Medel-Ramírez, Carlos and Medel-López, Hilario and Lara-Mérida, Jennifer (2023): Digital Governance in the 21stCentury: The LiTCoDE Framework for Transparency, Leadership, and Technological Evolution A Comparative Study of Mexico and Vietnam.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_118706.pdf Download (5MB) | Preview |
Abstract
In today's fast-paced digital landscape, the spotlight is on the pursuit of transparent governance as a critical facet of global public administration. As we immerse ourselves in the digital era, brimming with endless opportunities, it becomes essential to reflect on the convergence of governance, clarity, and technological innovation. By exploring the journeys of Mexico and Vietnam, nations with diverse backgrounds and administrative paradigms, we present the LiTCoDE Framework. This model offers a fresh perspective on addressing transparency challenges of the modern age.
The LiTCoDE Framework, symbolizing Leadership, Transformative Public Management, Collaboration, and Digital Evolution, stands out as a guidepost for nations aiming to amalgamate technology with their governance strategies, ultimately nurturing a transparent ethos. This approach posits that while digital tools play a pivotal role, genuine transparent governance stems from a leadership dedicated to openness, an ethos of teamwork, and a relentless drive for public management renewal.
Although Mexico and Vietnam differ in terms of geography and cultural backdrop, they converge in their goals: to bolster their administrative frameworks amidst digital metamorphosis and champion transparency as a core value. Their tales, marked by both hurdles and achievements, offer an insightful comparative analysis. This exploration dives deep into the intricacies of policy execution, leadership dynamics, and the catalytic impact of united endeavors in both countries. Yet, every path of transformation is dotted with challenges. The digital revolution, despite its promise of vast knowledge accessibility, brings with it substantial barriers. From the looming shadows of fake news and security breaches to the task of guaranteeing universal tech access, the journey towards transparency remains intricate. Herein lies the essence of our discourse: to unearth the challenges, unravel the strategies adopted by Mexico and Vietnam, and thereby forge a roadmap that other nations might emulate.
In dissecting the experiences of these two nations, we don't merely present a comparative study but a tapestry woven from threads of trials, tribulations, and triumphs. Through the lens of the LiTCoDE Framework, we aim to glean actionable insights that transcend borders, offering a blueprint for nations worldwide. The objective isn't just academic elucidation but the fostering of an international collaborative spirit, an ethos of shared learning, and mutual growth.
The narrative of transparency in the digital age is a tale of endless possibilities, punctuated by challenges but illuminated by the beacon of hope that frameworks like LiTCoDE represent. Through a meticulous exploration of Mexico and Vietnam's experiences, this presentation aspires to light the path for nations and leaders, reaffirming the belief that in the confluence of leadership, technology, and collaboration, lies the promise of a transparent and accountable future.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Digital Governance in the 21stCentury: The LiTCoDE Framework for Transparency, Leadership, and Technological Evolution A Comparative Study of Mexico and Vietnam |
English Title: | Digital Governance in the 21stCentury: The LiTCoDE Framework for Transparency, Leadership, and Technological Evolution A Comparative Study of Mexico and Vietnam |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Transparent Governance Digital Era LiTCoDE Framework Leadership Dynamics Comparative Analysis |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C00 - General H - Public Economics > H0 - General > H00 - General O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O33 - Technological Change: Choices and Consequences ; Diffusion Processes O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O35 - Social Innovation |
Item ID: | 118706 |
Depositing User: | Carlos Medel-Ramírez |
Date Deposited: | 18 Mar 2024 08:10 |
Last Modified: | 18 Mar 2024 08:10 |
References: | Acevedo-Alonso, J. A.,& Ariza-Buenaventura, E. D. (2021). Rendición de cuentas y transparencia en Latinoamérica: un análisis crítico a partir del estudio de caso del sector público de generación de energía eléctrica colombiano entre 2010 y 2016. Innovar, 31(82), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.15446/innovar. v31n82.98423 Aisdl (2020). Current Situation of Corruption Offenses and Measures for Improvement of AntiCorruption Effectiveness in Vietnam’s Economy. Advances in Economics, Business and Management Research, volume 156. 2nd International Scientific and Practical Conference on Digital Economy (ISCDE 2020) https://www.atlantispress.com/proceedings/iscde20/125947826 An, N.P., Viet, L., & Huy, P.Q. (2021). Applying a New Public Management Model to Public Sector Management Accounting in Vietnam. Proceedings of the International Conference on Emerging Challenges: Business Transformation and Circular Economy (ICECH 2021). https://www.atlantispress.com/proceedings/icech21/125965440 Asenjo Alarcón, J.A. (2022). Implicancias de la era digital en la generación Z. Vol. 5 Núm. 1 (2022): Revista Científica Curae. 60–74. Doi: 10.26495/curae.v5i1.2202 Beckers L. (2021). Transparency and standardization in using digital patient reported outcome measures (PROMs). Journal of back and musculoskeletal rehabilitation, 34(4), 497–498. https://doi.org/10.3233/BMR215003 Brivio Ramirez, A. J., & Brivio, . A. M. (2021). Filosofía de la educación en la era digital. Alpha Centauri, 2(2), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.47422/ac.v2i2.35 Chettri, S.K., Debnath, D., & Devi, P. (2020). Leveraging Digital Tools and Technologies to Alleviate COVID19 Pandemic. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3626092 Chimaobi O., Okon B.B., Udoh E., Eme E.O. (2023), Leadership and the Success of African Integration and Development Agenda: Juxtaposing the African Continental Free Trade Area - AFCFTA and Agenda 2063. African Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities Research 6(2), 190-206. DOI: 10.52589/AJSSHRQBOEBIGD Clark, S. (2022). Including Digital Connection in the United Nations Sustainable Development Goals: A Systems Thinking Approach for Achieving the SDGs. Sustainability, 14. Coddou Mc Manus, A., & Smart Larraín, S. (2021). La transparencia y la no discriminación en el Estado de bienestar digital. Revista Chilena de Derecho y Tecnología. Vol. 10 Núm. 2 (2021): Segundo semestre 2021 https://rchdt.uchile.cl/index.php/RCHDT/article/view/61034 Fera Yolanda, Sigid Eko Pramono, Muhammad Hasbi Zaenal (2020) Effect of Internal Control, Information Technology and Audit on Good Amil Governance Practices: Evidence from BAZNAS Kalimantan, Indonesia. García Saisó, S., Marti, M. C., Mejía Medina, F., Pascha, V. M., Nelson, J., Tejerina, L., Bagolle, A., & D'Agostino, M. (2022). Digital transformation for more equitable and sustainable public health in the age of digital interdependence.. Pan American journal of public health, 46, e1. Doi 10.26633/RPSP.2022.1 Gill, A. S., & Germann, S. (2022). Conceptual and normative approaches to AI governance for a global digital ecosystem supportive of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). AI and ethics, 2(2), 293–301. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43681-021-00058-z Govada Sujata (2020) Smart and Sustainable City Framework with Smart Cultural Precinct as Case Study. Urbanie & Urbanus. https://uandujournal.com/abstract.php?id=33 Government of Mexico. (2021). AGREEMENT issuing the National Digital Strategy 20212024. Official Journal of the Federation. September 6, 2021. Retrieved from: https://dof.gob.mx/nota_detalle.php?codigo=5628886&fecha=06/09/2021#gsc.tab=0 Grec, M.C. (2021). Políticas públicas sobre transparencia, participación ciudadana y colaboración en el desarrollo de una plataforma de Estado Abierto en la Ciudad de Mendoza. Millcayac - Revista Digital de Ciencias Sociales. MILLCAYAC - Revista Digital de Ciencias Sociales / Vol. VIII / N° 15 / septiembre 2021 - febrero 2022. ISSN 2362-616x. (pp. 85-116). Guertler, M.R., Adams, N., Caldwell, G., Donovan, J., Hopf, A., & Roberts, J. (2022). A LifeCycle Framework to Manage Collaboration and Knowledge Exchange in Open Organisations. Proceedings of the Design Society, 2, 181 190. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/proceedingsofthedesignsociety/article/lifecycleframeworktomanagecollaborationandknowledgeexchangeinopenorganisations/F36CE4AC1160840D39E911134A78525E Hogan, M. et al. (2017). Governance, Transparency and the Collaborative Design of Open Data Collaboration Platforms: Understanding Barriers, Options, and Needs. In: Ojo, A., Millard, J. (eds) Government 3.0 – Next Generation Government Technology Infrastructure and Services. Public Administration and Information Technology, vol 32. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-63743-3_12 Home Arias, P. ., & Arévalo, J. C. (2021). La transparencia y la rendición de cuentas mecanismos del “gobierno abierto” como instrumento de compromiso público y responsabilidad democrática en las organizaciones públicas. Documentos De Trabajo ECACEN, 1. https://doi.org/10.22490/ECACEN.4693 Human Rights Watch (2023). Vietnam: Free AntiCorruption Campaigner. June 5 2023. https://www.hrw.org/news/2023/06/05/vietnamfreeanticorruptioncampaigner Huy, D.T., Linh, T.N., Dung, N.T., Thuy, P.T., Thanh, T.V., & Hoàng, N.T. (2021). Investment attraction for digital economy, digital technology sector in digital transformation era from ODA investment and comparison to FDI investment in Vietnam. Laplage EM Revista. vol.7, n. 3A, Sept. Dec. 2021, p.427 439. Jaqua, E.E., & Jaqua, T. (2021). Visionary . leadership. Quantum Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities. Vol. 2 No. 6 (2021): QJSSH. https://www.qjssh.com/index.php/qjssh/article/view/109 Kaihlanen, A. M., Virtanen, L., Buchert, U., Safarov, N., Valkonen, P., Hietapakka, L., Hörhammer, I., Kujala, S., Kouvonen, A., & Heponiemi, T. (2022). Towards digital health equity - a qualitative study of the challenges experienced by vulnerable groups in using digital health services in the COVID-19 era. BMC health services research, 22(1), 188. Doi 10.1186/s12913-022-07584-4 Kanaev, E.А. (2022). Asean-Russia cooperation: The digital dimension. Southeast Asia: Actual Problems of Development. Khanh, N.T., Phuong, T.V., & Do, T. (2021). The Influences of Technology on Digital Economy Development in Vietnam. Int. J. Softw. Innov., 9, 1018. https://www.igiglobal.com/gateway/article/289166 Kumar, M.S., Gupta, D.A., & Gaurav, D.R. (2023). Exploring Corporate Governance Practices in the Indian Context: Opportunities and Challenges. Le Hong Hiep (2019) The Impact of Vietnam’s Anticorruption Campaign on the Real Estate Sector. Researchers at Iseas – Yusof Ishak Institute Analyse Current Events. May 31 2019. Issue: 2019 No. 46. https://www.iseas.edu.sg/images/pdf/ISEAS_Perspective_2019_46.pdf Lo, V.I. (2023). Legal Reform in China: Technology, Transparency, and Enculturation. Law, Technology and Humans. López Villafañe, V. (2021). El fin de la época neoliberal en México y el proyecto transformador del nuevo gobierno de Andrés Manuel López Obrador. Observatorio del Desarrollo. Investigación, Reflexión y Análisis. Maira Martini (2012) Overview of corruption and anticorruption in Vietnam. Transparency International, https://www.u4.no/publications/overviewofcorruptionandanticorruptioninvietnam Max Cesar, Chaia Alberto, de Oliveira Vaz Andre, GarciaMuñoz Gonzalo, Haugwitz Philipp (2018). How Mexico can become Latin America’s digitalgovernment powerhouse. McKinsey & Company. November 18, 2018. https://www.mckinsey.com/mx/ourinsights/howmexicocanbecomelatinamericasdigitalgovernmentpowerhouse#/ McLuhan Marshall (1994) Understanding Media The extensions of man. The MIT Press. Merritt, H. (2016). The evolving role of public policy in promoting information technologies: The case of Mexico. 2016 Portland International Conference on Management of Engineering and Technology (PICMET), 206214. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stamp/stamp.jsp?tp=&arnumber=7806754&tag=1 Nguyen, T.Q., Viet, H.T., & Loan, L.T. (2021). Factors affecting financial management: Case study of educational manager training and fostering public institutions. Management Science Letters. doi: 10.5267/j.msl.2021.1.016 OECD (2016), Open Government Data Review of Mexico: Data Reuse for Public Sector Impact and Innovation, OECD Digital Government Studies, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/9789264259270-en OECD (2020), "The OECD Digital Government Policy Framework: Six dimensions of a Digital Government", OECD Public Governance Policy Papers, No. 02, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/f64fed2aen ÓhÉigeartaigh, S.S., Whittlestone, J., Liu, Y., Zeng, Y., & Liu, Z. (2020). Overcoming Barriers to Cross-cultural Cooperation in AI Ethics and Governance. Philosophy & Technology, 1-23. Oxford Analytica (2018), "Prospects for Mexico in 2019", Expert Briefings.https://doi.org/10.1108/OXANDB240173 Oxford Analytica (2019), "Concerns over AMLO’s plans will only grow in Mexico", Expert Briefings.https://doi.org/10.1108/OXANDB245509 Oxford Analytica (2019), "Mexico’s domestic policies jeopardise economic growth", Expert Briefings. https://doi.org/10.1108/OXANDB244329 Oxford Analytica (2019), "Pemex downgrades hit AMLO’s economic vision for Mexico", Expert Briefings. https://doi.org/10.1108/OXANDB244443 Oxford Analytica (2019), "Pemex downgrades hit AMLO’s economic vision for Mexico", Expert Briefings. https://doi.org/10.1108/OXANDB244443 Oxford Analytica (2021), "Mexico's anticorruption measures remain ineffective", Expert Briefings. https://doi.org/10.1108/OXANDB265408 Pérez, J.E. (2018). La información pública de oficio de los institutos electorales en México y la reforma político electoral y de transparencia. Pham Thi Thuy Duong & Truong Thuy Quynh (2023). Unveiling the engines behind egovernment in Vietnam. East Asia ForumEconomics, Politics and Public Policy in East Asia and the Pacific. July – September 2023. https://www.eastasiaforum.org/2023/04/15/unveilingtheenginesbehindegovernmentinvietnam/ RuvalcabaGomez, E.A., & Cifuentes‐Faura, J. (2023). Analysis of the perception of digital government and artificial intelligence in the public sector in Jalisco, Mexico. International Review of Administrative Sciences. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00208523231164587 SánchezTalanquer, M., & Greene, K.F. (2021). Is Mexico Falling into the Authoritarian Trap? Journal of Democracy, 32, 56 71. https://muse.jhu.edu/article/815937 Shen, Y., Cheng, Y., & Yu, J. (2022). From recovery resilience to transformative resilience: How digital platforms reshape public service provision during and post COVID-19. Public Management Review, 25, 710 - 733. Thai, L. Q. (2022). Legal issues on land corruption in Vietnam. Cogito, 14(1), 91114. Retrieved from https://www.proquest.com/scholarlyjournals/legalissuesonlandcorruptionvietnam/docview/2647725571/se2 Torres, M.B., & Mancillas, V.S. (2020). Innovación gubernamental y transparencia: aproximación crítica a cuatro casos en Sonora, México. U.S. Department of Commerce. International Trade Administration (2022). Mexico – Country Commercial Guide. Internet and Digital Economy. https://www.trade.gov/countrycommercialguides/mexicointernetanddigitaleconomy Ulnicane, I., Eke, D.O., Knight, W., Ogoh, G., & Stahl, B.C. (2021). Good governance as a response to discontents? Déjà vu, or lessons for AI from other emerging technologies. Interdisciplinary Science Reviews, 46, 71 - 93. UNTAD (2022). Public payment systems in the digital era: Responding to the financial stability and security-related risks of cryptocurrencies. Xiao, M. (2023). Research on Strategies for Improving the Governance Efficiency of International Cooperative Education. International Journal of Engineering Technologies and Management Research, 10(4), 41-53. doi: 10.29121/ijetmr.v10.i4.2023.1322 Xu, J., She, S., & Liu, W. (2022). Role of digitalization in environment, social and governance, and sustainability: Review-based study for implications. Frontiers in psychology, 13, 961057. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.961057 Zapata, E., Stirling, R., Pasquarelli, W., & Shearer, E. (2020). The GovTech Index 2020 Unlocking the Potential of GovTech Ecosystems in Latin America, Spain and Portugal. Caracas: CAF, Oxford Insights. https://scioteca.caf.com/handle/123456789/1580 Zhang, C. (2022). Research on New Public Management from a Multidimensional Perspectiv. Frontiers in Business, Economics and Management. ISSN: 2766824X Vol. 3, No. 1, 2022 |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/118706 |