Takahashi, Taiki and Hadzibeganovic, Tarik and Cannas, Sergio and Makino, Takaki and Fukui, Hiroki and Kitayama, Shinobu (2009): Cultural neuroeconomics of intertemporal choice.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_16814.pdf Download (189kB) | Preview |
Abstract
According to theories of cultural neuroscience, Westerners and Easterners may have distinct styles of cognition (e.g., different allocation of attention). Previous research has shown that Westerners and Easterners tend to utilize analytical and holistic cognitive styles, respectively. On the other hand, little is known regarding the cultural differences in neuroeconomic behavior. For instance, economic decisions may be affected by cultural differences in neurocomputational processing underlying attention; however, this area of neuroeconomics has been largely understudied. In the present paper, we attempt to bridge this gap by considering the links between the theory of cultural neuroscience and neuroeconomic theory of the role of attention in intertemporal choice. We predict that (i) Westerners are more impulsive and inconsistent in intertemporal choice in comparison to Easterners, and (ii) Westerners more steeply discount delayed monetary losses than Easterners. We examine these predictions by utilizing a novel temporal discounting model based on Tsallis' statistics (i.e. a q-exponential model). Our preliminary analysis of temporal discounting of gains and losses by Americans and Japanese confirmed the predictions from the cultural neuroeconomic theory. Future study directions, employing computational modeling via neural networks, are briefly outlined and discussed.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Cultural neuroeconomics of intertemporal choice |
English Title: | Cultural neuroeconomics of intertemporal choice |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | Cultural neuroscience; neuroeconomics; intertemporal choice; attention allocation; Tsallis’ statistics; neural networks |
Subjects: | C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C6 - Mathematical Methods ; Programming Models ; Mathematical and Simulation Modeling > C63 - Computational Techniques ; Simulation Modeling C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C0 - General > C02 - Mathematical Methods Z - Other Special Topics > Z1 - Cultural Economics ; Economic Sociology ; Economic Anthropology > Z19 - Other C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C4 - Econometric and Statistical Methods: Special Topics > C49 - Other C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C9 - Design of Experiments > C91 - Laboratory, Individual Behavior |
Item ID: | 16814 |
Depositing User: | Tarik Hadzibeganovic |
Date Deposited: | 18 Aug 2009 00:18 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 06:06 |
References: | Amit, D. J., Gutfreund, H., & Sompolinsky, H. (1985). Storing infinite numbers of patterns in a spin-glass model of neural networks. Physical Review Letters, 55, 1530–1533. Boettiger, C.A., Mitchell, J.M., Tavares, V.C., Robertson, M., Joslyn, G., D’Esposito, M., & Fields, H.L. (2007). Immediate reward bias in humans: Fronto-parietal networks and a role for the catechol-O-methyltransferase 158(Val/Val) genotype. Journal of Neuroscience, 27 (52), 14383–14391. Cannas, S. A., Stariolo, D., & Tamarit, F. A. (1996). Learning dynamics of simple perceptrons with non-extensive cost functions. Network: Computation in Neural Sciences, 7, 141–149. Cajueiro, D.O. (2006). A note on the relevance of the q-exponential function in the context of intertemporal choices. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 364 (15), 385–388. Chiao, J.Y., & Ambady, N. (2007). Cultural neuroscience: Parsing universality and diversity across levels of analysis. In Kitayama, S. & Cohen, D. (Eds.) Handbook of Cultural Psychology (pp. 237–254). NY: Guilford Press. Chua, H. F., Boland, J.E., & Nisbett, R.E. (2005). Cultural variation in eye movements during scene perception. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 102, 12629–12633. Ebert, J., & Prelec. D. (2007). The fragility of time: Time-insensitivity and valuation of the near and far future. Management Science, 53, 1423–1438. Estle, S.J., Green, L., Myerson, J., Holt, D.D. (2006). Differential effects of amount on temporal and probability discounting of gains and losses. Memory & Cognition, 34 (4), 914–928. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., & O’ Donoghue, T. (2002). Time discounting and time preference: A critical review. Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 350–401. Glimcher, P.W., & Rustichini, A. (2004). Neuroeconomics: The consilience of brain and decision. Science, 306 (5695), 447–452. Hadzibeganovic, T., & Cannas, S.A. (2007). Complexity and Nonextensivity in Natural and Artificial Language Learning Dynamic Systems. In S. Rhee & J.-H. Lee (Eds.), Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Discourse and Cognitive Linguistics, Korea University, Seoul (pp. 96–110). Seoul: Hankuk Publishing Co. Hadzibeganovic, T., & Cannas, S.A. (2009). A Tsallis' statistics based neural network model for novel word learning. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 388 (5), 732-746. Hariri, A.R., Brown, S.M., Williamson, D.E., Flory, J.D., de Wit, H., & Manuck, S.B. (2006). Preference for immediate over delayed rewards is associated with magnitude of ventral striatal activity. Journal of Neuroscience, 26 (51), 13213–13217. Hedden, T., Ketay, S., Aron, A., Markus, H.R., & Gabrieli, J.D. (2008). Cultural influences on neural substrates of attentional control. Psychological Science, 19 (1), 12–17. Hopfield, J. J. (1982). Neural networks and physical systems with emergent collective computational abilities. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 79, 2554–2558. Kable, J.W., & Glimcher, P.W. (2007). The neural correlates of subjective value during intertemporal choice. Nature Neuroscience, 10 (12), 1625–1633. Kitayama, S., Duffy, S., Kawamura, T., & Larsen, J. T. (2003). Perceiving an object and its context in different cultures: A cultural look at new look. Psychological Science, 14, 201–206. Lee, D. (2005). Neuroeconomics: Making risky choices in the brain. Nature Neuroscience, 8 (9), 1129–1130. Loewenstein, G., Rick, S., & Cohen, J.D. (2008). Neuroeconomics. Annual Review of Psychology, 59, 647–672. Markus, H., & Kitayama, S. (1991). Culture and the self: Implications for cognition, emotion, and motivation. Psychological Review, 98, 224–253. Masuda, T., & Nisbett, R.E. (2001). Attending holistically versus analytically: Comparing the context sensitivity of Japanese and Americans. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 922–934. McClure, S.M., Laibson, D.I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J.D. (2004). Separate neural systems value immediate and delayed monetary rewards. Science, 306 (5695), 503–507. McClure, S.M., Ericson, K.M., Laibson, D.I., Loewenstein, G., & Cohen, J.D. (2007). Time discounting for primary rewards. Journal of Neuroscience, 27 (21), 5796–5804. Michael, F., & Johnson, M.D. (2003). Financial market dynamics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 320, 525–534. Monterosso, J.R., Ainslie, G., Xu, J., Cordova, X., Domier, C.P., & London, E.D. (2007). Frontoparietal cortical activity of methamphetaminedependent and comparison subjects performing a delay discounting task. Human Brain Mapping, 28 (5), 383–393. Read, D., & Roelofsma, P.H.M.P. (2003). Subadditive versus hyperbolic discounting: A comparison of choice and matching. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 91 (2), 140–153. Sanfey, A.G., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S.M., & Cohen, J.D. (2006). Neuroeconomics: Cross-currents in research on decision-making. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 10 (3), 108–116. Soman, D., Ainslie, G., Frederick, S., Li, X., Lynch, J., Moreau, P., Mitchell, A., Read, D., Sawyer, A., Trope, Y.,Wertenbroch, K., & Zauberman, G. (2005). The psychology of intertemporal discounting: Why are distant events valued differently from proximal ones? Marketing Letters, 16 (3-4), 347–360. Stariolo, D. A. (1994). The Langevin and Fokker-Planck equations in the framework of a generalized statistical mechanics. Physics Letters A, 185, 262–264. Takahashi, T. (2005). Loss of self-control in intertemporal choice may be attributable to logarithmic time-perception. Medical Hypotheses, 65 (4), 691–693. Takahashi, T. (2006). Time-estimation error following Weber Fechner law may explain subadditive time-discounting. Medical Hypotheses, 67 (6), 1372–1374. Takahashi, T., Ikeda, K., & Hasegawa, T. (2007). A hyperbolic decay of subjective probability of obtaining delayed rewards. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 3, 52. Takahashi, T., Oono, H., & Radford, M.H.B. (2007). Empirical estimation of consistency parameter in intertemporal choice based on Tsallis’ statistics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 381 (15), 338–342. Trope, Y., & Liberman, N. (2003). Temporal construal. Psychological Review, 110, 403–421. Tsallis, C., Anteneodo, C., Borland, L., & Osorio, R. (2003). Nonextensive statistical mechanics and economics. Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, 324 (1-2), 89–100. Wanjiang, D., Green, L., & Myerson, J. (2002). Cross-cultural comparisons of discounting delayed and probabilistic rewards. The Psychological Record, 52 (4), 479–492. Watkin, T. L. H., Rau, A., & Biehl, M. (1993). The statistical mechanics of learning a rule. Review of Modern Physics, 65, 499–556. Wittmann, M., Leland, D.S., & Paulus, M.P. (2007). Time and decision making: Differential contribution of the posterior insular cortex and the striatum during a delay discounting task. Experimental Brain Research, 179 (4), 643–653. Wittmann, M., & Paulus, M.P. (2008). Decision making, impulsivity and time perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 12 (1), 7–12. Zak, P.J. (2004). Neuroeconomics. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London B: Biological Sciences, 359 (1451), 1737–1748. Zauberman, G., Kim, B.K., Malkoc, S., & Bettman, J.R. (2009). Discounting time and time discounting: Subjective time perception and intertemporal preferences. Journal of Marketing Research, 46 (4), 543-556. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/16814 |