A Kaleckian growth model of secular stagnation with induced innovation

Stamegna, Marco (2022): A Kaleckian growth model of secular stagnation with induced innovation.

Abstract

The present paper works out a demand-led growth model of a labour-constrained economy with an endogenous direction of technical change. It draws on the Kaleckian-Steindlian tradition to examine the short-run relation between income distribution, capacity utilization, and capital accumulation; on Goodwin-type growth cycle models to investigate the dynamic interaction between labour market and distributive conflict; on the induced innovation literature to link labour productivity growth to income distribution. The model defines a two-dimensional system of differential equations in the wage share and the employment rate at full capacity to investigate the properties of the long-run equilibrium. In a Kaleckian fashion, an endogenous rate of capacity utilization allows effective demand and income distribution to affect the long-run equilibrium. We find that: i) an exogenous increase in workers’ bargaining power raises the long-run labour share, capital accumulation, labour productivity growth, and real wage growth, regardless of the short-run demand and growth regime of the economy; ii) a positive institutional shock to the labour share may cause the long-run employment rate to fall even in a wage-led demand regime; conversely, iii) positive technology shocks reduce the long-run rate of growth of the economy in a wage-led growth regime; thus, strengthening labour market regulation emerges as an unambiguously better strategy to raise the long-run labour share, capital accumulation, and labour productivity growth.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Functional income distribution; effective demand; growth regimes; endogenous technical change
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E1 - General Aggregative Models > E12 - Keynes ; Keynesian ; Post-Keynesian; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E24 - Employment ; Unemployment ; Wages ; Intergenerational Income Distribution ; Aggregate Human Capital ; Aggregate Labor Productivity; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E2 - Consumption, Saving, Production, Investment, Labor Markets, and Informal Economy > E25 - Aggregate Factor Income Distribution; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O4 - Economic Growth and Aggregate Productivity > O40 - General

References

Amadeo, E.J. (1986), “Notes on capacity utilization, distribution and accumulation”, Contributions to Political Economy, 5(1): 83-94.

Barbosa-Filho, N.H. and Taylor, L. (2006), “Distributive and demand cycles in the U.S. economy – A structuralist Goodwin model”, Metroeconomica, 57(3): 389-411.

Barrales-Ruiz, J., Mendieta-Muñoz, I., Rada, C., Tavani, D., and von Arnim, R. (2021), “The distributive cycle: Evidence and current debates”, Journal of Economic Surveys, 36(2): 468-503.

Bhaduri, A. and Marglin, S. (1990), “Unemployment and the real wage: the economic basis for contesting political ideologies”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 14(4): 375-393.

Brugger, F. and Gehrke, C. (2017), “The neoclassical approach to induced technical change: from Hicks to Acemoglu”, Metroeconomica, 68(4): 730-776.

Cassetti, M. (2003), “Bargaining power, effective demand and technical progress: a Kaleckian model of growth”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 27(3): 449-464.

Dutt, A.K. (1984), “Stagnation, income distribution and monopoly power”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 8(1): 25-40.

Dutt, A.K. (1992), “Conflict inflation, distribution, cyclical accumulation and crises”, European Journal of Political Economy, 8(4): 579-597.

Dutt, A.K. (2006), “Aggregate demand, aggregate supply and economic growth”, International Review of Applied Economics, 20(3): 319-336.

Dutt, A.K. (2013), “Endogenous technical change in classical-Marxian models of growth and distribution”, in Taylor, L., Michl, T. and Rezai, A. (eds), Social fairness and economics: Economic essays in the spirit of Duncan Foley, New York: Routledge: 264-285.

Dutt, A.K. (2018), “Heterodox theories of economic growth and income distribution: a partial survey”, in Veneziani, R. and Zamparelli, L. (eds.), Analytical political economy, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell: 103-138.

Flaschel, P. and Skott, P. (2006), “Steindlian models of growth and stagnation”, Metroeconomica, 57(3): 303-338.

Foley, D.K. (2003), “Endogenous technical change with externalities in a classical growth model”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 52(2): 167-189.

Foley, D.K., Michl, T.R., and Tavani, D. (2019), Growth and distribution. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

Girardi, D. and Pariboni, R. (2019), “Normal utilization as the adjusting variable in Neo-Kaleckian growth models: A critique”, Metroeconomica, 70(2): 341-358.

Goodwin, R. (1967), “A growth cycle”, in Feinstein, C. (ed.), Socialism, capitalism, and economic growth, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Hansen, A.H. (1939), “Economic Progress and Declining Population Growth”, American Economic Review, 29 (1): 1-15.

Hein, E. (2014), Distribution and growth after Keynes: A post-Keynesian guide, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Hein, E. (2016), “Secular stagnation or stagnation policy? Steindl after Summers”, PSL Quarterly Review, 69(276): 3-47.

Hein, E. (2017), “The Bhaduri–Marglin post-Kaleckian model in the history of distribution and growth theories: An assessment by means of model closures”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 5(2): 218-238.

Hicks, J.R. (1932), The theory of wages, London: Macmillan. Julius, A. J., (2005), “Steady-state growth and distribution with an endogenous direction of technical change”, Metroeconomica, 56(1): 101-125.

Kaldor, N. (1955-56), “Alternative theories of distribution”, The Review of Economic Studies, 23(2): 83-100.

Kaldor, N. (1957), “A model of economic growth”, Economic Journal, 67(268): 591-624.

Kaldor, N. (1966), Causes of the slow rate of economic growth in the United Kingdom, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kalecki, M. (1971), Selected essays on the dynamics of capitalist economy, 1933-1970, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kennedy, C. (1964), “Induced bias in innovation and the theory of distribution”, Economic Journal, 74(295): 541-547.

Keynes, J.M. (1936), The general theory of employment, interest, and money, London: Palgrave Macmillan.

Lavoie, M. (1995), “The Kaleckian model of growth and distribution and its neo-Ricardian and neo-Marxian critiques”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 19(6): 789-818.

Lavoie, M. (2009), “Cadrisme within a post-Keynesian model of growth and distribution”, Review of Political Economy, 21(3): 369-391.

Lavoie, M. (2014), Post-Keynesian economics: New foundations, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.

Lima, G.T. (2004), “Endogenous technological innovation, capital accumulation and distributional dynamics”, Metroeconomica, 55(4): 386-408.

Luzuriaga, M.C. and Tavani, D. (2021), “Classical political economy and secular stagnation”, FMM Working Paper, n. 71.

Marglin, S.A. and Bhaduri, A. (1990), “Profit squeeze and Keynesian theory”, in Marglin, S.A. and Schor, J.B. (eds.), The golden age of capitalism: Reinterpreting the postwar experience, Oxford: Clarendon Press: 153-186.

Marx, K. (1976), Capital: A critique of political economy, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books Limited.

Nikiforos, M. (2016), “On the ‘Utilization Controversy’: A theoretical and empirical discussion of the Kaleckian model of growth and distribution”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 40(2): 437-467.

Okishio N. (1961), “Technical change and the rate of profit”, Kobe University Economic Review, 7: 86-99.

Palley, T.I. (2019), “The fallacy of the natural rate of interest and zero lower bound economics: why negative interest rates may not remedy Keynesian unemployment”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 7(2): 151-170.

Petach, L. and Tavani, D. (2020), “Income shares, secular stagnation and the long-run distribution of wealth”, Metroeconomica, 71(1): 235-255.

Rada, C., Santetti, M., Schiavone, A., von Arnim, R. (2021), “Post-Keynesian vignettes on secular stagnation: From labor suppression to natural growth”, University of Utah, Department of Economics, n. 2021-05.

Rowthorn, B. (1981), “Demand, real wages and economic growth”, Thames Papers in Political Economy, Autumn: 1-39.

Samuelson, P. (1965), “A theory of induced innovation along Kennedy-Weizsäcker lines”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 47(4): 343-356.

Sasaki, H. (2013), “Cyclical growth in a Goodwin–Kalecki–Marx model”, Journal of Economics, 108: 145-171.

Shah, A. and Desai, M.J. (1981), “Growth cycles with induced technical change”, Economic Journal, 91(364): 1006-1010.

Skott, P. (1989), Conflict and effective demand in economic growth, Cambridge, UK and New York: Cambridge University Press.

Skott, P. (2010), “Growth, instability and cycles: Harrodian and Kaleckian models of accumulation and income distribution”, in Setterfield, M. (ed.), Handbook of alternative theories of economic growth, Cheltenham: Edward Elgar: 108-131.

Skott, P. (2017), “Weaknesses of ‘wage-led growth’”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 5(3): 336-359.

Steindl, J (1976), Maturity and stagnation in American capitalism, New York: Monthly Review Press.

Steindl, J (1979), “Stagnation theory and stagnation policy”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 3: 1-14.

Stockhammer, E. (2004), “Is there an equilibrium rate of unemployment in the long run?”, Review of Political Economy, 16(1): 59-77.

Storm, S. and Naastepad, C.W.M. (2012a), Macroeconomics beyond the NAIRU, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Storm, S. and Naastepad, C.W.M. (2012b), “Wage-led or profit-led supply: wages, productivity and investment”, Conditions of Work and Employment Series n. 36, ILO.

Summers, L.A. (2014a), “U.S. economic prospects: Secular Stagnation, hysteresis, and the zero lower bound”, Business Economics: 49(2): 65-73.

Summers, L.A. (2014b), “Reflections on the ‘New Secular Stagnation Hypothesis’”, in Teulings, C. and Baldwin, R. (eds.), Secular stagnation: facts, causes and cures, London: Centre for Economic Policy Research (CEPR): 27-38.

Summers, L.A. (2015), “Demand side secular stagnation”, American Economic Review, 105(5): 60-65.

Tavani, D. (2012), “Wage bargaining and induced technical change in a linear economy: Model and application to the US (1963–2003)” Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23(2): 117-126.

Tavani, D. (2013), “Bargaining over productivity and wages when technical change is induced: implications for growth, distribution, and employment”, Journal of Economics, 109: 207-244.

Tavani, D. and Zamparelli, L. (2015), “Endogenous technical change, employment and distribution in the Goodwin model of the growth cycle”, Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and Econometrics, 19(2): 209-226.

Tavani, D. and Zamparelli, L. (2018), “Endogenous technical change in alternative theories of growth and distribution”, in Veneziani, R. and Zamparelli, L. (eds.), Analytical political economy, Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell: 139-174.

Taylor, L. (1985), “A stagnationist model of economic growth”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 9(4): 383-403.

Taylor, L., Foley, D.K. and Rezai, A. (2018), “Demand drives growth all the way: Goodwin, Kaldor, Pasinetti and the Steady State”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 43(5): 1333-1352.

Trezzini, A. and Pignalosa, D. (2021), “The normal degree of capacity utilization: the history of a controversial concept”, Centro Sraffa Working Papers, n. 49.

van der Ploeg, F. (1987), “Growth cycles, induced technical change, and perpetual conflict over the distribution of income”, Journal of Macroeconomics, 9(1): 1-12.

von Arnim, R. and Barrales, J. (2015), “Demand-driven Goodwin cycles with Kaldorian and Kaleckian features”, Review of Keynesian Economics, 3(3): 351-373.

You, J-I. (1994), “Macroeconomic structure, endogenous technical change and growth”, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18: 213-233.

Zamparelli, L. (2015), “Induced innovation, endogenous technical change and income distribution in a labor-constrained model of classical growth”, Metroeconomica, 66(2): 243-262.

Zipperer, B. and Skott, P. (2011), “Cyclical patterns of employment, utilization, and profitability”, Journal of Post Keynesian Economics, 34(1): 25-57.