Di Cosmo, Valeria and Tiezzi, Silvia (2023): Let them Eat Cake? The Net Consumer Welfare Impact of Sin Taxes.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_116214.pdf Download (1MB) | Preview |
Abstract
When judging the distributional impact of a sin tax, what matters is not just how much low income people would pay but how much the tax would benefit or harm them overall. In this paper we assess the consumer welfare impact of a fat tax net of its expected benefits computed as savings from averted internalities. Using data on Italian consumers we estimate a censored Exact Affine Stone Index (EASI) incomplete demand system for food groups and simulate changes in purchases, calorie intake, consumers’ welfare and the monetary value of health benefits after the tax. Our results suggest costs from taxation larger than benefits at all income levels. As a fraction of income, the net impact would be regressively distributed.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Let them Eat Cake? The Net Consumer Welfare Impact of Sin Taxes |
English Title: | Let them Eat Cake? The Net Consumer Welfare Impact of Sin Taxes |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | sin taxes; internality benefits; welfare costs; exact affine stone index demand system; demand elasticities; micronutrients intake |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H22 - Incidence H - Public Economics > H2 - Taxation, Subsidies, and Revenue > H23 - Externalities ; Redistributive Effects ; Environmental Taxes and Subsidies I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I39 - Other |
Item ID: | 116214 |
Depositing User: | Dr Silvia Tiezzi |
Date Deposited: | 04 Feb 2023 07:13 |
Last Modified: | 04 Feb 2023 07:13 |
References: | Allcott, H., Lockwood, B. B. & Taubinsky, D. (2019a). Regressive sin taxes, with an applicatin to the optimal soda tax. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1557{1626. Allcott, H., Lockwood, B. B. & Taubinsky, D. (2019b). Should we tax sugar-sweetened beverages? an overview of theory and evidence. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 33 (3), 2019 Alpman, A. (2016). Implementing rubin's alternative multiple-imputation method for statistical matching in stata. The Stata Journal, 16 (3), 717-739. Banks, J., Blundell, R. & Lewbel, A. (1997). Quadratic engel curves and consumer demand. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 79 . Briggs, A., Mytton, O., Kehlbacher, A., Tiffin, R., Rayner, M. & Scarborough, P. (2013). Overall and income specific effect on prevalence of overweight and obesity of 20% sugar sweetened drink tax in uk: econometric and comparative risk assessment modelling study. BMJ, 347 (31). Brownell, K. D., Farley, T., Willett, W., Popkin, B. M., Chaloupka, F. J., Thompson, J. W. & Ludwig, D. S. (2009). The public health and economic benefits of taxing sugar-sweetened beverages. New England Journal of Medicine, 361 (16). Caro, J. C., Valizadeh, P., Correa, A., Silva, A. & Ng, S. W. (2020). Combined policies to promote healthier diets: Effects on purchases and consumer welfare. PLoS One, 15 (1). Cawley, J., Frisvold, J., Hill, A. & Jones, D. (2019). The impact of the philadelphia beverage tax on purchases and consumption by adults and children. Journal of Health Economics, 102225 (67). Cawley, J. & Meyerhoefer, C. (2012). The medical care costs of obesity: An instrumental variables approach. Journal of Health Economics, 31 (1), 219-230. Chouinard, H. H., Davis, D., LaFrance, J. & Perloff, J. (2007). Fat taxes: Big money for small change. Forum for Health Economics and Policy, 10 . Cohen, M. L. (1991). Statistical matching and microsimulation models. In C. F. Citro & E. A. Hanushek (Eds.), Improving information for social policy decisions { the uses of microsimulation modeling: Volume II, technical papers (pp. 62{88). National Academy Press. Cremer, H., Goulao, C. & Roeder, K. (2016). Earmarking and the political support of fat taxes. Journal of Health Economics, 50. Crudu, F., Neri, L. & Tiezzi, S. (2021). Family ties and child obesity in italy. Economics and Human Biology, 100951. Dall, T., Fulconi, V., Zhang, Y., Reimers, K., Packard, P. & Astwood, J. (2009). Potential health benefits and medical cost savings from calorie, sodium, and saturated fat reductions in the american diet. American Journal of Health Promotion, 23 , 412-422. Deaton, A. & Muellbauer, J. (1980). Economics and consumer behavior. Cambridge University Press. D'Orazio, M., Zio, M. D. & Scanu, M. (2006). Statistical Matching: Theory and Practice (Wiley Series in Survey Methodology). John Wiley & Sons. Dubois, P., Griffith, R. & O'Connell, M. (2020). How well targeted are soda taxes? The American Economic Review, 110 (11). Dubois, P., Griffith, R. & O'Connell, M. (2022). The use of scanner data for economics research. Annual Review of Economics, 14. Finkelstein, E. A., Zhen, C., Nonnemaker, J. & Todd, J. E. (2010, 12). Impact of targeted beverage taxes on higher- and lower-income households. Archives of Internal Medicine, 170 (22), 2028-2034. Griffith, R., Luhrmann, M., O'Connell, M. & Smith, K. (2016). Using taxation to reduce sugar consumption. IFS Briefing Note, BN180. Griffith, R., O'Connell, M., Smith, K. & Stroud, R. (2019). The evidence on the effects of soft drink taxes. IFS Briefing Note, BN255. Griffith, R., O'Connell, M., Smith, K. & Stroud, R. (2020). What's on the menu? policies to reduce young people's sugar consumption. Fiscal Studies, 41 (1), 165-197. Gruber, J. & Koszegi, B. (2004). Tax incidence when individuals are time-inconsistent: The case of cigarette excise taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 9-10 (88). Grummon, A. H., Lockwood, B. B., Taubinsky, D. & Allcott, H. (2019). Designing better sugary drink taxes: tax the sugar not the liquid. Science, 365 (6457). Hall, K. D., Sacks, G., Chandramohan, D., Chow, C. C., Wang, C., Gortmaker, S. L. & Swinburn, B. A. (2011). Quantification of the effect of energy imbalance on bodyweight. The Lancet, 378 (9793), 826-837. Hanemann, V. & Morey, E. (1992). Separability, partial demand systems, and consumer's surplus measures. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 22 (3). Harding, M. & Lovenheim, M. (2017). The effect of prices on nutrition: Comparing the impact of product and nutrient-specific taxes. Journal of Health Economics, 53. Harkanen, T., Kotakorpi, K., Pietinen, P., Pirttila, J., Reinivuo, H. & Suoniemi, I. (2014). The welfare effects of health-based food tax policy. Food Policy, 49. Heien, D. &Wesseils, C. R. (1990). Demand systems estimation with microdata: a censored regression approach. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 8. Hines, J. (2007). Taxing consumption and other sins. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 49-68 (21), 1. Irz, X. (2017). Demand for food and nutrients and its climate impact: A micro-econometric analysis of economic and socio-demographic drivers (Natural Resources and Bioeconomy Studies No. 28). Natural Resources Institute Finland, Helsinki. Jones, A. (2000). Health econometrics. In A. Culyer & J. Newhouse (Eds.), Handbook of health economics, vol. 1a (p. 265-336). Kao, K.-E., Jones, A., Ohinmaa, A. & Paulden, M. (2020). The health and �nancial impacts of a sugary drink tax across di�erent income groups in canada. Economics and Human Biology, 38 , 100869. LaFrance, J. & Hanemann, W. (1989). The dual structure of incomplete demand systems. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 71 (2). Lal, A., Mantilla-Herrera, A., Veerman, L., Backholer, K. & Sacks, M. e. a., G. an Moodie. (2017). Modelled health bene�ts of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax across different socioeconomic groups in australia: a cost-e�ectiveness and equity analysis. PLoS Med, 14 (June 6). Leicester, A. & Windmeijer, F. (2004). The fat tax: Economic incentives to reduce obesity (Brie�ng Note No. 49). Institute for Fiscal Studies. Lewbel, A. (1989). Identi�cation and estimation of equivalence scales under weak separability. The Review of Economic Studies, 56. Lewbel, A. & Pendakur, K. (2009). Tricks with hicks: The easi demand system. The American Economic Review, 99 (3), 827{863. Lin, B.-H., Smith, J.-Y., Travis A. Lee & Hall, K. D. (2011). Measuring weight outcomes for obesity intervention strategies: The case of a sugar-sweetened beverage tax. Economics and Human Biology, 9 (4), 329-341. McCullough, E., Shin, S., Arsenault, J. & Zhen, C. (2020). Harnessing food demand systems for improved nutrition in tanzania. (unpublished). Miao, Z., Begin, J. & Jensen, H. (2013). Accounting for product substitution in the analysis of food taxes targeting obesity. Health Economics, 22. Moriarity, C. & Scheuren, F. (2003). A note on rubin's statistical matching using �le concatenation with adjusted weights and multiple imputations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 21 (1), 65{73. Retrieved 2022-05-26. Muller, L., Lacroix, A., Lusk, J. & Ru�eux, B. (2017). Distributional impacts of fat taxes and thin subsidies. The Economic Journal, 127. Nelson, E., Fitzgerald, J. & Tefft, N. (2019). The distributional impact of a green payment policy for organic fruit. PLoS One, 14 (2). Nghiem, N., Jacobi, L., Ramfirez-Hassan, A., Waterlander, W. & Blakely, T. (2018). Thomas bayes goes to the virtual supermarket: Combining prior food price elasticities and experimental data in a large demand system of dietary choices. (Unpublished manuscript). O'Donoghue, T. & Rabin, M. (2006). Optimal sin taxes. Journal of Public Economics, 10-11. OECD. (2019). Oecd health statistics, 2019, (Tech. Rep.). Pendakur, K. (2009). Easi made easier. In D. Slottje (Ed.), Quantifying consumer preferences (contributions to economic analysis, vol. 288) (chap. 7). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. Program, G. F. R. (2019). Sugary drink taxes around the world (Tech.Rep.). Chapel Hill, NC: Global Food Research Program. Radner, D., Allen, R., Gonzalez, M., Jabine, T. & Muller, H. (1980). Report on exact and statistical matching techniques. Statistical Policy Working Paper 5. U.S. Department of of Commerce, O�ce of Federal Statistical Policy and Standards. Rubin, D. B. (1986). Statistical matching using �le concatenation with adjusted weights and multiple imputations. Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, 4 (1). Shonkwiler, J. S. & Yen, S. (1999). Two-step estimation of a censored system of equations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 81. WHO. (2015). Sugars intake for adults and children (Tech. Rep.). WHO. (2018). Saturated fatty acid and trans-fatty acid intake for adults and children (Tech. Rep.). Wilde, P., Huang, Y., Sy, S., Abrahams-Gessel, S., Jardim, T., Paarlberg, R. & et al. (2019). Cost-effectiveness of a us national sugar-sweetened beverage tax with a multistakeholder approach: who pays and who bene�ts. Am. J. Public Health, 109 (February 2), 276-284. Wooldridge, J. W. (2010). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data (second edition). The MIT Press. WorldBank. (2020). Taxes on sugar-sweetened beverages: International evidence and ex- periences. (Tech. Rep.). Wright, A., Smith, K., Hellowell, M. P., Griffith, R. & O'Connell, M. (2017). Policy lessons from health taxes: a systematic review of empirical studies. BMC Public Health, 583 (17). Xiang, D., Zhan, L. & Bordignon, M. (2018). A reconsideration of the sugar sweetened beverage tax in a household production model. Cesifo Working Papers, 7087 . Zhen, C., Finkelstein, E. A., Nonnemaker, J., Karns, S. & Todd, J. E. (2014). Predicting the effects of sugar-sweetened beverage taxes on food and beverage demand in a large demand system. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 96 (1). Zhen, C., Muth, M., Okrent, A., Karns, S., Brown, D. & Siegel, P. (2019). Do differences in reported expenditures between household scanner data and expenditure surveys matter in health policy research? Health Economics, 28 (6), 782-800. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/116214 |