An experiment on gender representation in majoritarian bargaining

Baranski, Andrzej and Geraldes, Diogo and Kovaliukaite, Ada and Tremewan, James (2022): An experiment on gender representation in majoritarian bargaining.

Abstract

Women are underrepresented in political and business decision-making bodies across the world. To investigate the causal effect of gender representation on multilateral negotiations, we experimentally manipulate the composition of triads in a majoritarian, divide-the-dollar game. First, we find that inclusive splits and unanimous agreement rates are highest in all-female groups and lowest in all-male groups suggesting that female representation increases fairness. Second, we document a robust gender gap in earnings, driven largely by the exclusion of women from coalitions rather than differential shares within coalitions. Interestingly, we find that distinct bargaining dynamics can underlie the same inequitable outcomes: While gender-biased outcomes are sometimes caused by outright discrimination, they can also be driven by more complex dynamics related to gender differences in bargaining strategies. These different dynamics manifest in mixed-gender coalitions being less stable when the excluded party is male rather than female.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: multilateral bargaining, gender gap, lab experiment
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C7 - Game Theory and Bargaining Theory > C72 - Noncooperative Games; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J1 - Demographic Economics > J16 - Economics of Gender ; Non-labor Discrimination; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials

References

Agranov, M. and Tergiman, C. (2014). Communication in multilateral bargaining. Journal of Public Economics, 118:75–85.

Andersen, S., Ertac, S., Gneezy, U., List, J. A., and Maximiano, S. (2018). On the cultural basis of gender differences in negotiation. Experimental Economics, 21(4):757–778.

Apesteguia, J., Azmat, G., and Iriberri, N. (2012). The impact of gender composition on team performance and decision making: Evidence from the field. Management Science, 58(1):78–93.

Azrieli, Y., Chambers, C. P., and Healy, P. J. (2018). Incentives in experiments: A theoretical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 126(4):1472–1503.

Baranski, A. and Kagel, J. H. (2015). Communication in legislative bargaining. Journal of the Economic science Association, 1(1):59–71.

Baranski, A. and Morton, R. ( forthcoming). The determinants of multilateral bargaining: A comprehensive analysis of Baron and Ferejohn majoritarian bargaining experiments. Experimental Economics.

Baron, D. P. and Ferejohn, J. A. (1989). Bargaining in legislatures. American political science review, 83(4):1181–1206.

Bilén, D., Dreber, A., and Johannesson, M. (2020). Are women more generous than men? a meta-analysis. Mimeo. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id= 3578038.

Bordalo, P., Coffman, K., Gennaioli, N., and Shleifer, A. (2019). Beliefs about gender. American Economic Review, 109(3):739–73.

Born, A., Ranehill, E., and Sandberg, A. (2020). Gender and willingness to lead: Does the gender composition of teams matter? Review of Economics and Statistics, pages 1–46.

Bourreau-Dubois, C., Doriat-Duban, M., Jeandidier, B., and Ray, J.-C. (2020). Does gender diversity in panels of judges matter? evidence from french child support cases. International Review of Law and Economics, 63:105929.

Boyd, C. L., Epstein, L., and Martin, A. D. (2010). Untangling the causal effects of sex on judging. American journal of political science, 54(2):389–411.

Camerer, C. F., Nave, G., and Smith, A. (2019). Dynamic unstructured bargaining with private information: theory, experiment, and outcome prediction via machine learning. Management Science, 65(4):1867–1890.

Cason, T. N., Gangadharan, L., and Grossman, P. J. (2021). Gender, beliefs, and coordination with externalities. Mimeo.

Castillo, M., Petrie, R., Torero, M., and Vesterlund, L. (2013). Gender differences in bargaining outcomes: A field experiment on discrimination. Journal of Public Economics, 99:35–48.

Coffman, K. B. (2014). Evidence on self-stereotyping and the contribution of ideas. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 129(4):1625–1660.

Cooper, D. J. and Kagel, J. H. (2016). A failure to communicate: an experimental investigation of the effects of advice on strategic play. European Economic Review, 82:24–45.

Diermeier, D. and Gailmard, S. (2006). Self-interest, inequality, and entitlement in majoritarian decision-making. Quarterly Journal of Political Science, 1(4):327–350.

Diermeier, D. and Morton, R. (2005). Experiments in majoritarian bargaining. In Social choice and strategic decisions, pages 201–226. Springer.

Eckel, C., De Oliveira, A. C., and Grossman, P. J. (2008). Gender and negotiation in the small: are women (perceived to be) more cooperative than men? Negotiation Journal, 24(4):429–445.

Eckel, C. C. and Grossman, P. J. (2001). Chivalry and solidarity in ultimatum games. Economic inquiry, 39(2):171–188.

Engel, C. (2011). Dictator games: A meta study. Experimental economics, 14(4):583–610.

Eriksson, K. H. and Sandberg, A. (2012). Gender differences in initiation of negotiation: Does the gender of the negotiation counterpart matter? Negotiation Journal, 28(4):407–428.

Ertac, S. and Gurdal, M. Y. (2012). Deciding to decide: Gender, leadership and risk-taking in groups. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1):24–30.

Exley, C. L., Niederle, M., and Vesterlund, L. (2020). Knowing when to ask: The cost of leaning in. Journal of Political Economy, 128(3):816–854.

Fehr, E., Naef, M., and Schmidt, K. M. (2006). Inequality aversion, efficiency, and maximin preferences in simple distribution experiments: Comment. American Economic Review, 96(5):1912–1917.

Fischbacher, U. (2007). z-tree: Zurich toolbox for ready-made economic experiments. Experimental Economics, 10(2):171–178.

Fréchette, G., Kagel, J. H., and Morelli, M. (2005). Nominal bargaining power, selection protocol, and discounting in legislative bargaining. Journal of Public Economics, 89(8):1497–1517.

Geraldes, D. (2020). Women dislike competing against men. SSRN Working Paper 3741649 https://papers.ssrn.com/abstract=3741649. Last accessed December 5, 2020.

Hernandez-Arenaz, I. and Iriberri, N. (2018). Women ask for less (only from men): Evidence from bargaining in the field. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 152:192–214.

Hernandez-Arenaz, I. and Iriberri, N. (2020). Gender differences in alternating-offer bargaining: An experimental study. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP12561, Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3098157. Last accessed December 5, 2020.

Huang, J., Krivkovich, A., Starikova, I., Yee, L., and Zanoschi, D. (2019). Women in the workplace. Retrieved from McKinsey & Co. website: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/gender-equality/women-in-the-workplace-2019. Last accessed December 13, 2020.

Inter-parliamentary Union (2020). 25 years after Beijing, IPU analysis shows that gender parity is possible [press release]. https://www.ipu.org/news/press-releases/2020-03/25-years-after-beijing-ipu-analysis-shows-gender-parity-possible. Last accessed December 5, 2020.

Kagel, J. H., Sung, H., and Winter, E. (2010). Veto power in committees: an experimental study. Experimental Economics, 13(2):167–188.

Lane, T. (2016). Discrimination in the laboratory: A meta-analysis of economics experiments. European Economic Review, 90:375–402.

Laroze, D., Hugh-Jones, D., and Leininger, A. (2020). The impact of group identity on coalition formation. Research & Politics, 7(4).

Leibbrandt, A. and List, J. A. (2015). Do women avoid salary negotiations? evidence from a large-scale natural field experiment. Management Science, 61(9):2016–2024.

McGee, P. and Constantinides, S. (2013). Repeated play and gender in the ultimatum game. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 42:121–126.

Niederle, M. and Vesterlund, L. (2007). Do women shy away from competition? do men compete too much? The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 122(3):1067–1101.

Rand, D. G., Brescoll, V. L., Everett, J. A., Capraro, V., and Barcelo, H. (2016). Social heuristics and social roles: Intuition favors altruism for women but not for men. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(4):389.

Ranehill, E. and Weber, R. A. (forthcoming). Gender preference gaps and voting for redistribution. Experimental Economics.

Recalde, M. and Vesterlund, L. (2020). Gender differences in negotiation and policy for improvement. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.

Reuben, E., Rey-Biel, P., Sapienza, P., and Zingales, L. (2012). The emergence of male leadership in competitive environments. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 83(1):111–117.

Reuben, E. and Timko, K. (2018). On the effectiveness of elected male and female leaders and team coordination. Journal of the Economic Science Association, 4(2):123–135.

Roth, A. (1987). Bargaining phenomena and bargaining theory. In Roth, A., editor, Laboratory Experimentation in Economics: Six Points of View, pages 14–41. Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK.

Roth, A. E. (1995). Introduction to experimental economics. In Kagel, J. H. and Roth, A. E., editors, The Handbook of Experimental Economics, volume 1, pages 3–110. Princeton University Press.

Roth, A. E., Malouf, M. W., and Murnighan, J. K. (1981). Sociological versus strategic factors in bargaining. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 2(2):153–177.

Roth, A. E. and Murnighan, J. K. (1982). The role of information in bargaining: An experimental study. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, pages 1123–1142.

Säve-Söderbergh, J. (2019). Gender gaps in salary negotiations: Salary requests and starting salaries in the field. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 161:35–51.

Shan, X. (2020). Does minority status drive women out of male-dominated fields? Mimeo. Retrieved from https://sites.google.com/view/xiaoyueshan/research. Last accessed December 15, 2020.

Siegenthaler, S. and Kamm, A. (2021). Timing of commitment in coalitional bargaining. Available at SSRN 3779570.

Solnick, S. J. (2001). Gender differences in the ultimatum game. Economic Inquiry, 39(2):189–200.

Stoddard, O., Karpowitz, C., and Preece, J. (2020). Strength in numbers: A field experiment in gender, influence, and group dynamics.

Sutter, M., Bosman, R., Kocher, M. G., and van Winden, F. (2009). Gender pairing and bargaining—beware the same sex! Experimental Economics, 12(3):318–331.

Tremewan, J. and Vanberg, C. (2020). Voting rules in multilateral bargaining: using an experiment to relax procedural assumptions. Mimeo.