Bachev, Hrabrin (2023): Оценка на институционалната структура на оползотворяване на утайки от ПСОВ в българското земеделие.
Preview |
PDF
Bachev-Institutions of sludge utilization in Bulgaria.pdf Download (516kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The process of transforming sewage sludge from "waste into good (product)" is conditioned by various social, economic, technological, agronomic, personal, etc. factors. An important place in this complex of factors is taken by the institutional structure in which the various agents related to the process carry out their activities and relationships. Institutional environment and institutions of governance provide opportunities and set constraints for agents, structure and determine their behavior and activity, and ultimately (pre)determine the effectiveness of agro-eco-governance as a whole, and the effectiveness and the degree of use of sludge in agriculture in particular. In this paper, the interdisciplinary methodology of the New Institutional Economy is adapted and an analysis and evaluation of the institutional structure of the use of sludge in Bulgarian agriculture is made.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Оценка на институционалната структура на оползотворяване на утайки от ПСОВ в българското земеделие |
English Title: | Assessment of the institutional structure of sludge utilization in Bulgarian agriculture |
Language: | Bulgarian |
Keywords: | sludge, utilization, agriculture, institutions, governance, Bulgaria |
Subjects: | Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q11 - Aggregate Supply and Demand Analysis ; Prices Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q12 - Micro Analysis of Farm Firms, Farm Households, and Farm Input Markets Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q13 - Agricultural Markets and Marketing ; Cooperatives ; Agribusiness Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q15 - Land Ownership and Tenure ; Land Reform ; Land Use ; Irrigation ; Agriculture and Environment Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture > Q18 - Agricultural Policy ; Food Policy Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q24 - Land Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q25 - Water Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q28 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 118309 |
Depositing User: | Hrabrin Bachev |
Date Deposited: | 24 Aug 2023 16:02 |
Last Modified: | 24 Aug 2023 16:03 |
References: | Башев Х. (2020): ДЕФИНИРАНЕ, АНАЛИЗИРАНЕ И УСЪВЪРШЕНСТВАНЕ НА УПРАВЛЕНИЕТО НА УСЛУГИТЕ НА АГРО-ЕКОСИТЕМИТЕ, Икономическа мисъл, бр. 4, 3-30. Башев Х. И Б.Иванов (2021): Превръщането на утайките от пречистването на отпадъчни води в продукт и оползотворяването им в селското стопанство, Земеделие плюс, бр. 299 (част 1) и бр. 300 (част 2). Башев Х. и Б.Иванов (2022): Фактори за оползотворяване на утайки от пречистването на отпадъчни води в селското стопанство на България, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, No 2, 43-62. Башев Х. (2023): Подход за дефиниране и анализиране на аграрното управление (governance), Икономически и социални алтернативи, 3 (в процес на публикация). Башев Х., Б. Иванов, Д. Митова, И. Боевски, П. Маринов, А. Саров, Д. Цвяткова, К. Костенаров, Д. Ванев (2021): МЕХАНИЗМИ И ФОРМИ НА УПРАВЛЕНИЕ НА АГРОЕКОСИСТЕМНИТЕ УСЛУГИ В БЪЛГАРИЯ, ИАИ, София. ИАИ (2021): Възможности от оползотворяването на утайки, получени при пречистване на отпадъчни води и ефект за устойчиво земеделие, отчет на научно-приложен проект, ИАИ. Иванов Б., С. Маринова, Х. Башев, В. Георгиева (2020): Икономически и екологични ефекти от използване на утайките в земеделието, Екологично инженерство и опазване на околната среда, 3, 44-53. Маринова С. (2008): Утайки от пречиствателни станции за отпадъчни води и правила за тяхното оползотворяване, София. Сяров А. (2020): Социално-икономически, екологични и управленчески аспекти при оползотворяването на утайки в земеделието, получени при пречистване на отпадъчни води, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 1, 58-69. Директива 86/278/ЕИО (1986): Директива 86/278/ ЕИО на Съвета от 12 юни 1986 година за опазване на околната среда, и по-специално на почвата, при използване на утайки от отпадъчни води в земеделието, ЕС. Наредба (2017): Наредба за реда и начина за оползотворяване на утайки от пречистването на отпадъчни води чрез употребата им в земеделието (приета с ПМС № 201 от 04.08.2016г., Обн. ДВ. бр.63 от 12 Август 2016 г., изм. ДВ. бр.55 от 7 Юли 2017 г.). НСПУУ (2014): Национален стратегически план за управление на утайки от пречиствателните станции за отпадъчни води в България за периода 2014- 2020г., Министерство на околната среда и водите, София. ИАОС (2004-2021): ДОКЛАДИ ОТ ИЗПЪЛНИТЕЛНА АГЕНЦИЯ ПО ОКОЛНА СРЕДА СЪГЛАСНО ЧЛ. 16, АЛ. 1 ОТ НАРЕДБА ЗА РЕДА И НАЧИНА ЗА ОПОЛЗОТВОРЯВАНЕ НА УТАЙКИ ОТ ПРЕЧИСТВАНЕТО НА ОТПАДЪЧНИ ВОДИ ЧРЕЗ УПОТРЕБАТА ИМ В ЗЕМЕДЕЛИЕТО, ИАОС, София. ANSES (2020): Sewage sludge produced during the COVID-19 epidemic can only be applied to fields after disinfection, The French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety, 02/04/2020. Bachev H. (2023): Agrarian Governance – Who, What, Why, How, Where, When, Price, Level?, Theoretical and Practical Research in Economic Fields, Vol. XIV, Issue 1(27), 105-125. Bachev H. (2023): What is Agrarian Governance?, in A. Tavidze (Editor) Progress in Economics Research, Vol. 51, Nova Science Publisher, New York. Bachev H., B.Ivanov and A.Sarov (2020): Unpacking Governance Sustainability of Bulgarian Agriculture, Икономически изследвания, 6, 106-137. Bachev H., B.Ivanov (2021): A study on wastewater treatment sludge utilization in Bulgarian agriculture, Technology audit and production reserves, 5 (4 (61), 35-44. Bachev H., B.Ivanov (2021): Identification of Factors for Agricultural Use of Sludge from Wastewater Treatment in Bulgaria, The IUP Journal of Supply Chain Management, vol.18, No 3, 48-71. Bachev H., B.Ivanov (2021): Efficiency and Factors for Agricultural Use of Sludge in Circular Bulgarian Economy, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, Volume XVI, Issue 3(73), 280-301. Bachev H., B.Ivanov (2021): AGRICULTURAL SLUDGE UTILIZATION IN BULGARIAN CIRCULAR ECONOMY, in Progress in Economics Research. Volume 48, Albert Tavidze (Editor), Nova Science, 53-86. Bachev H. and B. Ivanov (2022): Transforming Sludge from a Waste into Product in Circular Economy of Bulgarian Agriculture, Economía Coyuntural, vol.7 no.2, http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?pid=S2415-06222022000200117&script=sci_arttext&tlng=en Bachev H. and B. Ivanov (2022): Factors for inclusion of wastewater treatment sludge in agri-food chain in Bulgaria, Journal of Economics Library, Vol.8, No 3, 107-129. Ivanov B. and H. Bachev (2021): Convergent analysis of waste water practices among EU countries, Bulgarian Journal of Agricultural Science, 27, 2, 289–296. EC (2008): Environmental, economic and social impacts of the use of sewage sludge on land, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/waste/sludge/pdf/part_i_report.pdf Ekane N., K. Barquet1 and A. Rosemarin (2021): Resources and Risks: Perceptions on the Application of Sewage Sludge on Agricultural Land in Sweden, a Case Study, Front. Sustain. Food Syst., 19 April 2021. EU (2021): Roundtable discussion on sludge use, https://ec.europa.eu/environment/archives/waste/sludge/pdf/workshoppart5.pdf Furubotn E., R. Richter (2005). Institutions and Economic Theory: The Contribution of the New Institutional Economics, Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan Press. EurEau (2021): Wate water treatment –sludge management. Eur Eau. Hudcová H., J. Vymazal, Miloš Rozkošný (2019): Present restrictions of sewage sludge application in agriculture within the European Union, Soil and Water Research, 14, (2): 104–120. Iticescu C., P. Georgescu, M. Arseni, A. Rosu, M.Timofti, G.Carp, L.Cioca (2021): Optimal Solutions for the Use of Sewage Sludge on Agricultural Lands. Water, 13, 585. North D. (1991): Institutions, Journal of Economic Perspectives, Vol. 5, 1, 97–112. Rosiek K. (2020): Directions and Challenges in the Management of Municipal Sewage Sludge in Poland in the Context of the Circular Economy, Sustainability, 12, 3686. Rosemarin A., B. Macura, J. Carolus, K. Barquet, F.Ek, L.Järnberg, D. Lorick, S. Johannesdottir, S.Pedersen, J.Koskiaho, N.Haddaway, T.Okruszko (2020): Circular nutrient solutions for agriculture and wastewater – a review of technologies and practices, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 45,78-91. The European Green Deal (2019): COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE EUROPEAN COUNCIL, THE COUNCIL, THEEUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS, European Commission, 11.12.2019. Scozzari A., B El Mansouri (2011): Water Security in the Mediterranean Region, An International Evaluation of Management, Control, and Governance Approaches, Springer Science+Business Media B.V. Tesfamariam E., Z.Ogbazghi, J.Annandale, Y. Gebrehiwot (2020): Cost–Benefit Analysis of Municipal Sludge as a Low-Grade Nutrient Source: A Case Study from South Africa, Sustainability, 12, 9950. Taşeli B. (2020): Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Sewage Sludge (Biosolid) Management Options, Intech, https://www.intechopen.com/chapters/71033 Usman K., S. Khan, S. Ghulam, M. Umar, N. Khan, S.Khalil (2012): Sewage Sludge: An Important Biological Resource for Sustainable Agriculture and Its Environmental Implications, American Journal of Plant Sciences, 2012, 3, 1708-1721. Williamson, O., 2005. The Economics of Governance. American Economic Review, 95(2), 1-18. Bachev H. (2017): Sustainability of Bulgarian farming enterprises during European Union common agricultural policy implementation, Journal of Applied Economic Sciences (JAES) 12 (48), 422-425. Bachev H. (2000): Bulgarian Experience in Transformation of Farm Structures, Farm Management and Rural Planning, 181-196. Bachev H. (2011): Water governance in Bulgarian agriculture, in Climate Change and its Effects on Water Resources, Springer, 215-224. Bachev H., M Tsuji (2001): Governing of Agrarian Transactions, Management and Rural Planning II, Kyushu University, Fukuoka, 185-202. Bachev H., F Ito (2014): Implications of Fukushima Nuclear Disaster for Japanese Agri-food Chains, International Journal of Food and Agricultural Economics 2 (1), 95-120. Bachev H. (2002): Study on land supply in Bulgarian farms, Farm Management and Rural Planning 3, 189-203. Bachev H. (2014): Environmental management in agriculture, Икономическа мисъл, 1, 56-79. Bachev H. (2012): Governing of Agro-Ecosystem Services in Bulgaria, Research Topics in Agricultural and Applied Economics 3, 94-129. Bachev H., M Kagatsume (2002): Governing of Financial Supply in Bulgarian Farms, The Natural Resource Economics Review, 8, 131-150. Башев Х (2014): Екоуправление в селското стопанство, Икономическа мисъл, 1, 29-55 Башев Х (2006): Оценка на устойчивостта на българските ферми, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 3, 18-28. Башев Х (2006): Управление на аграрната и селска устойчивост, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 4, 27-37 . Хаджиева В, Д Митова, М Анастасова, Х Башев, В Мицов (2005): Планиране на устойчивото развитие на земеделското стопанство, Икономика и управление на селското стопанство, 5, 37-43. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/118309 |