Unintended consequences of corruption indices: an experimental approach

Chapkovski, Philipp (2022): Unintended consequences of corruption indices: an experimental approach.

Abstract

Using the results of a large-scale (N=900) online experiment, this paper investigates how the information about a group corruption level may harm intergroup relations. Corruption indices are widely used as a measure of quality of governance. But in addition to be a valuable tool for investors and policy makers for making informed decisions, they may also result in statistical discrimination: people from a more ‘corrupt’ region may be perceived as less trustworthy or more inclined to dishonest behavior.

We manipulated the amount of information people have about three different Russian regions in two simple behavioral games (‘Cheating game’ and Trust game). In a Cheating game after the main stage where they report whether they observed a head or a tail on a flipped coin, they guessed how many participants in each of the three regions reported more personally profitable outcome (heads) as well as make trasfer decisions in a standard trust game. In the baseline treatment we provided them with a set of generic information about each region (such as population size), while in the main treatment they were additionally informed about the degree of perceived corruption in each region. The presence of corruption information made people substantially overestimate the degree of dishonesty in more ‘corrupt’ regions and decreased the trust towards a person from this region. The results demonstrate the potentially harmful unintended consequences of corruption indices that have to be taken into account by policy makers.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Corruption; experiments; online research; survey research
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C90 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D7 - Analysis of Collective Decision-Making > D73 - Bureaucracy ; Administrative Processes in Public Organizations ; Corruption; Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z13 - Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology ; Social and Economic Stratification

References

Abeler, Johannes, Daniele Nosenzo, and Collin Raymond. 2019. “Preferences for Truth-Telling.” Econometrica 87 (4): 1115–53.

Akın, Zafer. 2019. “Dishonesty, Social Information, and Sorting.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 80: 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2019.03.009.

Andersson, Staffan, and Paul M. Heywood. 2009. “The Politics of Perception: Use and Abuse of Transparency International’s Approach to Measuring Corruption.” Political Studies 57 (4): 746–67.

Andrighetto, Giulia, Nan Zhang, Stefania Ottone, Ferruccio Ponzano, John D’Attoma, and Sven Steinmo. 2016. “Are Some Countries More Honest than Others? Evidence from a Tax Compliance Experiment in Sweden and Italy.” Frontiers in Psychology 7. https://www.frontiersin.org/article/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00472.

Banerjee, Ritwik. 2016. “Corruption, Norm Violation and Decay in Social Capital.” Journal of Public Economics 137: 14–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2016.03.007.

Barr, Abigail, and Danila Serra. 2010. “Corruption and Culture: An Experimental Analysis.” Journal of Public Economics 94 (11): 862–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2010.07.006.

Berg, Joyce, John Dickhaut, and Kevin McCabe. 1995. “Trust, Reciprocity, and Social History.” Games and Economic Behavior 10 (1): 122–42.

Bicchieri, Cristina. 2005. The Grammar of Society: The Nature and Dynamics of Social Norms. Cambridge University Press.

Bracht, Juergen, and Nick Feltovich. 2009. “Whatever You Say, Your Reputation Precedes You: Observation and Cheap Talk in the Trust Game.” Journal of Public Economics 93 (9): 1036–44. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpubeco.2009.06.004.

Brandts, J., and G. Charness. 2011. “The Strategy versus the Direct-Response Method: A First Survey of Experimental Comparisons.” Experimental Economics 14 (3): 375–98.

Bucciol, Alessandro, and Marco Piovesan. 2011. “Luck or Cheating? A Field Experiment on Honesty with Children.” Journal of Economic Psychology 32 (1): 73–78.

Butrin, Dmitrii. 2019. “Konturnaja karta korrupcii.” June 3, 2019. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/3990138.

Charness, Gary, Uri Gneezy, and Brianna Halladay. 2016. “Experimental Methods: Pay One or Pay All.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 131: 141–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2016.08.010.

Charron, Nicholas, Lewis Dijkstra, and Victor Lapuente. 2015. “Mapping the Regional Divide in Europe: A Measure for Assessing Quality of Government in 206 European Regions.” Social Indicators Research 122 (2): 315–46. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-014-0702-y.

Cheeseman, Nic, and Caryn Peiffer. 2020. “The Unintended Consequences of Anti-Corruption Messaging in Nigeria: Why Pessimists Are Always Disappointed.” ACE Working Paper 24.

Corbacho, Ana, Daniel W. Gingerich, Virginia Oliveros, and Mauricio Ruiz-Vega. 2016. “Corruption as a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy: Evidence from a Survey Experiment in Costa Rica.” American Journal of Political Science. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ajps.12244/pdf.

Dai, Zhixin, Fabio Galeotti, and Marie Claire Villeval. 2018. “Cheating in the Lab Predicts Fraud in the Field: An Experiment in Public Transportation.” Management Science 64 (3): 1081–1100. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2016.2616.

Dickinson, David L, and David M McEvoy. 2021a. “Further from the Truth: The Impact of Moving from in-Person to Online Settings on Dishonest Behavior.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 90: 101649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101649.

———. 2021b. “Further from the Truth: The Impact of Moving from in-Person to Online Settings on Dishonest Behavior.” Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics 90: 101649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socec.2020.101649.

Diekmann, Andreas, Wojtek Przepiorka, and Heiko Rauhut. 2015. “Lifting the Veil of Ignorance: An Experiment on the Contagiousness of Norm Violations.” Rationality and Society 27 (3): 309–33. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463115593109.

Donchev, Dilyan, and Gergely Ujhelyi. 2014. “What Do Corruption Indices Measure?” Economics & Politics 26 (2): 309–31.

Dong, Bin, Uwe Dulleck, and Benno Torgler. 2012. “Conditional Corruption.” Journal of Economic Psychology 33 (3): 609–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2011.12.001.

Falisse, Jean-Benoît, and Nastassia Leszczynska. 2022. “Do Anti-Corruption Messages Improve Public Service Delivery? Insights from a Lab-in-the-Field Experiment in Burundi.” The Journal of Development Studies 58 (1): 96–114. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220388.2021.1969010.

Fang, Hanming, and Andrea Moro. 2011. “Theories of Statistical Discrimination and Affirmative Action: A Survey.” Handbook of Social Economics 1: 133–200.

FOM. 2011. “The State of Domestic Corruption in the Russian Federation.” Moscow: Ministry of Economic Development. https://old.economy.gov.ru/minec/resources/116f09004739f0c7a2a4eeb4415291f1/doklad_kor.pdf.

Heinicke, Franziska, Stephanie Rosenkranz, and Utz Weitzel. 2019. “The Effect of Pledges on the Distribution of Lying Behavior: An Online Experiment.” Journal of Economic Psychology 73: 136–51. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2019.05.006.

Hübler, Olaf, Melanie Koch, Lukas Menkhoff, and Ulrich Schmidt. 2019. “Cheating and Corruption: Evidence from a Household Survey.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3476538. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3476538.

Jiang, Ting. 2014a. “Other-Regarding Preferences and Other-Regarding Cheating – Experimental Evidence from China, Italy, Japan and the Netherlands.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2558814. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2558814.

———. 2014b. “Other-Regarding Preferences and Other-Regarding Cheating – Experimental Evidence from China, Italy, Japan and the Netherlands.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2558814. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2558814.

Johnson, Noel D., and Alexandra A. Mislin. 2011. “Trust Games: A Meta-Analysis.” Journal of Economic Psychology 32 (5): 865–89.

Krupka, Erin L., and Roberto A. Weber. 2013. “Identifying Social Norms Using Coordination Games: Why Does Dictator Game Sharing Vary?” Journal of the European Economic Association 11 (3): 495–524.

Le Maux, Benoit, David Masclet, and Sarah Necker. 2021. “Monetary Incentives and the Contagion of Unethical Behavior.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 3805628. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3805628.

Lucifora, Claudio, and Marco Tonello. 2012. “Students’ Cheating as a Social Interaction: Evidence from a Randomized Experiment in a National Evaluation Program.” SSRN Scholarly Paper ID 2170655. Rochester, NY: Social Science Research Network. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2170655.

Maggian, Valeria. 2019. “Chapter 3.3 - Negative Externalities of Cheating: An Experiment with Charities.” In Dishonesty in Behavioral Economics, edited by Alessandro Bucciol and Natalia Montinari, 183–91. Perspectives in Behavioral Economics and the Economics of Behavior. Academic Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-815857-9.00012-1.

Mann, Heather, Ximena Garcia-Rada, Lars Hornuf, Juan Tafurt, and Dan Ariely. 2016. “Cut From the Same Cloth: Similarly Dishonest Individuals Across Countries.” Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology 47 (6): 858–74. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022116648211.

McCarney, Rob, James Warner, Steve Iliffe, Robbert Van Haselen, Mark Griffin, and Peter Fisher. 2007. “The Hawthorne Effect: A Randomised, Controlled Trial.” BMC Medical Research Methodology 7 (1): 1–8.

Mitra, Arnab, and Quazi Shahriar. 2020. “Why Is Dishonesty Difficult to Mitigate? The Interaction between Descriptive Norm and Monetary Incentive.” Journal of Economic Psychology 80: 102292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2020.102292.

Mouminoux, Claire, and Jean-Louis Rullière. 2021. “Are We More Honest than Others Think We Are?” https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-01999536.

Necker, Sarah, Benoit Le Maux, and David Masclet. 2020. “Are People Conditionally Honest? The Effects of Stakes and Information about Others’ Behavior.” In . Kiel, Hamburg: ZBW - Leibniz Information Centre for Economics. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/224578.

Olsen, Asmus Leth, Frederik Hjorth, Nikolaj Harmon, and Sebastian Barfort. 2019. “Behavioral Dishonesty in the Public Sector.” Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 29 (4): 572–90.

Pascual-Ezama, David, Toke R. Fosgaard, Juan Camilo Cardenas, Praveen Kujal, Robert Veszteg, Beatriz Gil-Gómez de Liaño, Brian Gunia, et al. 2015. “Context-Dependent Cheating: Experimental Evidence from 16 Countries.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 116: 379–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2015.04.020.

Peiffer, Caryn, and Linda Alvarez. 2016. “Who Will Be the ‘Principled-Principals’? Perceptions of Corruption and Willingness to Engage in Anticorruption Activism.” Governance 29 (3): 351–69. https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12172.

Rauhut, Heiko. 2013. “Beliefs about Lying and Spreading of Dishonesty: Undetected Lies and Their Constructive and Destructive Social Dynamics in Dice Experiments.” PLOS ONE 8 (11): e77878. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0077878.

Rohwer, Anja. 2009. “Measuring Corruption: A Comparison between the Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index and the World Bank’s Worldwide Governance Indicators.” CESifo DICE Report 7 (3): 42–52.

Rothstein, Bo, and Daniel Eek. 2009. “Political Corruption and Social Trust: An Experimental Approach.” Rationality and Society 21 (1): 81–112. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463108099349.

Shacklock, Arthur, and Fredrik Galtung. 2016. Measuring Corruption. Routledge.

Slonim, Robert, and Pablo Guillen. 2010. “Gender Selection Discrimination: Evidence from a Trust Game.” Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization 76 (2): 385–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2010.06.016.

Tang, Thomas Li-Ping, Toto Sutarso, Mahfooz A. Ansari, Vivien K. G. Lim, Thompson S. H. Teo, Fernando Arias-Galicia, Ilya E. Garber, et al. 2018. “Monetary Intelligence and Behavioral Economics: The Enron Effect—Love of Money, Corporate Ethical Values, Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), and Dishonesty Across 31 Geopolitical Entities.” Journal of Business Ethics 148 (4): 919–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2942-4.

Tech, Catherine C. Eckel (virginia, and Political Science. n.d. “Conditional Trust: Sex, Race and Facial Expressions in a Trust Game.”

Waismel-Manor, Israel, Patricia Moy, Rico Neumann, and Moran Shechnick. 2021. “Does Corruption Corrupt? The Behavioral Effects of Mediated Exposure to Corruption.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research.

Warren, Danielle E., and William S. Laufer. 2009. “Are Corruption Indices a Self-Fulfilling Prophecy? A Social Labeling Perspective of Corruption.” Journal of Business Ethics 88 (4): 841–49.

Wilson, Rick K., and Catherine C. Eckel. 2006. “Judging a Book by Its Cover: Beauty and Expectations in the Trust Game.” Political Research Quarterly 59 (2): 189–202. https://doi.org/10.1177/106591290605900202.

Woo, Jung-Yeop, and Uk Heo. 2009. “Corruption and Foreign Direct Investment Attractiveness in Asia.” Asian Politics & Policy 1 (2): 223–38.

Zhang, Nan. 2015. “Changing a ‘Culture’ of Corruption: Evidence from an Economic Experiment in Italy.” Rationality and Society 27 (4): 387–413. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043463115605475.

Zizzo, Daniel John. 2010. “Experimenter Demand Effects in Economic Experiments.” Experimental Economics 13 (1): 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10683-009-9230-z.

Zürn, Michael, and Sascha Topolinski. 2017. “When Trust Comes Easy: Articulatory Fluency Increases Transfers in the Trust Game.” Journal of Economic Psychology 61: 74–86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joep.2017.02.016.