zhdanov, dmitry (2022): Человеческий капитал предприятия: модель компетенций работника в цифровом мире. Published in: π-Economy , Vol. T 15, No. no. 5 (2022): pp. 58-74.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_119368.pdf Download (649kB) | Preview |
Abstract
Digital transformation of Russian enterprises is one of the priority national tasks, and although the sanctions adopted in 2022 slowed it down, they did not reduce its relevance. The active use of digital solutions, virtual space, the emergence of a new environment for the interaction of economic entities require the availability of relevant knowledge and skills, affect the requirements for human capital (HC) of enterprises, and form an active demand for the relevant competencies of employees. In this regard, the purpose of this study was to determine the model of competencies required by employees of manufacturing companies in the context of digitalization, as well as to establish the priority components of the HC of a digital enterprise. The methodological basis of the work is a systemic economic theory, which makes it possible to match the individual systems of an enterprise (its areas of activity) with the corresponding (demanded) components of an individual and corporate human capital. The study initially analyzed the main results of the digital transformation of industrial enterprises. It is noted that the most important consequences are the change in the business processes of companies, the forms of organization of their activities, the emergence of new models of interaction in the business environment. Next, a comparison was made of various models of competencies of enterprise employees in the context of digitalization, which made it possible to coordinate requests for their composition and highlight the key positions that should be present in such a model. They are broadly defined as: a) the ability to develop and apply software, to understand the principles of operation of digital systems; b) the ability to use interpersonal skills, provide the necessary creativity and purposefulness of actions. The performed analysis made it possible to establish a set of elements (competencies) that form the human capital of an employee of an enterprise operating in the digital economy, as well as to determine the composition of the corporate human capital model of such an enterprise, which became the main scientific result of the work. In conclusion, the elements of the generated models were ranked, which is also a novelty of the work. It is shown that, first of all, the role of socio-psychological, organizational¸ intellectual and creative competencies of the employee’s human capital will increase, as well as such components of the corporate human capital as: production capital, relationship capital and structural (organizational) capital.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Человеческий капитал предприятия: модель компетенций работника в цифровом мире |
English Title: | Human capital of an enterprise: a model of employee competencies in the digital world |
Language: | Russian |
Keywords: | digital economy, systems economic theory, company, competency model |
Subjects: | A - General Economics and Teaching > A2 - Economic Education and Teaching of Economics > A23 - Graduate J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J8 - Labor Standards: National and International > J80 - General |
Item ID: | 119368 |
Depositing User: | Mr. dmitry zhdanov |
Date Deposited: | 11 Dec 2023 16:08 |
Last Modified: | 11 Dec 2023 16:08 |
References: | 1. BCG. Russia 2025: from personnel to talents. 2017. URL: https://d-russia.ru/wp-content/uploads/2017/11/Skills_Outline_web_tcm26-175469.pdf (accessed April 09, 2022). (rus). 2. Zhdanov D.A. Human capital of an enterprise in the context of a systemic economy. Economics of Contemporary Russia, 2020. no. 4(91), p. 24-38. DOI: 10.33293/1609-1442-2020-4(91)-25-38 (rus). 3. Kleiner G.B. System management and system optimization of the enterprise. Modern competition, 2018. no. 12(67), p. 104–113. (rus). 4. Kleiner G.B. System economics: development steps. M.: Publishing House "Scientific Library", 2021. 746 p. (rus). 5. Komarova ZH. Human capital - the main factor in increasing competitiveness. Science and innovations, 2018. No. 1, p. 4-9 (rus). 6. Krakovskaya I. N. Measurement and evaluation of the human capital of an organization: approaches and problems. Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 2008. No. 9(124), p. 41–50 (rus.). 7. KPMG. A new look at IT development. Results of the 2019 CIO survey conducted by HARVEY NASH and KPMG. URL: https://assets.kpmg/content/dam/kpmg/kz/pdf/2019/09/CIO-survey_2019_RU.pdf (accessed May April 09, 2022). (rus). 8. Magradze A.G. Human Capital as an Element of Intellectual Capital: Existing Indices and Methods of Its Measurement and Influence on the Capitalization of Domestic Companies. Fundamental Research. 2019. No. 12-1. With. 224-232. (rus). 9. The competency model of the digital transformation team in the system of public administration. ed. Shklyaruk M.S., Garkushi N.S. M.: RANEPA, 2020. 84 p. URL: https://hr.cdto.ranepa.ru/model-kompetencij-komandy-cifrovoj-transformacii. (accessed April 09, 2022). (rus). 10. Milner B. Z. (ed.). Innovative development: housekeepers. Intellectual resources, knowledge management. Moscow: INFRA-M. 2010 (rus). 11. NRU HSE. What is the digital economy? Trends, competencies, measurement: report. Moscow, 2019. M.: Izd. house of the Higher School of Economics, 2019. URL: https://conf.hse.ru/mirror/pubs/share/262126147 (accessed April 09, 2022). (rus). 12. NRU HSE. Trends in the development of the Internet: the readiness of the economy and society to function in a digital environment: an analytical report. G.I. Abdrakhmanova, M.D. Vanyushina, K.O. Vishnevsky, L.M. Gohberg and others; M.: NRU HSE, 2021a. 248 p. URL: https://cctld.ru/upload/iblock/1f2/tendencies-2021.pdf (accessed April 09, 2022). (rus). 13. NRU HSE. Indicators of the Digital Economy: 2021: Statistical Collection. Abdrakhmanova G.I., Vishnevsky K.O., Gohberg L.M. and others; M.: NRU HSE, 2021b. 380 p. URL: https://e-cis.info/upload/iblock/d09/d0947995b4503f20317df7663b3059b6.pdf (accessed April 09, 2022). (rus). 14. Remote work in Russian: pros and cons. Data from the all-Russian poll "VTsIOM-Sputnik". Analytical review No. 4436. 02/16/2021. URL: https://old.wciom.ru/index.php?id=236&uid=10706 (accessed April 09, 2022). (rus). 15. Ulyanov N. The manufacturing industry was given a direction. Expert. 2021. no. 47 (1230). (rus). 16. Shestakova I.G. Human Capital in the Digital Age. NRU ITMO Scientific Journal. Series Economics and Environmental Management No. 1, 2018. DOI: 10.17586/2310-1172-2018-11-1-56-63 (rus). 17. Becker G. S. The Age of Human Capital. 2002. Available at: URL: http://media.hoover.org/sites/default/fles/ documents/0817928928_3.pdf 18. Bughin J., Hazan E., Lund S., Dahlström P., Wiesinger A., Subramaniam A. Skill shift: Automation and the future of the workforce. McKinsey Global Institute. 2018. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/future-of-work/skill-shift-automation-and-the-future-of-the-workforce (accessed April 09, 2022). 19. Fueling Growth Through Data Monetization. McKinsey & Company, December 2017. 9 p. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/business-functions/mckinsey-analytics/our-insights/fueling-growth-through-data-monetization (accessed April 09, 2022). 20. Gartner. 4 Steps to Develop Digital Dexterity in Your Workplace. 2018. 21. Gratton, L., Ghoshal, S. Managing personal human capital: new ethos for the ‘volunteer’ employee. European Management Journal, 2003. vol. 21(1) February, pp. 1-10. 22. Kuzminov Ya., Sorokin P., Froumin I. Generic and Specific Skills as Components of Human Capital: New Challenges for Education Theory and Practice. Foresight and STI Governance, 2019. vol. 13, no 2, pp. 19–41. DOI: 10.17323/2500-2597.2019.2.19.41. 23. McKinsey. Defining the skills citizens will need in the future world of work. 2021. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/industries/public-and-social-sector/our-insights/defining-the-skills-citizens-will-need-in-the-future-world-of-work (accessed April 09, 2022). 24. McKinsey, American Opportunity Survey, June 23, 2022. URL: https://www.mckinsey.com/featured-insights/sustainable-inclusive-growth/future-of-america/american-opportunity-survey (accessed April 09, 2022). 25. OECD. The Well-being of nations: The role of human and social capital. Paris: OECD. 2001. 26. OECD. Measuring the Digital Transformation: A Roadmap for the Future. Paris: OECD. 2019. 27. Ployhart R.E., Nyberg A.J., Reilly G., Maltarich M.A. Human capital is dead; Long live human capital resources. Journal of Management. 2014, No. 40, p. 371–398. DOI: 10.1177/0149206313512152 28. Samad, S. Achieving innovative firm performance through human capital and the effect of social capital. Management and Marketing, 2020. vol. 15(2), pp. 326-344. 29. The feasibility of measuring the sharing economy: November 2017 progress update. UK Office for National Statistics, 2017. URL: https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/economicoutputandproductivity/output/articles/thefeasibilityofmeasuringthesharingeconomy/november2017progressupdate#defining-the-sharing-economy (accessed April 09, 2022). |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/119368 |