Analysis of green net national product and genuine saving in Portugal, 1991 - 2005

Mota, Rui Pedro and Domingos, Tiago and Martins, Victor (2008): Analysis of green net national product and genuine saving in Portugal, 1991 - 2005.

Abstract

The context of this paper is the measurement of welfare and weak sustainability, defined as non-declining utility, in dynamic economies, i.e., green, environmental or comprehensive accounting. We estimate the green net national product and genuine saving for Portugal 1991-2005, accounting for the disamenity of air pollution emissions, the depreciation of commercial forests - pine and eucalyptus -, the value of time (through technological progress), excluding the effect of business cycles and discussing the assumptions behind the usual terms included in the empirics of comprehensive accounting. For the accounting period considered we find that both GNNP and GS are positive, thereby indicating no sustainability problem in Portugal, although both GNNP and GS depict a trend towards unsustainability. Excluding technological progress there is a contradiction in the sustainability message: GS is negative after 2002, whereas GNNP is always positive, indicating that welfare increased.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Welfare measures; green accounting; technological progress; business cycles
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C51 - Model Construction and Estimation; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C61 - Optimization Techniques ; Programming Models ; Dynamic Analysis; Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q2 - Renewable Resources and Conservation > Q20 - General

References

Asheim, G.B., 2007. Can NNP be used for welfare comparisons? Environment and Development Economics 12, 11-31.

Asheim, G.B., Weitzman, M.L., 2001. Does NNP growth indicate welfare improvement? Economics Letters 73, 233-239.

Asheim, G.B., Buchholz, W., Withagen, C., 2003. The Hartwick rule: Myths and facts. Environmental and Resource Economics 25(2), 129-150.

Ayres, R., Warr, B., 2005. Accounting for growth: the role of physical work. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics 16(2), 181-209.

Boarini, R., Johansson, A., d’Ercole, M., 2006. Alternative measures of well-being. OECD Social, employment and migration working papers.

Hamilton, K., Atkinson, G., 1996. Air pollution and green accounts. Energy Policy 24(7), 675-684.

Hamilton, K., Clemens, M., 1999. Genuine saving rates in developing countries. World Bank Economic Review 13(2), 333-56.

Holland, M., Pye, S., Watkiss, P., Droste-Franke, B., Bickel, P., 2005. Damages per tonne emission of PM2.5, NH3, SO2, NOx and VOCs from each EU25 Member State (excluding Cyprus) and surrounding seas. March 2005. Available at http://www.cafe-cba.org/reports/.

Lange, G-M., 2003. Policy applications of environmental accounting. Environmental economic series, paper nº 88. The World Bank Environment Department, Washington.

Li, C.Z., Löfgren, K.G., 2006. Comprehensive NNP, social welfare, and the rate of return. Economics Letters 90, 254-259.

Marta-Pedroso, C., Freitas, H., Domingos, T., 2007. Testing for the survey mode effect on contingent valuation data quality: A case study of web based versus in-person interviews. Ecological Economics 62(3-4), 388-398.

Mendes, A., 2005. Portugal, in Merlo, M. and Croitoru, L. (eds.), Valuing Mediterranean Forests: Towards Total Economic Value, Wallingford: CABI Publishing

Pearce, D., Atkinson, G., 1993. Capital theory and the measurement of sustainable development: an indicator of 'weak' sustainability. Ecological Economics 8(2), 103-108

Pezzey, J., 2004. One-sided sustainability tests with amenities, and changes in technology, trade and population. Journal of Environment Economics and Management 48, 613-631.

Pezzey, J., Hanley, N., Turner, K., Tinch, D., 2006. Comparing augmented sustainability measures for Scotland: Is there a mismatch? Ecological Economics 57, 60-74

Ravn, M., Uhlig, H., 2002. On adjusting the Hodrick-Prescott filter for the frequency of observations. The Review of Economics and Statistics 84(2), 371-376.

UN, 2003. Handbook of National Accounting: Integrated Environmental and Economic Accounting. New York: United Nations

Vincent, J., Hartwick, J., 1998. Accounting for the benefits of forest resources: concepts and experience, Report Commissioned by the FAO Forestry Department, mimeo.

Vincent, J., Panayotou, T., Hartwick, J., 1997. Resource depletion and sustainability in small open economies. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 33, 274-286. Sefton, J., Weale, M., 2006. The concept of income in a general equilibrium. Review of Economic Studies 73, 219-249

Weitzman, M., 1976. On the welfare significance of national product in a dynamic economy. Quarterly Journal of Economics 90, 156-162.

Weitzman, M., 1997. Sustainability and technical progress. Scandinavian Journal of Economics 99(1), 1-13.