Gerling, Charlotte and Schöttker, Oliver and Hearne, John (2022): The climate adaptation problem in biodiversity conservation: the role of reversible conservation investments in optimal reserve design under climate change.
This is the latest version of this item.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_114503.pdf Download (689kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Climate change causes range shifts of species and habitats, thus making existing reserve networks less suitable in the future. Climate change hence changes the comparative advantage of some sites over others with respect to "producing" habitat. In order to maintain cost-effectiveness, reserve networks therefore have to be adapted. In principle, reserve networks may be adapted to climate change in two ways: by providing additional funds and/or allowing for the sale of sites to liquidate funds for new purchases. However, due to negative ecological consequences, selling is often regulated, thus rendering the optimal reserve design a problem of irreversible investment decisions. Respectively, allowing for sale may be interpreted as an investment with costly reversibility, as transaction costs do not allow for full recovery of the initial investment. Here, we assess the gains in terms of cost-effectiveness achieved when allowing for sale as well as the costs of this flexibility in terms of habitat turnover given climate change-induced changes in comparative advantages. To do so, we develop a conceptual climate-ecological-economic model to find the optimal time series for the reserve design problem under changing climatic conditions and different policy scenarios. These scenarios differ in the size of additional funds for climate adaptations and whether selling is allowed. Our results show that the advantage of selling is large when no additional funds are available and decreases as the amount of additional capital increases. Moreover, we find that due to climate change, habitat turnover occurs even in a static reserve network, but the loss in habitat permanence when allowing for sale is smallest for the most threatened habitat type. We hence identify a new trade-off in the evaluation of land purchase to adapt biodiversity conservation to climate change: while not allowing for sale mainly benefits the habitat permanence of the expanding habitat type, allowing for sale mainly benefits the outcome for the contracting habitat type.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | The climate adaptation problem in biodiversity conservation: the role of reversible conservation investments in optimal reserve design under climate change |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Biodiversity; climate adaptation; climate-ecological-economic model; spatial flexibility; habitat permanence; irreversible investment; investment with costly reversibility; selling reserve sites |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q57 - Ecological Economics: Ecosystem Services ; Biodiversity Conservation ; Bioeconomics ; Industrial Ecology Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 114503 |
Depositing User: | Oliver Schöttker |
Date Deposited: | 11 Sep 2022 11:43 |
Last Modified: | 11 Sep 2022 11:43 |
References: | Abel, A. B. and Eberly, J. C. (1996). Optimal investment with costly reversibility. The Review of Economic Studies, 63(4):581–593. Alagador, D. and Cerdeira, J. O. (2020). Revisiting the minimum set cover, the maximal coverage problems and a maximum benefit area selection problem to make climate–change–concerned conservation plans effective. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 11(10):1325–1337. Alagador, D. and Cerdeira, J. O. (2021). Operations research and cost-effective spatial conservation planning: Data, models, tools and future directions. Preprints 2021. Alagador, D., Cerdeira, J. O., and Araújo, M. B. (2014). Shifting protected areas: scheduling spatial priorities under climate change. Journal of Applied Ecology, 51(3):703–713. Alagador, D., Cerdeira, J. O., and Araújo, M. B. (2016). Climate change, species range shifts and dispersal corridors: an evaluation of spatial conservation models. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(7):853–866. Albers, H. J. (1996). Modeling ecological constraints on tropical forest management: Spatial interdependence, irreversibility, and uncertainty. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 30(1):73–94. Ando, A. W., Camm, J., Polasky, S., and Solow, A. (1998). Species distributions, land values, and efficient conservation. Science, 279(5359):2126–2128. Ando, A. W. and Hannah, L. (2011). Lessons from finance for new land-conservation strategies given climate-change uncertainty. Conservation Biology, 25(2):412–414. Arafeh-Dalmau, N., Brito-Morales, I., Schoeman, D. S., Possingham, H. P., Klein, C. J., and Richardson, A. J. (2020). Incorporating climate velocity into the design of climate-smart networks of protected areas. bioRxiv. Armsworth, P. R., Acs, S., Dallimer, M., Gaston, K. J., Hanley, N., and Wilson, P. (2012). The cost of policy simplification in conservation incentive programs. Ecology letters, 15(5):406–414. Armsworth, P. R., Daily, G. C., Kareiva, P., and Sanchirico, J. N. (2006). Land market feedbacks can undermine biodiversity conservation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 103(14):5403–5408. Arrow, K. J. (1968). Optimal capital policy with irreversible investment. In Wolfe, J. N., editor, Value, Capital and Growth, Papers in Honour of Sir John Hicks, pages 1–19. Edinburgh University Press, Edinburgh. Arrow, K. J. and Fisher, A. C. (1974). Environmental preservation, uncertainty, and irreversibility. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 88(2):312. Baldwin, C. Y. (1982). Optimal sequential investment when capital is not readily reversible. The Journal of Finance, 37(3):763–782. Bezanson, J., Edelman, A., Karpinski, S., and Shah, V. B. (2017). Julia: A Fresh Approach to Numerical Computing. SIAM Review, 59(1):65–98. Brunette, M., Costa, S., and Lecocq, F. (2014). Economics of species change subject to risk of climate change and increasing information: a (quasi-)option value analysis. Annals of Forest Science, 71(2):279–290. Brunette, M., Hanewinkel, M., and Yousefpour, R. (2020). Risk aversion hinders forestry professionals to adapt to climate change. Climatic Change, 162(4):2157–2180. Campos-Cerqueira, M., Terando, A. J., Murray, B. A., Collazo, J. A., and Aide, T. M. (2021). Climate change is creating a mismatch between protected areas and suitable habitats for frogs and birds in Puerto Rico. Biodiversity and Conservation, 30(12):3509–3528. Church, R. L., Stoms, D. M., and Davis, F. W. (1996). Reserve selection as a maximal covering location problem. Biological Conservation, 76(2):105–112. Costanza, R. and Voinov, A. (2001). Modeling ecological and economic systems with stella: Part iii. Ecological Modelling, 143(1-2):1–7. Costello, C. and Polasky, S. (2004). Dynamic reserve site selection. Resource and Energy Economics, 26(2):157–174. Dasgupta, P. (2021). The Economics of Biodiversity: The Dasgupta Review. Technical report, HM Treasury, London. Davis, G. A. and Cairns, R. D. (2017). The odd notion of “reversible investment”. Journal of Banking & Finance, 81:172–180. Dissanayake, S. T. and Önal, H. (2011). Amenity driven price effects and conservation reserve site selection: A dynamic linear integer programming approach. Ecological Economics, 70(12):2225–2235. Dissanayake, S. T., Önal, H., Westervelt, J. D., and Balbach, H. E. (2012). Incorporating species relocation in reserve design models: An example from ft. benning ga. Ecological Modelling, 224(1):65–75. Drechsler, M. (2020a). Conservation management in the face of climatic uncertainty – the roles of flexibility and robustness. Ecological Complexity, 43:100849. Drechsler, M. (2020b). Conservation management in the face of climatic uncertainty – the roles of flexibility and robustness. Ecological Complexity, 43:100849. Drechsler, M. (2020c). Ecological-economic Modelling for Biodiversity Bonservation. Ecology, Biodiversity and Conservation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Drechsler, M. and Hartig, F. (2011). Conserving biodiversity with tradable permits under changing conservation costs and habitat restoration time lags. Ecological Economics, 70(3):533–541. Drechsler, M. and Johst, K. (2010). Rapid viability analysis for metapopulations in dynamic habitat networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 277(1689):1889–1897. Drechsler, M. and Johst, K. (2017). Rapid assessment of metapopulation viability under climate and land-use change. Ecological Complexity, 31:125–134. Drechsler, M. and Wätzold, F. (2020). Biodiversity conservation in a dynamic world may lead to inefficiencies due to lock-in effects and path dependence. Ecological Economics, 173:106652. Drechsler, M., Wätzold, F., and Grimm, V. (2022). The hitchhiker’s guide to generic ecological-economic modelling of land-use-based biodiversity conservation policies. Ecological Modelling, 465:109861. Duke, J. M., Dundas, S. J., Johnston, R. J., and Messer, K. D. (2014). Prioritizing payment for environmental services: Using nonmarket benefits and costs for optimal selection. Ecological Economics, 105:319–329. Dunning, I., Huchette, J., and Lubin, M. (2017). Jump: A modeling language for mathematical optimization. SIAM Review, 59(2):295–320. Evans, T. G., Diamond, S. E., and Kelly, M. W. (2015). Mechanistic species distribution modelling as a link between physiology and conservation. Conservation Physiology, 3(1):cov056. Faccioli, M., Riera Font, A., and Torres Figuerola, C. M. (2015). Valuing the recreational benefits of wetland adaptation to climate change: a trade-off between species’ abundance and diversity. Environmental management, 55(3):550–563. Fuller, R. A., McDonald-Madden, E., Wilson, K. A., Carwardine, J., Grantham, H. S., Watson, J. E. M., Klein, C. J., Green, D. C., and Possingham, H. P. (2010). Replacing underperforming protected areas achieves better conservation outcomes. Nature, 466(7304):365–367. Fung, E., Imbach, P., Corrales, L., Vilchez, S., Zamora, N., Argotty, F., Hannah, L., and Ramos, Z. (2017). Mapping conservation priorities and connectivity pathways under climate change for tropical ecosystems. Climatic Change, 141(1):77–92. Gerling, C., Drechsler, M., Keuler, K., Leins, J. A., Radtke, K., Schulz, B., Sturm, A., and Wätzold, F. (2022). Climate-ecological-economic modelling for the cost-effective spatio-temporal allocation of conservation measures in cultural landscapes facing climate change. Q Open. Gerling, C. and Wätzold, F. (2021). An economic evaluation framework for land–use–based conservation policy instruments in a changing climate. Conservation Biology, 35(3):824–833. Graham, V., Baumgartner, J. B., Beaumont, L. J., Esperón-Rodríguez, M., and Grech, A. (2019). Prioritizing the protection of climate refugia: designing a climate-ready protected area network. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 62(14):2588–2606. Gray, L. (2003). A mathematician looks at Wolfram’s new kind of science. Notices-American Mathematical Society, 50(2):200–211. Grimm, V., Johnston, A. S. A., Thulke, H.-H., Forbes, V. E., and Thorbek, P. (2020). Three questions to ask before using model outputs for decision support. Nature Communications, 11(1):4959. Gurobi Optimization, LLC (2021). Gurobi Optimizer Reference Manual. Hamaide, B., Albers, H. J., and Busby, G. (2014). Backup coverage models in nature reserve site selection with spatial spread risk heterogeneity. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 48(2):158–167. Hanemann, W. (1989). Information and the concept of option value. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 16(1):23–37. Hardy, M. J., Fitzsimons, J. A., Bekessy, S. A., and Gordon, A. (2018). Purchase, protect, resell, repeat: an effective process for conserving biodiversity on private land? Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 16(6):336–344. Hartman, R. and Hendrickson, M. (2002). Optimal partially reversible investment. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26(3):483–508. Heller, N. E. and Zavaleta, E. S. (2009). Biodiversity management in the face of climate change: A review of 22 years of recommendations. Biological Conservation, 142(1):14–32. Hily, E., Wätzold, F., and Drechsler, M. (2017). Cost-effectiveness of conservation payment schemes under climate change. Working Papers Cahiers du LEF 2017-01, Laboratoire d’Economie Forestiere, AgroParisTech-INRA. Huber, R., Rebecca, S., Francois, M., Hanna, B. S., Dirk, S., and Robert, F. (2017). Interaction effects of targeted agri-environmental payments on non-marketed goods and services under climate change in a mountain region. Land Use Policy, 66:49–60. Jafari, N. and Hearne, J. (2013). A new method to solve the fully connected reserve network design problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 231(1):202–209. Jafari, N., Nuse, B. L., Moore, C. T., Dilkina, B., and Hepinstall-Cymerman, J. (2017). Achieving full connectivity of sites in the multiperiod reserve network design problem. Computers & Operations Research, 81:119–127. Johst, K., Drechsler, M., Mewes, M., Sturm, A., and Wätzold, F. (2015). A novel modeling approach to evaluate the ecological effects of timing and location of grassland conservation measures. Biological Conservation, 182:44–52. Johst, K., Drechsler, M., and Wätzold, F. (2002). An ecological-economic modelling procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatio-temporal allocation of species protection measures. Ecological Economics, 41(1):37–49. Kassar, I. and Lasserre, P. (2004). Species preservation and biodiversity value: a real options approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48(2):857–879. Lachaud, M. A., Bravo-Ureta, B. E., and Ludena, C. E. (2021). Economic effects of climate change on agricultural production and productivity in latin america and the caribbean (lac). Agricultural Economics. Lamprecht, A., Semenchuk, P. R., Steinbauer, K., Winkler, M., and Pauli, H. (2018). Climate change leads to accelerated transformation of high-elevation vegetation in the central alps. The New Phytologist, 220(2):447–459. Lawler, J. J., Rinnan, D. S., Michalak, J. L., Withey, J. C., Randels, C. R., and Possingham, H. P. (2020). Planning for climate change through additions to a national protected area network: implications for cost and configuration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 375(1794):20190117. Lennox, G. D., Fargione, J., Spector, S., Williams, G., and Armsworth, P. R. (2017). The value of flexibility in conservation financing. Conservation Biology, 31(3):666–674. Leroux, A. D., Martin, V. L., and Goeschl, T. (2009). Optimal conservation, extinction debt, and the augmented quasi-option value. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 58(1):43–57. Lewis, D. J. and Polasky, S. (2018). An auction mechanism for the optimal provision of ecosystem services under climate change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 92:20–34. Lundhede, T. H., Jacobsen, J. B., Hanley, N., Fjelds ̊a, J., Rahbek, C., Strange, N., and Thorsen, B. J. (2014). Public support for conserving bird species runs counter to climate change impacts on their distributions. PloS one, 9(7):e101281. McDonald-Madden, E., Bode, M., Game, E. T., Grantham, H., and Possingham, H. P. (2008). The need for speed: informed land acquisitions for conservation in a dynamic property market. Ecology letters, 11(11):1169–1177. Mezey, E. W., , and Conrad, J. M. (2010). Real options in resource economics. Annual Review of Resource Economics, 2:33–52. Midgley, G. F., Davies, I. D., Albert, C. H., Altwegg, R., Hannah, L., Hughes, G. O., O’Halloran, L. R., Seo, C., Thorne, J. H., and Thuiller, W. (2010). Biomove - an integrated platform simulating the dynamic response of species to environmental change. Ecography, pages no–no. Miller, J. R. and Lad, F. (1984). Flexibility, learning, and irreversibility in environmental decisions: A bayesian approach. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 11(2):161–172. Montoya, D., Gaba, S., de Mazancourt, C., Bretagnolle, V., and Loreau, M. (2020). Reconciling biodiversity conservation, food production and farmers’ demand in agricultural landscapes. Ecological Modelling, 416. Moore, J. L., Folkmann, M., Balmford, A., Brooks, T., Burgess, N., Rahbek, C., Williams, P. H., and Krarup, J. (2003). Heuristic and optimal solutions for set-covering problems in conservation biology. Ecography, 26(5):595–601. Nalle, D. J., Montgomery, C. A., Arthur, J. L., Polasky, S., and Schumaker, N. H. (2004). Modeling joint production of wildlife and timber. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 48(3):997–1017. Nath, I. (2020). The Food Problem and the Aggregate Productivity Consequences of Climate Change. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research, Cambridge, MA. Önal, H. (2004). First-best, second-best, and heuristic solutions in conservation reserve site selection. Biological Conservation, 115(1):55–62. Önal, H. and Briers, R. A. (2003). Selection of a minimum–boundary reserve network using integer programming. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 270(1523):1487–1491. Önal, H. and Briers, R. A. (2005). Designing a conservation reserve network with minimal fragmentation: A linear integer programming approach. Environmental Modeling & Assessment, 10(3):193–202. Önal, H. and Briers, R. A. (2006). Optimal selection of a connected reserve network. Operations Research, 54(2):379–388. Pindyck, R. S. (1988). Irreversible investment, capacity choice, and the value of the firm. The American Economic Review, 78:969–985. Polasky, S., Camm, J. D., and Garber-Yonts, B. (2001). Selecting biological reserves cost-effectively: An application to terrestrial vertebrate conservation in oregon. Land Economics, 77(1):68–78. Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Camm, J. D., Csuti, B., Fackler, P., Lonsdorf, E., Montgomery, C., White, D., Arthur, J., Garber-Yonts, B., Haight, R., Kagan, J., Starfield, A., and Tobalske, C. (2008). Where to put things? spatial land management to sustain biodiversity and economic returns. Biological Conservation, 141(6):1505–1524. Polasky, S., Nelson, E., Lonsdorf, E., Fackler, P., and Starfield, A. (2005). Conserving species in a working landscape: Land use with biological and economic objectives. Ecological Applications, 15(4):1387–1401. Polasky, S. and Solow, A. R. (2001). The value of information in reserve site selection. Biodiversity and Conservation, 10(7):1051–1058. Ponce-Reyes, R., Plumptre, A. J., Segan, D., Ayebare, S., Fuller, R. A., Possingham, H. P., and Watson, J. E. (2017). Forecasting ecosystem responses to climate change across Africa’s Albertine Rift. Biological Conservation, 209:464–472. Possingham, H. P., Bode, M., and Klein, C. J. (2015). Optimal conservation outcomes require both restoration and protection. PLoS Biology, 13(1):e1002052. Pyke, C. R. and Fischer, D. T. (2005). Selection of bioclimatically representative biological reserve systems under climate change. Biological Conservation, 121(3):429–441. R Core Team (2018). R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. Ranius, T., Widenfalk, L. A., Seedre, M., Lindman, L., Felton, A., Hämäläinen, A., Filyushkina, A., and Öckinger, E. (2022). Protected area designation and management in a world of climate change: A review of recommendations. Ambio. Ray, D. K., West, P. C., Clark, M., Gerber, J. S., Prishchepov, A. V., and Chatterjee, S. (2019). Climate change has likely already affected global food production. PloS one, 14(5):e0217148 Schöttker, O., Johst, K., Drechsler, M., and Wätzold, F. (2016). Land for biodiversity conservation — to buy or borrow? Ecological Economics, 129:94–103. Schöttker, O. and Wätzold, F. (2018). Buy or lease land? cost-effective conservation of an oligotrophic lake in a natura 2000 area. Biodiversity and Conservation, 27(6):1327–1345. Schöttker, O. and Wätzold, F. (2022). Climate Change and the Cost-Effective Governance Mode for Biodiversity Conservation. Environmental and Resource Economics, 82(2):409–436. Simpson, K., de Vries, F., Dallimer, M., Armsworth, P., and Hanley, N. (2022). Ecological and economic implications of alternative metrics in biodiversity offset markets. Conservation Biology (under review). Simpson, K. H., de Vries, F., Dallimer, M., Armsworth, P. R., and Hanley, N. (2021). Understanding the performance of biodiversity offset markets: Evidence from an integrated ecological-economic model. Land Economics, 97(4):836–857. Snyder, S. A. and Haight, R. G. (2016). Application of the maximal covering location problem to habitat reserve site selection. International Regional Science Review, 39(1):28–47. Strange, N., Thorsen, B. J., and Bladt, J. (2006). Optimal reserve selection in a dynamic world. Biological Conservation, 131(1):33–41. Traeger, C. P. (2014). On option values in environmental and resource economics. Resource and Energy Economics, 37:242–252. van Langevelde, F., Claassen, F., and Schotman, A. (2002). Two strategies for conservation planning in human-dominated landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 58(2-4):281–295. Verbruggen, A. (2013). Revocability and reversibility in societal decision-making. Ecological Economics, 85:20–27. Vincent, C., Fernandes, R. F., Cardoso, A. R., Broennimann, O., Di Cola, V., D’Amen, M., Ursenbacher, S., Schmidt, B. R., Pradervand, J.-N., Pellissier, L., and Guisan, A. (2019). Climate and land-use changes reshuffle politically-weighted priority areas of mountain biodiversity. Global Ecology and Conservation, 17:e00589. Watts, K., Whytock, R. C., Park, K. J., Fuentes-Montemayor, E., Macgregor, N. A., Duffield, S., and McGowan, P. J. K. (2020). Ecological time lags and the journey towards conservation success. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(3):304–311. Wätzold, F. (2014). Climate change adaptation and biodiversity conservation: An economic perspective. In Albrecht, E., Schmidt, M., Mißler-Behr, M., and Spyra, S. P. N., editors, Implementing Adaptation Strategies by Legal, Economic and Planning Instruments on Climate Change, pages 187–195. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg. Wätzold, F., Drechsler, M., Johst, K., Mewes, M., and Sturm, A. (2016). A novel, spatiotemporally explicit ecological–economic modeling procedure for the design of cost–effective agri–environment schemes to conserve biodiversity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 98(2):489–512. Wilson, K. A., Lulow, M., Burger, J., Fang, Y.-C., Andersen, C., Olson, D., O’Connell, M., and McBride, M. F. (2011). Optimal restoration: accounting for space, time and uncertainty. Journal of Applied Ecology, 48(3):715–725. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/114503 |
Available Versions of this Item
-
Irreversible and partly reversible investments in the optimal reserve design problem: the role of flexibility under climate change. (deposited 25 Feb 2022 07:56)
- The climate adaptation problem in biodiversity conservation: the role of reversible conservation investments in optimal reserve design under climate change. (deposited 11 Sep 2022 11:43) [Currently Displayed]