Bespalova, Olga Gennadyevna (2011): Renewable portfolio standards in the USA: experience and compliance with targets. Published in: K-State Electronic Theses, Dissertations, and Reports No. May 2011 (May 2011): pp. 1-48.

Bespalova, Olga Gennadyevna (2011): Bespalova, Olga Gennadyevna (2011): Renewable portfolio standards in the USA: experience and compliance with targets. Published in: K-State Electronic Theses, Dissertations, and Reports No. May 2011 (May 2011): pp. 1-48. Published in: K-State Electronic Theses, Dissertations, and Reports , Vol. May, No. 2011 (May 2011): pp. 1-48.

Abstract

Economic growth requires growth of energy consumption. In the second half of the twentieth century energy consumption began to outgrow its production and the United States. Consequently, we observe growing dependence of the U.S. economy on energy imports which is causing political and economic insecurity; increasing pollution and depletion of natural resources. One way to alleviate these problems is to encourage renewable electricity production. Because the electric power industry is the largest consumer of energy sources, including renewable energy, it has become one of the most frequent subjects of the regulatory policies and financial incentives aiming to stimulate renewable electricity production. One of the most promoted renewable energy policies in this industry is a renewable portfolio standard (RPS), which requires electric utilities and other retail electric providers to supply a specified amount of electricity sales from renewable energy sources. Currently 29 states and District of Columbia have the RPSs, while 7 states have goals; but only about two third of those with the RPS have certain targets to meet. To my best knowledge, there are no studies analyzing compliance with the RPSs targets or the role of penalty mechanism in the RPS design on meeting its goal. In this Master Thesis I estimate which states are in compliance with their individual RPSs goals and analyze which factors affect the probability of compliance, with the focus on the role of penalty size, and controlling for complimentary policies promoting renewable energy production. I use a fixed effects linear probability model and state level data. Results indicate that including a penalty in the RPS design significantly increases the probability that states will comply with their goals.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Renewable energy; renewable portfolio standards (RPS); RPS goals; electric power industry; renewable energy policy; policy compliance; penalty; econometric modeling; microeconometric; econometric modelling; panel data estimation; fixed effects; linear probability model.
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C13 - Estimation: General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation; L - Industrial Organization > L5 - Regulation and Industrial Policy > L52 - Industrial Policy ; Sectoral Planning Methods; L - Industrial Organization > L9 - Industry Studies: Transportation and Utilities > L94 - Electric Utilities; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q21 - Demand and Supply ; Prices; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q42 - Alternative Energy Sources; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q4 - Energy > Q48 - Government Policy; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q58 - Government Policy

References

Barnes, J., Haynes, R., Heiemann, A., Lim. B. & Vanega, A. (2009). IREC Updates and Trends. Accessed on 03/15/2011 <http://irecusa.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/10/IREC-2009-Annual-ReportFinal.pdf>

Bureau of Economic Analysis (2011). Accessed on 03/15/2011 <http://www.bea.gov/regional/gsp/>

Bird, L., Bolinger, M, Gagliano, T., Wiser R., Brown, M., & Parsons, B. (2005) “Policies and market factors driving wind power development in the United States”. Energy Policy, 22, 1397-1407.

California Energy Commission. Energy Almanac (2009). Accessed on 03/15/2011 <http://www.energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/total_system_power.html>

California Energy Commission. Energy Almanac (2008). Accessed on 03/15/2011 <http://www.energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/system_power/2008_total_system_power.html>

California Energy Commission. Energy Almanac (2007). Accessed on 03/15/2011 <http://www.energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/system_power/2007_total_system_power.html>

California Energy Commission. Energy Almanac (2006). Accessed on 03/15/2011 <http://www.energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/system_power/2006_total_system_power.html>

California Energy Commission. Energy Almanac (2005). Accessed on 03/15/2011 <http://www.energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/system_power/2005_gross_system_power.html>

California Energy Commission. Energy Almanac (2004). Accessed on 03/15/2011 <http://www.energyalmanac.ca.gov/electricity/system_power/2004_gross_system_power.html>

Carley, S. (2009) “State Renewable energy electricity policies: An empirical evaluation of effectiveness”. Energy Policy, 37, 3071-3081.

Chandler, J. (2009) “Trendy Solutions: Why do States adopt Sustainable Energy Portfolio Standards?” Energy Policy, 37, 3274-3281.

Cory, K.S. and Swezey, B.G. “Renewable Portfolio Standards in the States: Balancing Goals and Rules”. (2007). The Electricity Journal, 20 (4), 21-32. DSIRE (2011). Accessed on 04/15/2011 <http://www.dsireusa.org>

Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis (2011). Accessed on 03/15/2011 <http://research.stlouisfed.org/fred2/series/GDPDEF/downloaddata?cid=21>

Huang, M-Y., Janali, R.R. et ali. (2007). “Is the choice of Renewable Portfolio Standards Random?” Energy Policy, 35, 5571-5575.

League of Conservation Voters. (2010). Acessed on 03/15/2011. <http://www.lcv.org/>

Lyon, T. and Yin, H. (2010). “Why Do States Adopt Renewable Portfolio Standards? An Empirical Investigation”. Energy Journal, 31 (3), 133-57.

Michaels R.J. (2008)” A National Renewable Portfolio Standard: Politically Correct, Economically Suspect”. The Electricity Journal, 21 (3), 9-28.

NNEC. Freeing the Grid. Report No. 02-07. (2007). Accessed on 04/12/2011 <http://www.newenergychoices.org/uploads/FreeingTheGrid2007_report.pdf>

Swisher, J.N. & McAlpin, M.C. (2006) “Environmental impact of electricity deregulation”. Energy, 31, 1067-1083.

Rossi, J., “The Limits of a National Renewable Portfolio Standard”. (2010) Connecticut Law Review, 42 (5), p.1425-1450.

U.S. Census Bureau (2011) Accessed on 03/15/2011 <http://www.census.gov/popest/archives/2000s/vintage_2001/CO-EST2001-12/>

US EIA. Annual Energy Review (2009). Released on 08/19/2010. Accessed on 12/02/2010. <http://www.eia.doe.gov/aer/pdf/pages/sec1_5.pdf> <http://www.eia.doe.gov/emeu/aer/pecss_diagram.html>

US EIA. Energy in Brief. (2010) “How much of our electricity is generated from renewable sources?” Last updated on 09/01/2010. Accessed on 03/05/2011. <http://www.eia.doe.gov/energy_in_brief/renewable_energy.cfm>

US EIA. Historical Tables (2011). Accessed on 03/15/2011. <http://www.eia.doe.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/generation_state.xls > <http://www.eia.doe.gov/oiaf/1605/ggrpt/excel/tbl_statetotal.xls> <http://www.eia.gov/cneaf/electricity/epa/average_price_state.xls>

US EIA. International Energy Statistics (2008). Accessed on 05/03/2011. <http://tonto.eia.doe.gov/cfapps/ipdbproject/iedindex3.cfm?tid=90&pid=44&aid=8&cid=regions&syid=1980&eyid=2008&unit=MMTCD>

Yin, H. and Powers, N. “Do state renewable portfolio standards promote in-state renewable generation?” (2010) Energy Policy, 38 (5), p.1140-1149.