Environmental Productivity and Convergence of European Manufacturing Industries. Are they Under Pressure?

Stergiou, Eirini and Rigas, Nikos and Kounetas, Konstantinos (2021): Environmental Productivity and Convergence of European Manufacturing Industries. Are they Under Pressure?

Abstract

European industries are under pressure regarding their environmental performance and productivity growth. The current energy crisis offsets governments efforts to achieve carbon neutrality while removing significant degrees of freedom in terms of firm's competitiveness. This paper studies environmental productivity and its components at a European industrial level using a dataset of 13 industries of the manufacturing sector from 27 European countries over the 1995-2014 period. Our results point out that industrial environmental productivity has deteriorated across Europe with best practice change being the main contributor. In addition, referring to the technological leaders in Europe, the findings point out that low tend to follow the middle-high technology industries. Finally, the non-convergence hypothesis and the creation of discrete clubs for the productivity index case and its components are supported.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: European Industries; Metafrontier Malmquist Luenberger index; Convergence; Technological heterogeneity
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis; D - Microeconomics > D2 - Production and Organizations > D24 - Production ; Cost ; Capital ; Capital, Total Factor, and Multifactor Productivity ; Capacity; L - Industrial Organization > L6 - Industry Studies: Manufacturing > L60 - General; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q43 - Energy and the Macroeconomy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q56 - Environment and Development ; Environment and Trade ; Sustainability ; Environmental Accounts and Accounting ; Environmental Equity ; Population Growth

References

Aichele, R., & Felbermayr, G. (2015). Kyoto and carbon leakage:An empirical analysis of the carbon content of bilateral trade. Review of Economics and Statistics, 97(1), 104-115.

Battese, G. E., & Rao, D. P. (2002). Technology gap, efficiency, and a stochastic metafrontier function. International Journal of Business and Economics, 1(2), 87.

Beltran-Esteve, M., Gimenez, V., & Picazo-Tadeo, A. J. (2019).Environmental productivity in the European Union: A global Luenberger-metafrontier approach. Science of The Total Environment, 692, 136-146.

Brannlund, R., Lundgren, T., & Soderholm, P. (2015). Convergence of carbon dioxide performance across Swedish industrial sectors: an environmental index approach. Energy Economics, 51, 227-235.

Camarero, M., Castillo-Gimenez, J., Picazo-Tadeo, A. J., & Tamarit, C. (2014). Is eco-effciency in greenhouse gas emissions converging among European Union countries?. Empirical Economics, 47(1), 143-168.

Chatzistamoulou, N., Kounetas, K., & Tsekouras, K. (2019). Energy efficiency, productive performance and heterogeneous competitiveness regimes. Does the dichotomy matter?. Energy Economics, 81, 687-697.

Chen, S. Y. (2010). Green industrial revolution in China: a perspective from the change of environmental total factor productivity. Economic Research Journal, 45(10), 21-34.

Chen, K. H., & Yang, H. Y. (2011). A cross-country comparison of productivity growth using the generalised metafrontier Malmquist productivity index: with application to banking industries in Taiwan and China. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 35(3), 197-212.

Chen, S., & Golley, J. (2014). 'Green'productivity growth in China's industrial economy. Energy Economics, 44, 89-98.

Chiu, C.E., Liou, J.L., Wu, P.I., & Fang, C.L., (2012). Decomposition of the environmental inefficiency of the Metafrontier with undesirable output. Energy Economics, 34, 1391-1399.

Chung, Y. H., Fare, R., & Grosskopf, S. (1997). Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance function approach. Journal of Environmental Management, 51(3), 229-240.

Chung, Y., & Heshmati, A. (2015). Measurement of environmentally sensitive productivity growth in Korean industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 104, 380-391.

Choi, Y., Oh, D. H., & Zhang, N. (2015). Environmentally sensitive productivity growth and its decompositions in China: a metafrontier Malmquist{Luenberger productivity index approach. Empirical Economics, 49(3), 1017-1043.

Costantini, V., Crespi, F., Marin, G., & Paglialunga, E. (2017). Eco-innovation, sustainable supply chains and environmental performance in European industries. Journal of Cleaner Production, 155, 141-154.

European Commission, (2013). Commission of the European Union DECISION No 377/2013/EU OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 24 April 2013 derogating temporarily from Directive 2003/87/EC establishing a scheme for greenhouse gas emission allowance trading within the Community (accessed on 22 July 2021)

European Commission, (2018). A Clean Planet for all: A European strategic long-term vision for a prosperous, modern, competitive and climate neutral economy. (accessed on 22 July 2021)

European Commission, (2019). The European Green Deal. (accessed on 22 July 2021) European Commission, (2020). A New Industrial Strategy for Europe. (accessed on 22 July 2021)

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka, Jr, C. A. (2001). Accounting for air pollution emissions in measures of state manufacturing productivity growth. Journal of Regional Science, 41(3), 381-409.

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Pasurka Jr, C. A. (2007). Environmental production functions and environmental directional distance functions. Energy, 32(7), 1055-1066.

Fare, R., Grosskopf, S., & Margaritis, D. (2008). Efficiency and productivity: Malmquist and more. The measurement of productive efficiency and productivity growth, 5, 522-622.

Haider, S., & Akram, V. (2019). Club convergence analysis of ecological and carbon footprint: evidence from a cross-country analysis.Carbon Management, 10(5), 451-463.

Hascic, I., Johnstone, N., Watson, F., & Kaminker, C. (2010). Climate Policy and Technological Innovation and Transfer: An Overview of Trends and Recent Empirical Results, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 30, OECD Publishing, Paris.

He, F., Zhang, Q., Lei, J., Fu, W., & Xu, X. (2013). Energy efficiency and productivity change of China's iron and steel industry: Accounting for undesirable outputs. Energy Policy, 54, 204-213.

IPCC, (2021). Summary for Policymakers. In: Climate Change 2021: The Physical Science Basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press. In Press.

Isaksson, O. H., Simeth, M., & Seifert, R. W. (2016). Knowledge spillovers in the supply chain: Evidence from the high tech sectors. Research Policy, 45(3), 699-706.

Kounetas, K., Mourtos, I., & Tsekouras, K. (2012). Is energy intensity important for the productivity growth of EET adopters?. Energy economics, 34(4), 930-941.

Kumar, S. (2006). Environmentally sensitive productivity growth: a global analysis using Malmquist Luenberger index. Ecological Economics, 56(2), 280-293.

Lee, H. (2021). Is carbon neutrality feasible for Korean manufacturing firms?: The CO2 emissions performance of the Metafrontier Malmquist Luenberger index. Journal of Environmental Management, 297, 113235.

Li, K., & Lin, B. (2016). Impact of energy conservation policies on the green productivity in China's manufacturing sector: Evidence from a three-stage DEA model. Applied energy, 168, 351-363.

Lin, E. Y. Y., Chen, P. Y., & Chen, C. C. (2013). Measuring green productivity of country: A generlized metafrontier Malmquist productivity index approach. Energy, 55, 340-353.

Los, B., & Verspagen, B. (2002). An introduction to the analysis of systems of innovation: scientific and technological interdependencies. Economic Systems Research, 14(4), 315-322.

Mahlberg, B., & Sahoo, B. K. (2011). Radial and non-radial decompositions of Luenberger productivity indicator with an illustrative application. International Journal of Production Economics, 131(2),721-726.

Malmquist, S. (1953). Index numbers and indiference surfaces. Trabajos de estadistica, 4(2), 209-242.

Manning, S., Boons, F., Von Hagen, O., & Reinecke, J. (2012). National contexts matter: The co-evolution of sustainability standards in global value chains. Ecological Economics, 83, 197-209.

Maskus, K. (2010), Diferentiated Intellectual Property Regimes for Environmental and Climate Technologies, OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 17, OECD Publishing, Paris.

Nikzad, R., & Sedigh, G. (2017). Greenhouse gas emissions and green technologies in Canada. Environmental Development, 24, 99-108.

Oh, D. H. (2010). A metafrontier approach for measuring an environmentally sensitive productivity growth index. Energy Economics, 32(1), 146-157.

Pasurka Jr, C. A. (2006). Decomposing electric power plant emissions within a joint production framework. Energy Economics,28(1), 26-43.

Phillips, P. C., & Sul, D. (2007). Transition modeling and econometric convergence tests. Econometrica, 75(6), 1771- 855.

Saliola, F., & Zanfei, A. (2009). Multinational firms, global value chains and the organization of knowledge transfer. Research policy, 38(2), 369-381.

Skaejrseth, J. B. (2021). Towards a European Green Deal: The evolution of EU climate and energy policy mixes. International Environmental Agreements: Politics, Law and Economics, 21(1), 25-41.

Stergiou, E., & Kounetas, K. (2021a). European Industries' Energy Efficiency under Different Technological Regimes: The Role of CO2 Emissions, Climate, Path Dependence and Energy Mix. The Energy Journal, 42(1).

Stergiou, E., & Kounetas, K. E. (2021b). Eco-efficiency convergence and technology spillovers of European industries. Journal of Environmental Management, 283, 111972.

Tsekouras, K., Chatzistamoulou, N., & Kounetas, K. (2017). Productive performance, technology heterogeneity and hierarchies: Who to compare with whom. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 465-478.

Tulkens, H., & Eeckaut, P. V. (1995). Non-parametric efficiency, progress and regress measures for panel data: methodological aspects. European Journal of Operational Research, 80(3), 474-499.

Weber, W. L., & Domazlicky, B. (2001). Productivity growth and pollution in state manufacturing. Review of Economics and Statistics, 83(1), 195-199.

Wielgosinski, G. (2012). Pollutant formation in combustion processes. Advances in chemical engineering, 295-324.

Zhang, C., Liu, H., Bressers, H. T. A., & Buchanan, K. S. (2011). Productivity growth and environmental regulations-accounting for undesirable outputs: Analysis of China's thirty provincial regions using the Malmquist Luenberger index. Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2369-2379.

Zhou, P., Ang, B. W., & Wang, H. (2012). Energy and CO2 emission performance in electricity generation: a non-radial directional distance function approach. European journal of operational research, 221(3), 625-635.