Patents and Dual-use Technology: An Empirical Study of the World's Largest Defence Companies

Acosta, Manuel and Coronado, Daniel and Ferrándiz, Esther and Marín, M. Rosario and Moreno, Pedro J. (2018): Patents and Dual-use Technology: An Empirical Study of the World's Largest Defence Companies. Published in: Defence and Peace Economics , Vol. 7, No. 29 (2018): pp. 821-839.

Abstract

This paper examines the generation of technological knowledge by leading companies in the defence industry. In particular, we test whether the characteristics of large defence companies are related to both the production of different types of patents (civilian, military and mixed), and the generation of dual-use technologies. To explore these links, we rely on economic data for the top-100 defence companies from the Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI) database, and patent information from the Worldwide Patent Statistical Database (Patstat). Our results show that the relationship between the production of civilian patents and the size of the company is positive and significant. However, this relationship does not hold for the production of military patents. Furthermore, the military commercial profile is unrelated to the generation of military patents. Regarding the involvement in dual-use technologies, firms engaged in dual-use are those with higher military sales, a greater number of employees and a larger number of patents (civilian, military and mixed) than those not engaged in dual-use. Furthermore, we found a skill effect (more involvement in dual-use per employee) in European firms compared to US firms. These findings help to identify which firms should be targeted by government policies if increasing dual-use technologies becomes a political objective.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: dual-use technologies; patents; patent citations; large defence firms; technological knowledge
• Subjects: L - Industrial Organization > L2 - Firm Objectives, Organization, and Behavior > L22 - Firm Organization and Market Structure; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O3 - Innovation ; Research and Development ; Technological Change ; Intellectual Property Rights > O31 - Innovation and Invention: Processes and Incentives

References

1. Acosta, M., & Coronado, D. (2003). Science technology flows in Spanish regions: An analysis of scientific citations in patents. Research Policy, 32, 1783–1803.

2. Acosta, M., Coronado, D., & Marín, M. R. (2011). Potential dual use of military technology: Can patents shed light on it? Defence and Peace Economics, 22, 335–349.

3. Acosta, M., Coronado, D., Marín, R., & Prats, P. (2013). Factors affecting the diffusion of patented military technology in the field of weapons and ammunition. Scientometrics, 94, 1–22.

4. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1987). Innovation, market structure, and firm size. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 69(4), 567–574.

5. Alic, J., Branscomb, L., Brooks, H., Carter, A., & Epstein, G. (1992). Beyond spinoff: Military and commercial technologies in a changing world. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.

6. Amesse, F., Cohendet, P., Poirier, A., & Chouinard, J. M. (2002). Economic effects and spin-offs in a small space economy: The case of Canada. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(4), 339–348.

7. Archibugi, D. (1992). Patenting as an indicator of technological innovation: A review. Science and Public Policy, 19(6), 357–368.

8. Audretsch, D. B., Bozeman, B., Combs, K. L., Feldman, M., Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., Stephan, P., Tassey, G., & Wessner, C. (2002). The economics of science and technology. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 27(2), 155–203.

9. Avadikyan, A., Cohendet, P., & Dupouët, O. (2005). A study of military innovation diffusion based on two case studies. In P. Llerena & M. Mireille (Eds.), Innovation policy in a knowledge-based economy (pp. 161–189). Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.

10. Barrio-Castro, T. D., & García-Quevedo, J. (2005). Effects of university research on the geography of innovation. Regional Studies, 39(9), 1217–1229.

11. Bacchiocchi, E., & Montobbio, F. (2010). International knowledge diffusion and home‐bias effect: Do USPTO and EPO patent citations tell the same story? The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 112(3), 441–470.

12. Becker, B. (2015). Public R&D policies and private R&D investment: A survey of the empirical evidence. Journal of Economic Surveys, 29(5), 917–942.

13. Belin, J., & Guille, M. (2008). Defence and firm financial structure in France. Review of Financial Economics, 17(1), 46–61.

14. Bellais, R., & Guichard, R. (2006). Defense innovation, technology transfers, and public policy. Defence and Peace Economics, 17(3), 273–286.

15. Breschi, S., & Lissoni, F. (2004). Knowledge networks from patent data: Methodological issues and research targets. CESPRI Working Papers. Milan: Universita L. Bocconi.

16. Brzoska, M. (2006). Trends in global military and civilian research and development and their changing interface. In Proceedings of the International Seminar on Defence Finance and Economics (pp. 1–23). New Delhi, November 13–15.

17. Cauzic, F., Colas, H., Leridon, N., Lourmi, S., & Waelbroeck-Rocha, E. (2009). A comprehensive analysis of emerging competences and skill needs for optimal preparation and management of change in the EU defence industry. Final Report, Eurostrategies, 20.

18. Chakrabarti, A. K., Glismann, H. H., & Horn, E. -J. (1992). Defence and space expenditures in the US: An inter-firm analysis. Defence Economics, 3(2), 169–189.

19. Chiu, Y. -C., Lai, H. -C., Liaw, Y. -C., & Lee, T. -Y. (2010). Technological scope: Diversified or specialized. Scientometrics, 82(1), 37–58.

20. Cowan, R., & Foray, D. (1995). Quandaries in the economics of dual technologies and spillovers from military to civilian research and development. Research Policy, 24, 851–868.

21. European Commission. (2014). A new deal for European defence: Implementation roadmap for communication COM (2013) 542 towards a more competitive and efficient defence and security sector. COM 0387, June 2014.

22. Granstrand, O., & Oskarsson, C. (1994). Technology diversification in “MUL-TECH” corporations. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 41(4), 355–364.

23. Golde, S., & Tishler, A. (2004). Security needs, arms exports, and the structure of the defense industry determining the security level of countries. Journal of Conflict Resolution, 48(5), 672–698.

24. Goyal, V. K., Lehn, K., & Racic, S. (2002). Growth opportunities and corporate debt policy: The case of the US defense industry. Journal of Financial Economics, 64, 35–59.

25. Griliches, Z. (1990). Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28(4), 1661–1707.

26. Guillou, S., Lazaric, N., Longhi, C., & Rochhia, S. (2009). The French defence industry in the knowledge management era: A historical overview and evidence from empirical data. Research Policy, 38(1), 170–180.

27. Halpern, B. H., & Snider, K. F. (2012). Products that kill and corporate social responsibility: The case of US defense firms. Armed Forces & Society, 38(4), 604–624.

28. Hartley, K. (2003). The future of European defence policy: An economic perspective. Defence and Peace Economics, 14(2), 107–115.

29. Hartley, K. (2008). Collaboration and European defence industrial policy. Defence and Peace Economics, 19(4), 303–315.

30. Jaffe, A., Fogarty, M. S., & Banks, B. A. (1998). Evidence from patents and patent citations on the impact of NASA and other federal labs on commercial innovation. Journal of Industrial Economics, 46, 183–205.

31. Jaffe, A., & Trajtenberg, M. (2002). Patent citations and innovations: A window on the knowledge economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

32. Jaffe, A., Trajtenberg, M., & Fogarty, M. (2000). Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors. American Economic Review, 90, 215–218.

33. James, A. D. (2006). The transatlantic defence R&D gap: Causes, consequences and controversies. Defence and Peace Economics, 17(3), 223–238.

34. James, A. D. (2009). Re-evaluating the role of military research in innovation systems: Introduction to the symposium. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34, 449–454.

35. Kulve, H., & Smit, W. A. (2003). Civilian-military co-operation strategies in developing new technologies. Research Policy, 32, 955–970.

36. Larsen, P. B. (2001). Issues relating to civilian and military dual uses of GNSS. Space Policy, 17(2), 111–119.

37. Lee, J. J., & Yoon, H. (2015). A comparative study of technological learning and organizational capability development in complex product systems: Distinctive paths of three latecomers in the military aircraft industry. Research Policy, 44, 1296–1313.

38. Leten, B., Belderbos, R., & Van Looy, B. (2007). Technological diversification, coherence, and performance of firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 24(6), 567–579.

39. Martí-Sempere, C. (2016). What is known about defence research and development spill-overs? Defence and Peace Economics. https://doi.org/10.1080/10242694.2016.1239364

40. Martin, S., White, R., & Hartley, K. (1996). Defence and firm performance in the UK. Defence and Peace Economics, 7, 325–337.

41. Matelly, S., & Lima, M. (2016). The influence of the state on the strategic choices of defence companies: The cases of Germany, France and the UK after the Cold War. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 2, 61–88.

42. Mérindol, V., & Versailles, D. W. (2010). Dual use as knowledge-oriented policy: France during the 1990–2000s. International Journal of Technology Management, 50(1), 80–98.

43. Meunier, F. X., & Zyla, C. (2016). Firm growth and knowledge flows: Comparative analysis between defence and civil areas. Journal of Innovation Economics & Management, 20, 89–108.

44. Molas-Gallart, J. (1997). Which way to go? Defence technology and the diversity of dual-use technology transfer. Research Policy, 26, 367–385.

45. Molas-Gallart, J. (2002). Coping with dual-use: A challenge for European research policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 40(1), 155–165.

46. Mowery, D. C., & Rosenberg, N. (1982). Technical change in the commercial aircraft industry, 1925–1975. In N. Rosenberg (Ed.), Inside the black box: Technology and economics (pp. 163–177). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

47. Mowery, D. C., & Simcoe, T. (2002). Is the internet a US invention?—An economic and technological history of computer networking. Research Policy, 31(8), 1369–1387.

48. Mowery, D. C. (2010). Military R&D and innovation. In B. Hall & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), Handbook of the economics of innovation (pp. 1220–1256). Amsterdam: Elsevier.

49. Mowery, D. C. (2012). Defense-related R&D as a model for 'grand challenges' technology policies. Research Policy, 41(10), 1703–1715.

50. Rogers, M. (2004). Networks, firm size, and innovation. Small Business Economics, 22(2), 141–153.

51. Santarelli, E., & Sterlacchini, A. (1990). Innovation, formal vs. informal R&D, and firm size: Some evidence from Italian manufacturing firms. Small Business Economics, 2(3), 223–228.

52. Shefi, Y., & Tishler, A. (2005). The effects of the world defense industry and US military aid to Israel on the Israeli defense industry: A differentiated products model. Defence and Peace Economics, 16(6), 427–448.

53. Stowsky, J. (2004). Secrets to shield or share? New dilemmas for military R&D policy in the digital age. Research Policy, 33(2), 257–269.

54. Trajtenberg, M. (2006). Defense R&D in the anti-terrorist era. Defence and Peace Economics, 17(3), 177–199.

55. Venturini, K., Verbano, C., & Matsumoto, M. (2013). Space technology transfer: Spinoff cases from Japan. Space Policy, 29(1), 49–57.

56. Wallin, M. W. (2012). The bibliometric structure of spin-off literature. Innovation: Management, Policy & Practice, 14(2), 162–177.

57. Wang, T. -P., Shyu, S. H. P., & Chou, H. -C. (2012). The impact of defense expenditure on economic productivity in OECD countries. Economic Modelling, 29, 2101–2114.