The role of real and nominal variables in defining business cycles: dynamic properties of a hybrid model - an alternative view

Chirwa, Themba G. (2009): The role of real and nominal variables in defining business cycles: dynamic properties of a hybrid model - an alternative view.

Abstract

The paper provides an alternative view to the Real and New Keynesian business cycle theories. The paper focuses on the combination of both real and nominal variables in explaining the cyclical movements of business cycles. We propose using Vector Autoregressive (VAR) technique on the production function approach in order to empirically assess the relative importance of both real and nominal variables in defining the shape of a business cycle (or output gap). An economy-specific variable (inflation) is introduced in the production function and is used to control the severity, persistence and magnitude of a given real shock. The model employed is tested in four countries namely: United States of America, United Kingdom, Canada and Germany. The results show that indeed real and nominal variables play an important and major role in explaining movements in business fluctuations. The bulk of impulse responses given a real shock to the output gap may also be attributed to movements in nominal variables mainly as a result of inflationary movements. This economy specific parameter conveys the same message that Ragnar Frisch hypothesized in 1933 based on his ‘rocking-horse theory’. The paper thus provides policy makers to identify key choice variables to use when reducing the impact of shocks in a given economy within a specified period of time.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Business cycle; Vector autoregression; Impulse and propagation mechanisms; Hodrick-Prescott filter; Production function approach.
• Subjects: E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E32 - Business Fluctuations ; Cycles; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E3 - Prices, Business Fluctuations, and Cycles > E31 - Price Level ; Inflation ; Deflation; E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy

References

Akerlof, G. A. and J. L. Yellen (1985), ‘A Near-Rational Model of the Business Cycle with Wage and Price Inertia’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100, 823-838

Ball, L. and D. Romer (1987), ‘Are Prices too Sticky?’ Working Paper 2171, NBER, February

Ball, L., N. G. Mankiw and D. Romer (1988), The New Keynesian Economics and the Output-Inflation Trade Off, available at www.econturk.org/Turkisheconomy/9506.pdf

Blanchard, O. J. and N. Kiyotaki (1987), ‘Monopolistic Competition and the Effects of Aggregate Demand’, The American Economic Review, 77 (4), 647-666, September

Blanchard, O. J. and D. Quah (1989), ‘The Dynamic Effects of Aggregate Demand and Supply Disturbances’, American Economic Review, 79 (4), 655-673, September

Colander, D. (1992), ‘New Keynesian Economics in Perspective’, available at www.community.middlebury.edu/~colander/articles/New%20Keynesian%20Ec%20in%20Persp.pdf

Engle, R. F. and C. W. J. Granger (1987), ‘Cointegration and Error Correction: Representation, Estimation, and Testing’, Econometrica, 55, 251-276

Frisch, R. (1933), ‘Propagation and Impulse Problems in Dynamic Economics’, in Essays in Honor of Gustav Cassel, London: Allen and Unwin

Hicks, J. R. (1950), A Contribution to the Theory of the Trade Cycle, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Hodrick, R. J. and E. C. Prescott (1997), ‘Post-war U. S. Business Cycles: An Empirical Investigation’, Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, 29, 1-16

Johansen, S. and K. Juselius (1990), ‘Maximum Likelihood Estimation and Inferences on Cointegration – with applications to the demand for money’, Oxford Bulleting of Economics and Statistics, 52, 169-210

Johansen, S. (1991), ‘Estimation and Hypothesis Testing of Cointegration Vectors in Gaussian Vector Autoregressive Models’, Econometrica, 59, 1551-1580

Johansen, S. (1995), Likelihood-based Inference in Cointegrated Vector Autoregressive Models, Oxford: Oxford University Press

Keynes, J. M. (1936), The General Theory of Employment, Interest and Money, London: Macmillan

Kydland, F. E. and E. C. Prescott (1982), ‘Time to Build and Aggregate Fluctuations’, Econometrica, November

Kydland, F. E. and E. C. Prescott (1991), ‘The Econometrics of the General Equilibrium Approach to Business Cycles’, The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 93 (2), 161-178, June

Laidler, D. E. W. (1992), ‘The Cycle before New Classical Economics’, in M. Belongia and M. Garfinkel (eds.). The Business Cycle: Theories and Evidence, London: Kluwer Academie Publishers

Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1972), ‘Expectations and the Neutrality of Money’, Journal of Economic Theory, April Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1973), ‘Some International Evidence on Output-Inflation Tradeoffs’, American Economic Review, June

Lucas, R. E. Jr. (1987), Models of Business Cycles, Oxford: Basil Blackwell

Lucas, R. E. Jr. and L. A. Rapping (1969), ‘Real Wages, Employment and Inflation’, Journal of Political Economy, September/October

Mankiw, N. G. (1985), ‘Small Menu Costs and Large Business Cycles: A Macroeconomic Model of Monopoly’, The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 100 (2), 529-537, May

Mankiw, N. G. and R. Reis (2002), ‘Sticky Information versus Sticky Prices: a proposal to replace the New Keynesian Phillips Curve’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117, 1295-1328

Mikhail, O. (2004), ‘No More Rocking Horses: Trading Business Cycle Depth for Duration Using an Economy Specific Characteristic’, available at www.bus.ucf.edu/wp/Working%20Papers/2004/04-03Mikhail.pdf

Nelson, C. R. and C. I. Plosser (1982), ‘Trends and Random Walks in Macroeconomic Time Series: Some Evidence and Implications’, Journal of Monetary Economics, September Pfaff, B. and K. Taunus (2006), ‘VARS: S3 Classes and Methods for Estimating VAR and SVAR Models’, available at http://www.pfaffikus/de/VARS

Ramsey, P. M., (1986), ‘Increasing Returns and Long-Run Growth,’ Journal of Political Economy, 94, 1002-1037

Rebelo, S. (2005), ‘Real Business Cycle Models: Past, Present, and Future’, Economic Working Paper Series: Northwestern University

Samuelson, P. A. (1939), ‘Interactions between the Multiplier Analysis and the Principle of Acceleration’, Review of Economics and Statistics, May

Snowdon, B., H. Vane, and P. Wynarczyk (1994), A Modern Guide to Macroeconomics: An Introduction to Competing Schools of Thought, Edward Elgar: Cheltenham UK

Stock, J. H. and M. W. Watson (2001), ‘Vector Autoregressions’, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15 (4), 101-115, Fall

Summers, L. H. (1988), ‘Should Keynesian Economics Dispense with the Phillips Curve?’, in R. Cross (eds.), Unemployment, Hysteresis, and the Natural Rate Hypothesis, Basil Blackwell

Tinbergen, J. (1935), ‘Annual Survey: Suggestions on Quantitative Business Cycle Theory’, Econometrica, 3, 241-308, July

Tobin, J. (1980), ‘Are New Classical Models Plausible Enough to Guide Policy?’ Journal of Money, Credit and Banking, November

Turnovsky, S. J. (1999), ‘Knife-Edge Conditions and the Macrodynamics of Small Open Economies,’ available at http://www.econ.washington.edu/user/sturn/Melbourne_paper.pdf

Uhlig, H. (2005), ‘What are the Effects of Monetary Policy on Output? Results from an Agnostic Identification Procedure’, Journal of Monetary Economics, 52, 381-419