Risk-seeking behavior of preschool children in a gambling task

Moreira, Bruno and Matsushita, Raul and Da Silva, Sergio (2008): Risk-seeking behavior of preschool children in a gambling task.

Abstract

A recent neurobiology study showed that monkeys systematically prefer risky targets in a visual gambling task. We set a similar experiment with preschool children to assess their attitudes toward risk and found the children, like the monkeys, to be risk seeking. This suggests that adult humans are not born risk averse, but become risk averse. Our experiment also suggests that this behavioral change may be due to learning from negative experiences in their risky choices. We also showed that though emotional states and predetermined prenatal testosterone can influence children’s preferences toward risk, these factors could not override learning experiences.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Risk; Children
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C92 - Laboratory, Group Behavior; D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D87 - Neuroeconomics

References

Allais, M. (1953). Le comportement de l’homme rationnel devant le risque, critique des postulats et axioms de l’ecole americaine. Econometrica, 21, 503−546.

Apicella, C.L., Dreber, A., Campbell, B., Gray, P.B., Hoffman, M. &. Little, A.C. (2008). Testosterone and financial risk preferences. Evolution and Human Behavior, 29, 384390.

Bargh, J.A., Chaiken, S., Raymond, P. & Hymes, C. (1996). The automatic evaluation effect: Unconditional automatic attitude activation with a pronunciation task. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 32, 104−128.

Bateson, M. (2002). Recent advances in our understanding of risk-sensitive foraging preferences. Proceedings of the Nutrition Society, 61, 509−516.

Baxter, M.G., Parker, A., Lindner, C.C.C., Izquierdo, A.D. & Murray, E.A. (2000). Control of response selection by reinforcer value requires interaction of amygdala and orbital prefrontal cortex. The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 4311–4319.

Bechara, A. & Damasio, A.R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336–372.

Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D. & Damasio, A.R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 12931294.

Behrens, T.E.J., Woolrich, M.W., Walton, M.E. & Rushworth, M.F.S. (2007). Learning the value of information in an uncertain world. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1214–1221.

Bell, D.E. (1985). Disappointment in decision making under uncertainty. Operational Research, 33, 1–27.

Bell, D. (1982). Regret and decision making under uncertainty. Operational Research, 30, 961–981.

Bernoulli, D. (1738). Specimen theoriae novae de mensura sortis. Commentarii Academiae Scientiarum Imperialis Petropolitanae, 5, 175−192. English translation: L. Sommer (1954) Econometrica, 22, 23−36.

Botvinick, M.M., Braver, T.S., Barch, D.M., Carter, C.S. & Cohen, J.D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108, 624–652.

Bradgon, A.D. & Gamon, D. (2000). Brains that work a little bit differently. Brainwaves, Bass River, MA.

Brand, M., Grabenhorst, F., Starcke, K., Vandekerckhove, M.M.P. & Markowitsch, H.J. (2007). Role of the amygdala in decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Evidence from patients with Urbach-Wiethe disease. Neuropsychologia, 45, 1305–1317.

Byrnes, J.P., Miller, D.C. & Schafer, W.D. (1999). Gender differences in risk-taking: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125, 367−383.

Camerer, C., Loewenstein, G. & Prelec, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: How neuroscience can inform economics. Journal of Economic Literature, 43, 9−64.

Chambers, R.A., Taylor, J.R. & Potenza, M.N. (2003). Developmental neurocircuitry of motivation in adolescence: A critical period of addiction vulnerability. American Journal of Psychiatry, 160, 10411052.

Damasio, A.R. (1995). Toward a neurobiology of emotion and feeling: Operational concepts and hypotheses. Neuroscience, 1, 19–25.

Davidson, R.J. & Irwin, W. (1999). The functional neuroanatomy of emotion and affective style. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 3, 11−21.

Dean, H.L., Crowley, J.C. & Platt, M.L. (2004). Visual and saccade-related activity in macaque posterior cingulate cortex. Journal of Neurophysiology, 92, 3056–3068.

Gallagher, M. (2000). The amygdala and associative learning. In J.P. Aggleton (Ed.), The amygdala: a functional analysis, 2nd edition (pp. 311–330). New York: Oxford University Press.

Giner-Sorolla, R. (2001). Guilty pleasures and grim necessities: Affective attitudes in dilemmas of self-control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 206221.

Hamann, S.B., Ely, T.D., Grafton, S.T. & Kilts, C.D. (1999). Amygdala activity related to enhanced memory for pleasant and aversive stimuli. Nature Neuroscience, 2, 289–293.

Jehle, G.A. & Reny, P.J. (2001). Advanced microeconomic theory, 2nd edition. Boston: Addison Wesley Longman.

Kable, J.W. & Glimcher, P.W. (2007). The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 10, 1625–1633.

Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263−291.

Kelley, A.E., Schochet T. & Landry, C.F. (2004). Risk taking and novelty seeking in adolescence. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 2732.

Loewenstein, G.F., Weber, E.U., Hsee, C.K. & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 267–286.

Manning, J.T. (2002). Digit ratio: a pointer to fertility, behaviour, and health. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

March, J.G. (1996). Learning to be risk averse. Psychological Review, 103, 309319.

McCoy, A.N. & Platt, M.L. (2005). Risk-sensitive neurons in macaque posterior cingulate cortex. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1220–1227.

McCoy, A.N., Crowley, J.C., Haghighian, G., Dean, H.L. & Platt, M.L. (2003). Saccade reward signals in posterior cingulate cortex. Neuron, 40, 1031–1040.

Olson, C.R., Musil, S.Y. & Goldberg, M.E. (1996). Single neurons in posterior cingulate cortex of behaving macaque: Eye movement signals. Journal of Neurophysiology, 76, 3285–3300.

Panksepp, J. (1998). Affective neuroscience: the foundations of human and animal emotions. New York: Oxford University Press.

Platt, M.L. & Huettel, S.A. (2008). Risky business: The neuroeconomics of decision making under uncertainty. Nature Neuroscience, 11, 398−403.

Quirk, G.J., Likhtik, E., Pelletier, J.G. & Pare, D. (2003). Stimulation of medial prefrontal cortex decreases the responsiveness of central amygdala output neurons. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 8800–8807.

Rasanen, P., Hakko, H., Isohanni, M., Hodgins, S., Jarvelin, M. R. & Tiihonen, J. (1999). Maternal smoking during pregnancy and risk of criminal behavior among adult male offspring in the Northern Finland 1966 birth cohort. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156, 857−862.

Robson, A.J. (1996). The evolution of attitudes towards risk: Lottery tickets and relative wealth. Games and Economic Behavior, 14, 190207.

Rode, C., Cosmides, L., Hell, W. & Tooby, J. (1999). When and why do people avoid unknown probabilities in decisions under uncertainty? Testing some predictions from optimal foraging theory. Cognition, 72, 269304.

Rosenkranz, J.A., Moore, H. & Grace, A.A. (2003). The prefrontal cortex regulates lateral amygdala neuronal plasticity and responses to previously conditioned stimuli. The Journal of Neuroscience, 23, 11054 –11064.

Schneider, W. & Shiffrin, R.M. (1977). Controlled and automatic human information processing: I. Detection, search and attention. Psychological Review, 84, 1−66.

Smith, K., Dickhaut, J., McCabe, K. & Pardo, J.V. (2002). Neuronal substrates for choice under ambiguity, risk, gains, and losses. Management Science, 48, 711–718.

Steinberg L. (2004). Risk taking in adolescence: What changes, and why? Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1021, 5158.

Sutton, R.S. & Barto, A.G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: an introduction. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Trepel, C., Fox, C.R. & Poldrack, R.A. (2005). Prospect theory on the brain? Toward a cognitive neuroscience of decision under risk. Cognitive Brain Research, 23, 34−50.

Tversky, A. & Kahneman, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: Cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297−323.

Van Den Bergh, B. & Dewitte, S. (2006). Digit ratio (2D:4D) moderates the impact of sexual cues on men’s decisions in ultimatum games. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London B, 273, 2091–2095.

Vogt, B.A., Finch, D.M. & Olson, C.R. (1992). Functional heterogeneity in cingulate cortex: the anterior executive and posterior evaluative regions. Cerebral Cortex, 2, 435–443.

Von Neumann, J. & Morgenstern, O. (1944). Theory of games and economic behavior. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J.L., Driver, J. & Dolan, R. (2001). Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 30, 829–841.

Watson, D., Wiese, D., Vaidya, J. & Tellegen, A. (1999). The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76, 820–838.

Zajonc, R.B. (1980). Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences. American Psychologist, 35, 151−175.