Dr. Robin Christmann |
Date Deposited: | 03 Aug 2021 00:43 |
Last Modified: | 03 Aug 2021 00:43 |
References: | Adelstein, Richard, and Thomas Miceli. 2001. Toward a comparative economics of plea bargaining. European Journal of Law and Economics 11: 47-67. Altenhain, Karsten, Matthias Jahn, and Jörg Kinzig. 2020. Die Praxis der Verständigung im Strafprozess. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Baker, Scott, and Claudio Mezzetti. 2001. Prosecutorial Resources, Plea Bargaining, and the Decision to Go to Trial. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 17: 149-167. Bibas, Stephanos. 2004. Plea Bargaining Outside the Shadow of Trial. Harvard Law Review 117: 2463-2547. Burke, Alafair. 2007. Prosecutorial Passion, Cognitive Bias, and Plea Bargaining. Marquette Law Review 91: 183-211. Christmann, Robin. 2021. Prosecution and Conviction under Hindsight Biased Information Updating in Adversary Legal Systems. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics (forthcoming). Christmann, Robin, and Roland Kirstein. 2020. You go First! – Coordination Problems and the Standard of Proof in Inquisitorial Prosecution. Research Paper No. 8, Leibniz FH. Emons, Winand, and Claude Fluet. 2009. Accuracy Versus Falsification Costs: The Optimal Amount of Evidence under Different Procedures. Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization 25: 134-156. Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung (‘FAZ’). 2009. BGH-Präsident Tolksdorf kritisiert “Deals”. URL https://www.faz.net/aktuell/politik/staat-und-recht/bgh-praesident-kritisiert-deals-in-strafprozessen-1757231.html. Downloaded 15.06.2021. Froeb, Luke, and Bruce Kobayashi. 2001. Evidence production in adversarial vs. inquisitorial regimes. Economics Letters 70: 267-272. Frommann, Maike. 2009. Regulating plea-bargaining in Germany: can the italian approach serve as a model to guarantee the independence of german judges. Hanse Law Review 5: 197-220. Fudenberg, Drew, and Jean Tirole. 1999. Game Theory. Cambridge: MIT Press. Garoupa, Nuno, and Frank Stephen. 2008. Why Plea-Bargaining Fails to Achieve Results in So Many Criminal Justice Systems: A New Framework for Assessment. Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 15: 323-358. Garoupa, Nuno. 2012. The Economics of Prosecutors. In: A. Harel & K. Hylton (eds.), Research Handbook on the Economics of Criminal Law. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing. Grossmann, Gene, and Michael Katz. 1983. Plea Bargaining and Social Welfare. American Economic Review 73: 749-757. Hodgson, Jacqueline. 2015. Plea Bargaining: A Comparative Analysis. In: James D. Wright (ed.) International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences vol. 18, 226-231. Oxford: Elsevier. Jahn, Matthias, and Hans Kudlich. 2016. In: Harmut Schneider (ed.) Münchener Kommentar zur Strafprozessordnung Band 2. §257c, Rn. 57-58. Kim, Chulyoung. 2013. Adversarial and Inquisitorial Procedures with Information Acquisition. Journal of Law, Economics & Organization 30: 767-803. Kobayashi, Bruce, and John Lott. 1996. In Defense of Criminal Defense Expenditures and Plea Bargaining. International Review of Law and Economics 16: 397-415. Kreps, David, and Robert Wilson. 1982. Sequential Equilibria. Econometrica 50: 863-894. Kölbel, Ralf. 2020. Schwerpunkte der internationalen Kriminalitätsentwicklung. In: E. Hoven and M. Kubiciel (eds.) Zukunftsperspektiven des Strafrechts. Baden-Baden: Nomos. Landau, Herbert. 2011. Strafrecht nach Lissabon. Neue Zeitschrift für Strafrecht 31: 537-546. Langbein, John. 1979. Land without Plea Bargaining: How the Germans Do It. Michigan Law Review 78: 204-225. Lewisch, Peter. 2000. Criminal Procedure. In: A. Marciano & G. Ramello (Eds.) Encyclopedia of Law and Economics. New York: Springer. Parlato, Lucia. 2012. Ein Blick auf den italienischen Strafprozess: Vorbild oder abschreckendes Beispiel? Die aktuelle Situation und Gedanken zur Reform. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 10/2012: 513-520. Miceli, Thomas. 1996. Plea Bargaining and Deterrence: An Institutional Approach. European Journal of Law and Economics 3: 249-264. Reinganum, Jennifer. 1988. Plea Bargaining and Prosecutorial Discretion. American Economic Review 78: 713-728. Rönnau, Thomas. 2018. Das deutsche Absprachemodell auf dem Prüfstand – Zwischen Pest und Cholera. Zeitschrift für Internationale Strafrechtsdogmatik 5: 167-177. Shavell, Steven. 1982. Suit, settlement, and trial: A theoretical analysis under alternative methods for the allocation of legal costs. Journal of Legal Studies 11: 55-81. Soubise, Laurène. 2018. Guilty pleas in an inquisitorial setting–An empirical study of France. Journal of Law and Society 45: 398-426. Spier, Kathryn. 2007. Litigation. In: Polinsky M., Shavell S. (eds.) Handbook of Law and Economics. Heidelberg: North Holland. Tirole, Jean, and Mathias Dewatripont. 1999. Advocates. Journal of Political Economy 107: 1-39. Tsur, Yacov. 2017. Bounding reasonable doubt: implications for plea bargaining. European Journal of Law and Economics 44: 197-216. UK Ministry of Justice. 2019. Criminal Court Statistics Quarterly, England and Wales, January to March 2019. London. US Department of Justice. 2021. Federal Justice Statistics 2017-2018. Washington, D.C. Wohlers, Wolfgang. 2010. Das Strafverfahren in den Zeiten der" Eilkrankheit. Neue Juristische Wochenschrift 63: 2470-2475. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/108976 |