Endogenous Technology Adoption Under Production Risk: Theory and Application to Irrigation Technology

Koundouri, Phoebe and Nauges, Celine and Tzouvelekas, Vangelis (2005): Endogenous Technology Adoption Under Production Risk: Theory and Application to Irrigation Technology. Published in:

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to present a theoretical framework that conceptualizes technology adoption as a decision process involving information acquisition by farmers who face yield uncertainty and vary in their risk preferences. This is done by integrating the microeconomic foundations used to analyze production uncertainty at the farm level with the traditional technological adoption models. First we follow the approach of Antle (1987) based on higher-order moments of profit, which enables flexible estimation of the stochastic technology without ad hoc specification of risk preferences. Then individual risk preferences are derived, which are then used to explain farmer’s decision to adopt modern water saving technologies. The proposed model is applied to a randomly selected sample of 265 farms located in Crete, Greece. Results show that risk preferences affect the probability of adoption and provide evidence that farmers invest in new technologies as a means of hedging against input related production risk.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: risk attitudes, technology adoption, stochastic agricultural production, moments-based estimation
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C36 - Instrumental Variables (IV) Estimation; D - Microeconomics > D0 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q1 - Agriculture

References

[1] Aigner, D., C. Lovell & P. Schmidt, 1977. Formulation and Estimation of Stochastic Production Models. Journal of Econometrics 6, 21-37. [2] Anderson, J., 1973. Sparse Data, Climatic Variability, and Yield Uncertainty in Response Analysis. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 55, 77-82.

[3] Antle, J., 1983. Testing the Stochastic Structure of Production: A Flexible Moment-Based Approach. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 1, 192-201.

[4] Antle, J., 1987. Econometric Estimation of Producers’ Risk Attitudes. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 509-522.

[5] Arabiyat, T.S., Segarra, E. and J.L. Johnson. (2001). Technology Adoption in Agriculture: Implications for Ground Water Conservation in the Texas High Plains. Res. Cons. Rec., 32 : 147-156.

[6] Ball, V.E., Bureau, J.C., Butault, J.P. and R. Nehring (2001). Levels of Farm Sector Productivity: An International Comparison. J.Prod. Anal., 15: 5-29.

[7] Bardhan, P., 1977. Variations in Forms of Tenancy in a Peasant Economy. Journal of Development Economy 4, 105-118.

[8] Batra, R., 1974. Resource Allocation in a General Equilibrium Model of Production under Uncertainty. Journal of Economic Theory 8, 50-63.

[9] Batz F.-J., Peters, K. J. and W. Janssen (1999). The Influence of Technology Characteristics on the Rate and Speed of Adoption. Agr. Econ., 21: 121-130.

[10] Binswanger, H., 1982. Empirical Estimation and Use of Risk Preference: Discussion. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 64, 391-393.

[11] Caswell, M. & D. Zilberman, 1985. The Choice of Irrigation Technologies in California. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 67, 224-234.

[12] Coupal, R.H. and P.N. Wilson (1990). Adoption Water-Conserving Irrigation Technology: The Case of Surge Irrigation in Arizona. Agr. Wat. Man., 18: 15-28.

[13] Day R., 1965. Probability Distribution of Field Crop Yields. J. Farm Econ. 47, 713-741.

[14] Dinar, A. and D. Yaron (1992). Adoption and Abandonment of Irrigation Technologies. Agr. Econ., 6: 315-332.

[15] Dinar, A. and D. Zilberman (1991). The Economics of Resource-Conservation, Pollution-Reduction Technology Selection: The Case of Irrigation Water. Res. Ener., 13: 323-348.

[16] Dinar, A., Campbell, M.B. and D. Zilberman (1992). Adoption of Improved Irrigation and Drainage Reduction Technologies under Limiting Environmental Conditions. Env. Res. Econ., 2: 360-373.

[17] Droogers, P., Kite, G. and H. Murray-Rust. (2000). Use of Simulation Models to Evaluate Irrigation Performance Including Water Productivity, Risk and System Analyses. Irrig. Sci., 19: 139-145.

[18] Feder G. and D. L. Umali (1993). The Adoption of Agricultural Innovations: A Review. Techn. For. and Soc. Ch., 43: 215-239.

[19] Fishelson, G. and D. Rymon. (1989). Adoption of Agricultural Innovations: The Case of Drip Irrigation of Cotton in Israel. Tech. For. Soc. Ch., 35: 375-382.

[20] Fuller, W., 1965. Stochastic Fertilizer Production Functions for Continuous Corn. J. Farm Econ. 47, 105-119.

[21] Green, G., D. Sunding, D. Zilberman & D. Parker, 1996. Explaining Irrigation Technology Choices: a Microparameter Approach. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 78, 1064-1072.

[22] Griffiths, W. & J. Anderson, 1982. Using Time-Series and Cross-Section Data to Estimate a Production Function With Positive and Negative Marginal Risks. Journal of the American Statistical Association 77, 529-536.

[23] Griliches, Z. (1957). Hybrid Corn: An Exploration in the Economics of Technological Change. Econometrica, 25: 501-523.

[24] Groom, B., Koundouri, P., Nauges, C., and A. Thomas, 2002. Stochastic Technology and Risk Attitudes in Agricultural Production. World Congress of Environmental and Resource Economics, Monterey, USA.

[25] Hazell, P., 1982. Application of Risk Preference Estimates in Firm-Household and Agricultural Sector Models. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64, 384-390.

[26] Jensen, R. (1982). Adoption and Diffusion of an Innovation of Uncertain Profitability. J. Econ. Th., 27: 182-192.

[27] Just, R. & R. Pope, 1978. Stochastic Representation of Production Functions and Econometric Implications. Journal of Econometrics 7, 67-86.

[28] Just, R. & R. Pope, 1979. Production Function Estimation and Related Risk Considerations. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 276-284.

[29] Kumbhakar, S.C., 2002. Specification and Estimation of Production Risk, Risk Preferences and Technical Efficiency. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 84, 8-22.

[30] Liodakis, G. (2000). The Cretan Agricultural Sector: Structural Problems and Future Prospects. Chania: TUC Press (in Greek).

[31] Love, H.A. & S.T. Buccola, 1991. Joint Risk Preference-Technology Estimation with a Primal System. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 73, 765-774.

[32] Love, H.A. & S.T. Buccola, 1999. Joint Risk Preference-Technology Estimation with a Primal System: Reply. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 81, 245-247.

[33] Moore, M., N. Gollehon & M. Carey, 1994a. Multicrop Production Decisions in Western Irrigated Agriculture: The Role of Water Price. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 76, 859-874.

[34] Moore, M. N. Gollehon & M. Carey, 1994b. Alternative Models of Input Allocation in Multicrop Systems: Irrigation Water in the Central Plains, United States. Agricultural Economics 11, 143-158.

[35] Moore, M. & D. Negri, 1992. A Multicrop Production Model of Irrigated Agriculture, Applied to Water Allocation Policy of the Bureau of Reclamation. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 17, 29-43.

[36] Negri, D. & D. Brooks, 1990. The Determinants of Irrigation Technology Choice. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 15, 213-223.

[37] Nieswiadomy, M., 1988. Input Substitution in Irrigated Agriculture in the High Plains of Texas, 1970-80. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 13, 63-70.

[38] Ogg, C. & N. Gollehon, 1989. Western Irrigation Response to Pumping Costs: A Water Demand Analysis Using Climatic Regions. Water Resources Research 25, 767- 773.

[39] Politis D. and J. Romano (1994). Large Sample Confidence Regions Based on Sub-samples Under Minimal Assumptions. Ann. Stat., 22: 2031-2050.

[40] Pope, R., 1982. Empirical Estimation and Use of Risk Preference: An Appraisal of Estimation Methods That Use Actual Economic Decisions. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 64, 376-383.

[41] Tsur, Y., Sternberg, M. and E. Hochman (1990). Dynamic Modeling of Innovation Process Adoption with Risk Aversion and Learning. Oxf. Econ. Pap., 42: 336-355.

[42] Saha, A., Love, A.H. and R. Schwart (1994). Adoption of Emerging Technologies Under Output Uncertainty. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 76: 386-846.

[43] Santos, F.L. (1996). Evaluation and Adoption of Irrigation Technologies: Management-Design Curves for Furrow and Level Basin Systems. Agr. Syst., 52: 317-329.

[44] Stallings, J.L. (1960). Weather Indexes. J. Farm Econ., 42: 180-186.

[45] Schaible, G., C. Kim & N. Whittlesey, 1991. Water Conservation Potential from Irrigation Technology Transitions in the Pacific North-West. Western Journal of Agricultural Economics 16, 194-206.

[46] Stiglitz, J., 1974. Incentives and Risk Sharing in Sharecropping. Review of Economic Studies 41, 219-255.

[47] Whinlesey, N., McNeal, B. and V. Obersinner (1986). Concepts Affecting Irrigation Management, in Energy and Water Management in Western Irrigated Agriculture, N. Whinlesey (ed.), Boulder: Westview Press.

[48] Yaron, D., Dinar, A. and H. Voet (1992). Innovations on Family Farms: The Nazareth Region in Israel. Am. J. Agr. Econ., 74: 361-370.