Optimal patent licensing: from three to two part tariffs

Ma, Siyu and Sen, Debapriya and Tauman, Yair (2024): Optimal patent licensing: from three to two part tariffs. Forthcoming in: Economic Theory

Abstract

We study the licensing of a cost-reducing innovation in a Cournot oligopoly where an outside innovator uses three part tariffs that are combinations of upfront fees, per unit royalties and ad valorem royalties. Under general demand, the maximum possible licensing revenue under three part tariffs can be always attained by a policy that uses at most two of the three components. For relatively significant innovations, there exists an optimal policy consisting of a per unit royalty and upfront fee and a continuum of other optimal policies that are three part tariffs whose all components are positive. Completely characterizing optimal policies under linear demand, we show that for oligopolies with four or more firms: (i) pure upfront fees are optimal for insignificant innovations; (ii) for intermediate and significant innovations: (a) there is a continuum of optimal policies which always includes a two part tariff with unit royalty and upfront fee and (b) a two part tariff with an ad valorem royalty and fee or a two part royalty can be optimal for some, but not all parametric configurations.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: patent licensing; per unit royalties; ad valorem royalties; three part tariffs; acceptability and feasibility constraints
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D43 - Oligopoly and Other Forms of Market Imperfection; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D44 - Auctions; D - Microeconomics > D4 - Market Structure, Pricing, and Design > D45 - Rationing ; Licensing; L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L24 - Contracting Out ; Joint Ventures ; Technology Licensing

References

Arrow, K.J.: Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In: R.R. Nelson (Ed.)The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity. Princeton University Press (1962)

Amir, M., Amir, R., Jin, J.: Sequencing R&D decisions in a two-period duopoly with spillovers. Economic Theory 15, 297-317 (2000)

Amir, R.: Cournot oligopoly and the theory of supermodular games. Games and Economic Behavior 15, 132-148 (1996)

Amir, R., Lambson, V.: On the effects of entry in Cournot markets. Review of Economic Studies 67, 235-254 (2000)

Aulakh, P.S., Cavusgil, S.T., Sarkar, M.B.: Compensation in international licensing agreements. Journal of International Business Studies 29, 409-419 (1998)

Badia, B., Tauman, Y., Tumendemberel, B.: A note on Cournot equilibrium with positive price. Economics Bulletin 34, 1229-1234 (2014)

Banerjee, S., Mukherjee, A., Poddar, S.: Optimal patent licensing: two or three part tariffs. Journal of Public Economic Theory 25, 624-648 (2023)

Beggs A.W.: The licensing of patents under asymmetric information. International Journal of Industrial Organization 10, 171-191 (1992)

Bhattacharya, S., d'Aspremont, C., Guriev, S., Sen, D., Tauman, Y.: Cooperation in R&D: Patenting, licensing, and contracting. In: K. Chatterjee & W. Samuelson (Eds.), Game Theory and Business Applications, Springer. (2014)

Bousquet, A., Cremer, H., Ivaldi, M., Wolkowicz, M.: Risk sharing in licensing. International Journal of Industrial Organization 16, 535-554 (1998)

Brenner, S.: Optimal formation rules for patent pools. Economic Theory 40, 373-388 (2009)

Che, J., Facchini, G.: Cultural differences, insecure property rights and the mode of entry decision. Economic Theory 38, 465-484 (2009)

Choi, J.P., Stefanadis, C.: Sequential innovation, naked exclusion, and upfront lump-sum payments. Economic Theory 65, 891-915 (2018)

Colombo, S.: A comment on “welfare reducing licensing”. Games and Economic Behavior 76, 515-518 (2012)

Colombo, S., Filippini, L.: Patent licensing with Bertrand competitors. Manchester School 83, 1-16 (2015)

Colombo, S., Filippini, L.: Revenue royalties. Journal of Economics 118, 47-76 (2016)

Colombo, S., Filippini, L., Sen, D.: Patent licensing and capacity in a Cournot model. Review of Industrial Organization, 62, 45-62, (2023)

Colombo, S., Ma, S., Sen, D., Tauman, Y.: Equivalence between fixed fee and ad valorem profit royalty. Journal of Public Economic Theory 23, 1052-1073 (2021)

Dixit, A.: Comparative statics for oligopoly. International Economic Review 27, 107-122 (1986)

Duchêne, A., Sen, D., Serfes, K.: Patent licensing and entry deterrence: the role of low royalties. Economica 82, 1324-1348 (2015)

Duchêne, A., Serfes, K.: Patent settlements as a barrier to entry. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy, 21, 399-429 (2012)

Erutku, C., Richelle, Y.: Optimal licensing contracts and the value of a patent. Journal of Economics & Management Strategy 16, 407-436 (2007)

Eswaran, M.: Licensees as entry barriers. Canadian Journal of Economics, 27, 673-688 (1994).

Eun, C.S., Janakiramanan.: A model of international asset pricing with a constraint on the foreign equity ownership. Journal of Finance, 41, 897-914 (1986)

Fan, C., Jun, B.H., Wolfstetter, E.G.: Optimal licensing under incomplete information: the case of the inside patent holder. Economic Theory, 66, 979-1005 (2018a)

Fan, C., Jun, B.H., Wolfstetter, E.G.: Per unit vs. ad valorem royalty licensing. Economics Letters 170, 71-75 (2018b)

Fan, C., Jun, B.H., Wolfstetter, E.G.: Optimal licensing of technology in the face of (asymmetric) competition. International Journal of Industrial Organization 60, 32-53 (2018c)

Farrell, J., Shapiro, C.: Antitrust evaluation of horizontal mergers: An economic alternative to market definition. B.E. Journal of Theoretical Economics 10, 1-41 (2010)

Faulí-Oller , R., Sandonís, J.: Welfare reducing licensing. Games and Economic Behavior 41, 192-205 (2002)

Faulí-Oller , R., Sandonís, J.: Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly with increasing marginal costs. Manchester School 90, 439-452 (2022)

Filippini, L.: Licensing contract in a Stackelberg model. Manchester School 73, 582-598 (2005)

Gallini, N.T., Wright, B.D.: Technology transfer under asymmetric information. Rand Journal of Economics 21, 147-160 (1990)

Gaudet, G., Salant, S.W.: Uniqueness of Cournot equilibrium: new results from old methods. Review of Economic Studies 58, 399-404 (1991)

Gajigo, O., Mutambatsere, M., Ndiaye, G.: Royalty rates in African mining revisited: Evidence from gold mining. Africa Economic Brief 3, 1-11 (2012)

Heywood, J.S., Li, J., Ye, G.: Per unit vs. ad valorem royalties under asymmetric information. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 37, 38-46 (2014)

Hiroaki, I., Kawamori,T.: Oligopoly with a large number of competitors: asymmetric limit result. Economic Theory 39, 353-353 (2009)

Hoang, B.T., Mateus, C. How does liberalization affect emerging stock markets? Theories and empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 1-22 (2023)

Hogan, L., Goldsworthy, B.: International mineral taxation: experience and issues. In: P. Daniel, M. Keen & C. McPherson (Eds.), The Taxation of Petroleum and Minerals. Routledge, Taylor and Francis. (2010)

Kabiraj, T.: Patent licensing in a leadership structure. Manchester School, 72, 188-205 (2004)

Kamien, M.I.: Patent licensing. In: R.J. Aumann & S. Hart (Eds.), Handbook of Game Theory with Economic Applications. North Holland, Amsterdam. (1992)

Kamien, M.I., Tauman, Y.: Fees versus royalties and the private value of a patent. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101, 471-491 (1986)

Kamien, M.I., Oren, S.S., Tauman, Y.: Optimal licensing of cost-reducing innovation. Journal of Mathematical Economics 21, 483-508 (1992)

Kamien, M.I., Tauman, Y. (2002). Patent licensing: The inside story. Manchester School, 70, 7-15 (2002)

Katz, M.L., Shapiro, C.: On the licensing of innovations. Rand Journal of Economics 16, 504-520 (1985)

Katz, M.L., Shapiro, C.: How to license intangible property. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101, 567-590 (1986)

Liao, C-H., Sen, D.: Subsidy in licensing: optimality and welfare implications. Manchester School 73, 281-299 (2005)

Llanes, G., Trento, S.: Patent policy, patent pools, and the accumulation of claims in sequential innovation. Economic Theory 50, 703-725 (2012)

Leonardos, S., Petrakis, E., Skartados, P., Stamatopoulos, G.: Partial passive ownership holdings and licensing. Economics Letters, 204, 109910 (2021)

Ma, S., Tauman, Y.: Licensing of a new product innovation with risk averse agents. Review of Industrial Organization 59, 79-102 (2020)

Macho-Stadler, I., Pérez-Castrillo, D. : Contrats de licences et asymétrie d'information. Annales d'Économie et de Statistique 24, 189-208 (1991)

Macho-Stadler, I., Xavier Martinez-Giralt, X., Pérez-Castrillo, D. : The role of information in licensing contract design. Research Policy. 25, 25-41 (1996)

Marjit, S,: On a non-cooperative theory of technology transfer. Economics Letters 33, 293-298 (1990)

Mukherjee, A.: Technology transfer with commitment. Economic Theory 17. 345-369 (2001)

Mukhopadhyay, S., Kabiraj, T., Mukherjee, A.: Technology transfer in duopoly The role of cost asymmetry. International Review of Economics & Finance 8, 363-374 (1999)

Muto, S.: On licensing policies in Bertrand competition. Games and Economic Behavior 5, 257-267 (1993)

Niu, S.: The equivalence of profit-sharing licensing and per-unit royalty licensing. Economic Modelling 32, 10-14 (2013)

Niu, S.: The optimal licensing policy. Manchester School 82, 202-217 (2014)

Novshek, W.: On the existence of Cournot equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies 52, 85-98 (1985)

Poddar, S., Sinha, U.B.: On patent licensing in spatial competition. Economic Record 80, 208-218 (2004)

Rodriguez, G.E. Auctions of licences and market structure. Economic Theory 19, 283-309 (2002)

Rostoker, M.D.: A survey of corporate licensing. IDEA: The Journal of Law and Technology 24, 59-92 (1983)

San Martín, M., Saracho, A.I.: Royalty licensing. Economics Letters 107, 284-287 (2010)

San Martín, M., Saracho, A.I.: Optimal two-part tariff licensing mechanisms. Manchester School 83, 288-306 (2015)

Savva, N., Taneri, N.: The role of equity, royalty, and fixed fees in technology licensing to university spin-offs. Management Science, 61, 1323-1343 (2015)

Sen, D.: Monopoly profit in a Cournot oligopoly. Economics Bulletin 4(1), 1-6 (2002)

Sen, D.: Fee versus royalty reconsidered. Games and Economic Behavior 53, 141-147 (2005a)

Sen, D.: On the coexistence of different licensing schemes. International Review of Economics & Finance 14, 393-413 (2005b)

Sen, D., Stamatopoulos, G.: Technology transfer under returns to scale. Manchester School 77, 337-365 (2009a)

Sen, D., Stamatopoulos, G.: Drastic innovations and multiplicity of optimal licensing policies. Economics Letters 105, 7-10 (2009b)

Sen, D., Stamatopoulos, G.: Licensing under general demand and cost functions. European Journal of Operational Research 253, 673-680 (2016)

Sen, D., Stamatopoulos, G.: Decreasing returns, patent licensing, and price-reducing taxes. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 175, 291-307 (2019)

Sen, D., Tauman, Y.: General licensing schemes for a cost-reducing innovation. Games and Economic Behavior 59, 163-186 (2007)

Sen, D., Tauman, Y.: Patent licensing in a Cournot oligopoly: General results. Mathematical Social Sciences 96, 37-48 (2018)

Shapiro, C.: Patent licensing and R&D rivalry. American Economic Review, Papers & Proceedings, 75, 25-30 (1985)

Stamatopoulos, G., Tauman, Y.: Licensing of a quality-improving innovation. Mathematical Social Sciences 56, 410-438 (2008)

Suzumara, K.: Cooperative and noncooperative R&D in an oligopoly with spillovers. American Economic Review 82, 1307-1320 (1992)

Tauman, Y., Watanabe, N.: The Shapley value of a patent licensing game: the asymptotic equivalence to non-cooperative results. Economic Theory 30, 135-149 (2007)

Varner, T.R.: An economic perspective on patent licensing structure and provisions. Business Economics 46, 229-238 (2011)

Vishwasrao, S.: Royalties vs. fees: How do firms pay for foreign technology? International Journal of Industrial Organization 25, 741-759 (2007)

Wang, X.H.: Fee versus royalty licensing in a Cournot duopoly model. Economics Letters 60, 55-62 (1998)