Globalization and wage premia: reconciling facts and theory

Strauss-Kahn, Vanessa (2003): Globalization and wage premia: reconciling facts and theory.

Abstract

This paper analyzes the e¤ect of globalization on wage premia by studying the interaction between trade costs, firms’ location decision, and relative demand for labor. It suggests that globalization, through vertical specialization and/or agglomeration, increases inequality in countries with a relative abundance of skilled workers in a way that is observationally equivalent to skilled-biased technological progress (i.e., joint increases in the wage premium and the within-industry skilled–unskilled employment ratio). This confirms the potential role of international trade in explaining the observed increase in wage inequality between skilled and unskilled workers that has occurred in most industrialized countries since the mid- 1970s. Calibration of the model supports this result. It shows that NAFTA has contributed significantly to the observed increase in the U.S. wage premium.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Agglomeration, Intermediate Inputs, Skilled/Unskilled Wages, Trade Liber- alization, Vertical Specialization.
• Subjects: F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F15 - Economic Integration; J - Labor and Demographic Economics > J3 - Wages, Compensation, and Labor Costs > J31 - Wage Level and Structure ; Wage Differentials; F - International Economics > F1 - Trade > F12 - Models of Trade with Imperfect Competition and Scale Economies ; Fragmentation

References

Acemoglu, D., 2000. “Technical Change, Inequality and Labor Market,” NBER working paper 7800.

Amiti, M. 2001. “Location of Vertically Linked Industries: Agglomeration versus Compar- ative Advantage,” CEPR discussion paper 2800.

Barro, R., Lee, J.-W., 2000. “International Data on Educational Attainment Updates and Implications,” NBER working paper 7911.

Berman, E., J. Bound and Z. Griliches, 1994, “Change in the Demand for Skilled Labor within U.S. Manufacturing: Evidence from the Annual Survey of Manufactures,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 109 (May): 367–98

Bound J., Johnson, G., 1992. “Changes in the Structure of Wages in the 1980s: An Evalu- ation of Alternative Explanations,” American Economic Review 82, 371–92.

Campa, J., Goldberg, L., 1997. “The Evolving External Orientation of Manufacturing: Evidence from Four Countries,” NBER working paper 5919.

Davis, D. R., Weinstein, D. E., 1998. “Economic Geography and Regional Production Structure: An Empirical Investigation,” NBER working paper 6093.

Davis, D.R., Weinstein, D.E., 2001. “Do Factor Endowments Matter for North–North Trade?” NBER working paper 8516.

Dixit, A., Stiglitz, J., 1977. “Monopolistic Competition and Optimum Product Diversity,” American Economic Review 67, 297–308.

Ethier, W., 1982. “National and International Return to Scale in the Modern Theory of International Trade,” American Economic Review 72, 389–405.

Feenstra, R., 1998. “Integration of Trade and Disintegration of Production in the Global Economy,” Journal of Economic Perspectives 12, 31–51.

Feenstra, R., Hanson, G., 1996a. “Foreign Investment, Outsourcing and Relative Wages,” In Feenstra, R.,Grossman, G., Irwin, D. (Eds.), Political Economy of Trade Policy: Essays in Honor of Jagdish Bhagwati. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, pp.89–127.

Feenstra, R., Hanson, G., 1996b. “Foreign Investment and Relative Wages: Evidence from Mexico’s Maquiladoras,” Journal of International Economics 42, 371–94.

Harrigan, J., 1993. “OECD Imports and Trade Barriers in 1983,” Journal of International Economics 35, 91–111.

Harrigan, J., 1998. “International Trade and American Wages in General Equilibrium, 1967–1995,” NBER working paper 6609.

Hummels, D., Ishii, J., Yi, K., 2001. “The Nature and Growth of Vertical Specialization in World Trade. Journal of International Economics 54, 75–96.

Katz, L., Loveman, G., Blanch‡ower, D., 1993. “A Comparison of Changes in the Structure of Wages in Four OECD Countries,” NBER working paper 4297.

Krugman, P., 1995. “Growing World Trade: Causes and Consequences,” Brooking Papers on Economic Activity 1, 327–77.

Krugman, P., Venables, A., 1995. “Globalization and the Inequality of Nations,” Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 857–80.

Lawrence, R., Slaughter, M., 1993. “International Trade and American Wages in the 1980s: Giant Sucking Sound or Small Hiccup?” Brookings Papers on Economic Activity (Micro- economics) 2, 161–226.

Machin, S., Ryan, A., Van Reenan, J., 1996. “Technology and Changes in Skill Structure: Evidence from an International Panel of Industries,” CEPR discussion paper 297.

Obstfeld, M., Rogo¤, K., 2000. “The Six Major Puzzles in International Macroeconomics: Is There a Common Cause?” NBER working paper 7777.

OECD [Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development], 1998. Employment Outlook.

Strauss-Kahn, V., 2001. “Does Globalization Participate in the French Within-Industry Shift Away from Unskilled Workers?” INSEAD working paper.

Torstensson, J., 1997. “Country Size and Comparative Advantage: An Empirical Study,” CEPR discussion paper 297 discussion paper 1554.

Venables, A., 1996. ”Equilibrium Locations of Vertically Linked Industries,” International Economic Review 37, 341–359.

Wood, A., 1994. “North-South Trade, Employment and Inequality” Oxford, U.K.: Oxford University Press.