Noland, Marcus (2022): Asia's push for monetary alternatives. Published in: Asia Pacific Issues No. 156 (1 December 2022): pp. 1-8.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_115527.pdf Download (407kB) | Preview |
Abstract
For the last quarter century, Asia has been seeking greater autonomy within the existing international monetary system. While the region has had the resources to go its own way, intraregional rivalries, and a reluctance to damage ties to the US and the International Monetary Fund, have put a damper on regional initiatives. Now the ascendency of China offers a path toward greater regional autonomy in monetary affairs. Asia, led by China, has been playing a two-track strategy pushing for greater influence within the existing global institutions, while developing its own parallel institutions such as the Chiang Mai Initiative Multilateralization, the Belt and Road Initiative, and the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. Use of the Chinese renminbi will likely grow as a trade invoicing currency but expanded use of the renminbi as a reserve currency is more uncertain. It is possible that the dollar-centered international financial system could evolve into a multipolar system with multiple currencies playing key roles.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Asia's push for monetary alternatives |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | international monetary system; Asia; China; renminbi |
Subjects: | F - International Economics > F3 - International Finance > F33 - International Monetary Arrangements and Institutions F - International Economics > F5 - International Relations, National Security, and International Political Economy > F53 - International Agreements and Observance ; International Organizations N - Economic History > N2 - Financial Markets and Institutions > N25 - Asia including Middle East |
Item ID: | 115527 |
Depositing User: | Marcus Noland |
Date Deposited: | 13 Dec 2022 08:04 |
Last Modified: | 13 Dec 2022 08:04 |
References: | Chorzempa, Martin. 2021. “China’s Pursuit of Leadership in Digital Currency,” Testimony before the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission, 15 April, https://www.uscc.gov/sites/default/files/2021-04/Martin_Chorzempa_Testimony.pdf accessed 5 August 2022. Clayton, Christopher, Amanda Dos Santos, Matteo Maggiori, and Jesse Schrager. 2022. “Internationalizing Like China,” NBER Working Paper 30336. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau for Economic Research. David Dollar. 2018.“Is China’s Development Finance a Challenge to the International Order?,” Asian Economic Policy Review 13(2) pp.283-302. Eichengreen, Barry, Arnaud Mehl, and Livia Chiţu. 2018. How Global Currencies Work: Past, Present, and Future. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Gopinath, Gita, and Jeremy C. Stein. 2018. “Trade Invoicing, Bank Funding, and Central Bank Reserve Holdings,” AEA Papers and Proceedings, 108: 542-546. Huang, Tianlei and Nicholas R. Lardy. 2022. “Private firms bear the brunt of China’s weak growth,” Realtime Economic Issues Watch. https://www.piie.com/blogs/realtime-economic-issues-watch/private-firms-bear-brunt-chinas-weak-growth. Accessed 3 August 2022. Lardy, Nicholas R. 2019. The State Strikes Back. Washington: Peterson Institute for International Economics. Malik, Ammar A., Bradley Parks, Brooke Russell, Joyce Jiahui Lin, Katherine Walsh, Kyra Solomon, Sheng Zhang, Thai-Binh Elston, and Seth Goodman. 2022. Banking on the Belt and Road. Williamsburg, VA: AidData at William & Mary. Neiman, Brent. 2022. “Better Cross-Border Lending and Better Cross-Border Borrowing,” Speech delivered at the Peterson Institute for International Economics, 20 September. Perks, Michael, Yudong Rao, Jongsoon Shin, and Kiichi Tokuoka. 2021. “Evolution of Bilateral Swap Lines,” IMF Working Paper WP/21/210. Washington: International Monetary Fund. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/115527 |