How should place-based policies be designed to efficiently promote retail agglomeration?

Aizawa, Hiroki and Kono, Tatsuhito (2023): How should place-based policies be designed to efficiently promote retail agglomeration?

Abstract

Local governments have recently adopted place-based policies in order to revitalize decayed shopping areas in downtown areas. Developing a multipurpose shopping model, we evaluate the welfare impacts of place-based policies for downtown retail agglomeration. In the model, retail stores are under monopolistic competition, and consumers are free to choose where to reside. Results show that, whether or not place-based policies are efficient depends on the recipients of government subsidies, even if the policies promote retail agglomeration in downtown areas. Specifically, subsidizing consumers residing near downtown areas is inevitably harmful from the viewpoint of welfare, whereas subsidizing retail stores can be efficient.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Agglomeration; Monopolistic competition; Multipurpose shopping; Place-based policy.
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics; D - Microeconomics > D6 - Welfare Economics > D61 - Allocative Efficiency ; Cost-Benefit Analysis; I - Health, Education, and Welfare > I3 - Welfare, Well-Being, and Poverty > I38 - Government Policy ; Provision and Effects of Welfare Programs; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R52 - Land Use and Other Regulations

References

Allais, M., 1977. Theories of general economic equilibrium and maximum efficiency, in: Equilibrium and disequilibrium in economic theory. Springer, pp. 129–201. Arakawa, K., 2006. A model of shopping centers. Journal of Regional Science 46, 969–990. Arentze, T.A., Oppewal, H., Timmermans, H.J., 2005. A multipurpose shopping trip model to assess retail agglomeration effects. Journal of Marketing Research 42, 109– 115. Behrens, K., Kanemoto, Y., Murata, Y., 2015. The Henry George Theorem in a second-best world. Journal of Urban Economics 85, 34–51. Behrens, K., Mion, G., Murata, Y., Suedekum, J., 2020. Quantifying the gap between equilibrium and optimum under monopolistic competition. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 135, 2299–2360. Behrens, K., Murata, Y., 2007. General equilibrium models of monopolistic competition: a new approach. Journal of Economic Theory 136, 776–787. Boadway, R., Flatters, F., 1982. Efficiency and equalization payments in a federal system of government: a synthesis and extension of recent results. Canadian Journal of Economics , 613–633. Brueckner, J.K., 2007. Urban growth boundaries: An effective second-best remedy for unpriced traffic congestion? Journal of Housing Economics 16, 263–273. 39 Charlot, S., Gaign ́e, C., Robert-Nicoud, F., Thisse, J.F., 2006. Agglomeration and welfare: the core–periphery model in the light of bentham, kaldor, and rawls. Journal of Public Economics 90, 325–347. DellaVigna, S., Gentzkow, M., 2019. Uniform pricing in us retail chains. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 134, 2011–2084. Dhingra, S., Morrow, J., 2019. Monopolistic competition and optimum product diver- sity under firm heterogeneity. Journal of Political Economy 127, 196–232. Domon, S., Hirota, M., Kono, T., Managi, S., Matsuki, Y., 2022. The long-run effects of congestion tolls, carbon tax, and land use regulations on urban CO2 emissions. Regional Science and Urban Economics 92, 103750. Fujita, M., 1988. A monopolistic competition model of spatial agglomeration: Differentiated product approach. Regional science and urban economics 18, 87–124. Fujita, M., Thisse, J.F., 1986. Spatial competition with a land market: Hotelling and Von Thunen unified. The Review of Economic Studies 53, 819–841. Givord, P., Rathelot, R., Sillard, P., 2013. Place-based tax exemptions and displacement effects: An evaluation of the zones franches urbaines program. Regional Science and Urban Economics 43, 151–163. Harberger, A.C., 1971. Three basic postulates for applied welfare economics: an inter-pretive essay. Journal of Economic literature 9, 785–797. Henkel, J., Stahl, K., Walz, U., 2000. Coalition building in a spatial economy. Journal of Urban Economics 47, 136–163. Iwata, S., Kondo, K., 2021. The spillover effects of compact city policy on incumbent retailers: Evidence from Toyama city. RIETI Discussion Paper Series 21-E-085. 40 Kanemoto, Y., 2013a. Evaluating benefits of transportation in models of new economic geography. Economics of Transportation 2, 53–62. Kanemoto, Y., 2013b. Second-best cost–benefit analysis in monopolistic competition models of urban agglomeration. Journal of urban economics 76, 83–92. Kono, T., Kishi, A., 2018. What is an appropriate welfare measure for efficiency of local public policies inducing migration? Mathematical Social Sciences 91, 25–35. Kono, T., Morisugi, H., Miyahara, F., 2007. Congestion deterioration and transporta- tion project evaluation. The Annals of Regional Science 41, 145–170. Kono, T., Pines, D., Yokoi, T., 2019. Spatially-variable property tax and optimal tax composition in congested monocentric cities: George, Pigou, Ramsey and Strotz unified. Journal of Urban Economics 112, 122–132. Liu, H.L., Fujita, M., 1991. A monopolistic competition model of spatial agglomeration with variable density. The Annals of Regional Science 25, 81–99. Neumark, D., Simpson, H., 2015. Place-based policies, in: Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, pp. 1197–1287. O’Sullivan, A., 1993. Urban Economics. Richard, D. Irwin, Inc. Redding, S.J., Rossi-Hansberg, E., 2017. Quantitative spatial economics. Annual Review of Economics 9, 21–58. Tabuchi, T., 2009. Self-organizing marketplaces. Journal of Urban Economics 66, 179–185. Ushchev, P., Sloev, I., Thisse, J.F., 2015. Do we go shopping downtown or in the suburbs? Journal of Urban Economics 85, 1–15. 41 Wheaton, W.C., 1977. Residential decentralization, land rents, and the benefits of urban transportation investment. The American Economic Review 67, 138–143.