Propuestas para mejorar el Federalismo Fiscal en Argentina: Un nuevo esquema para la distribución del Impuesto a las Ganancias

Bertello, Nicolas and Uña, Gerardo (2009): Propuestas para mejorar el Federalismo Fiscal en Argentina: Un nuevo esquema para la distribución del Impuesto a las Ganancias. Published in: Fundación Siena Website No. Publicación No. 8 (2009): 01-36.

Abstract

To promote and contribute to the discussion of fiscal federalism in Argentina, this paper presents a proposal to amend the distribution of the revenue from the Income Tax between the Nation and the provinces.

The proposal is based on the need to help reinvigorate the discussion on the distribution of federal resources. In recent years we have added new elements to the dynamics of fiscal federalism that in some cases reinforce problems that already exist and in some others, modify active aspects in the last and half decade. The provincial debt refinancing by the Nation after the crisis of 2001 - 2002, the changes in the fundraising composition pro to the National Government or reversion of the pension reform are examples of these changes.

Given the above, this paper takes a bounded approach to the Income Tax federal distribution, in contrast to an integral reform vision of the distribution of federal resources. In practice, this approach has produced few results to push for reform, both in times of acute financial constraints, as in periods of recovery and with governments of different political signs.

Income Tax, and prior to the partnership, we realize transfers to the pension system, the Suburban Fund and the ATN fund administered by the National Government. The terms of this distribution is a clear example of how changes in the economic, political and fiscal problems have deepened in the '90s for the allocation of federal resources and created new others. Virtually all such transfers are no longer justified or become outdated.

First, the reversion of the pension reforms of the nineties, with the elimination of private capitalization system in late 2008 has changed the revenue structure of the pension system, reversing in part the reasons that justified the yield of part of the provinces revenue to finance it. Today, ANSES surplus contrasts with the increasing deterioration of the provincial finances. Moreover, part of the surplus of ANSES is intended to finance the National Government, which in turn provides financial assistance to provinces. This contributes to a scheme that increases the dependence of the provinces of federal transfers and lessens their predictability for policy development. To this situation has also contributed, the change in the tax structure since 2002, with a tax increase with limited partnerships, increasing Nation resources to the detriment of the provinces.

Related to this, there is a fiscal situation deteriorated even more and with greater reliance on National Government funding, in the Province of Buenos Aires. Since the early '90s, recognizing a disadvantage situation in this province in the partnership scheme, it was set up Suburban Fund which was allocated 10% of the revenue from Income Tax. However, it was later established a fixed stop to this fund, which was never updated, now the Suburban Fund harms the Buenos Aires Province, because it would get more resources if the fund had a normal partnership.

Finally, from the Income Tax the 2% goes to Treasury posts fund (ATN), formally created in order that the nation attend the provinces in case of emergency. This instrument is no longer relevant. On the one hand, the ATN fund accumulates resources that are not distributed by an estimated amount of $ 8,500 million. Moreover, today are financial assistance programs and other discretionary transfers the mechanism by which the National Government transfers resources to several provinces.

With this in mind, we present a proposal to amend the federal distribution of Income Tax, adding resources to the provinces in general and a steal on the Province of Buenos Aires in particular. This will reduce transfers to the pension system, it eliminates the amount allocated to ATN and updating the Suburban Fund.

This proposal comes under the parliamentary treatment of the extension of several major taxes, among which include the Income Tax and seeks to contribute to this debate. Additionally, and beyond this situation, the work aims to highlight some aspects that justify the restatement of fiscal federalism in Argentina, adapted to a gradual approach of reform, aligned with current political possibilities.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• English Title: Proposals to improve the Fiscal Federalism in Argentina: A new scheme for the distribution of Income Tax
• Language: Spanish
• Keywords: fiscal federalism; Income tax; revenue; distribution; National Budget; resources; Suburban Fund; ATN fund; transfers; pension reforms; ANSES; crisis of 2001 - 2002; surplus
• Subjects: R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R5 - Regional Government Analysis > R50 - General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R1 - General Regional Economics > R10 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O1 - Economic Development > O10 - General; D - Microeconomics > D3 - Distribution > D30 - General; R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R0 - General; O - Economic Development, Innovation, Technological Change, and Growth > O5 - Economywide Country Studies > O54 - Latin America ; Caribbean; P - Economic Systems > P1 - Capitalist Systems > P10 - General

References

ANSES (2009), Informe del Fondo de Garantía de Sustentabilidad, Presentación al Consejo del FGS, Agosto. MIMEO

ANSES, Ministerio de Trabajo y Presidencia de la Nación (2008), SIPA – Reforma del Sistema Previsional Argentino, MIMEO. http://www.anses.gov.ar/prensa/informes/2008/SiPA.pdf.

Argañaraz, Nadin Et Al (2003): Federalismo Fiscal Argentino: Un análisis comparativo con Australia y Canadá. IERAL. Serie Política Fiscal, Documento de Trabajo Nro. 3.

Brodersohn, Mario (2008). Reformas en la Seguridad Social en Argentina y Chile: un contraste aleccionador. Informe Especial No 384, Econométrica. Cao Horacio (sin fecha)

Cao, Horacio (2007), Una nueva Perspectiva sobre la Coparticipación Federal de Impuestos. Presentado en el Cuarto Congreso Argentino de Administración Pública, Subsecretaría de la Gestión Pública, Jefatura de Gabinete de la Nación, Buenos Aires, agosto.

Castiñeira, Ramiro (2007). El impacto fiscal de la reforma previsional. Informe Especial No 376, Econométrica.

Cetrángolo, Oscar Et al (2002), Las Finanzas Públicas Provinciales: Situación Actual y Perspectivas, CEPAL, Series Estudios y Perspectivas 12, Buenos Aires.

Cetrángolo, Oscar y Carlos Grushka (2004). Sistema previsional argentino: crisis, reforma y crisis de la reforma. Serie Financiamiento del Desarrollo, Documento No 151, CEPAL. Disponible en web.

Cetrángolo, Oscar y Jiménez, Pablo (2004), Las Relaciones entre Niveles de Gobierno en Argentina, CEPAL, Revista No 84.

Dirección Provincial de Deuda y Crédito Público (2009), Informe de Gestión de la Deuda Pública, Ministerio de Economía de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Año VIII, Nro 22, Febrero.

Frigerio, Rogelio (2007), La Situación Fiscal de las Provincias, 10o Seminario de Federalismo Fiscal, Senado de la Nación, Economía y Regiones, Buenos Aires, Noviembre. MIMEO.

Losteau, Martín Et al (2003). Hacia un Federalismo Solidario. La coparticipación y el sistema previsional. Una propuesta desde la economía y la política. 1o edición, Buenos Aires. Tema Grupo Editorial.

Macón, Jorge (1998), Federalismo Fiscal y Descentralización en Argentina, Octubre.

Nicolini, Juan Pablo et al (2002), Decentralization, Fiscal Discipline in Subnational Governments and the Bailout Problem: The Case of Argentina. Inter American Development Bank, Research Network Working Paper #R-467, Washington D.C.

Otero, Gerardo Adrián et al (2004), Las Inequidades del Sistema Fiscal Federal Argentino, Documento de Trabajo, Ministerio de Economía de la Provincia de Buenos Aires.

Piffano, Horacio (1999). Descentralización fiscal y reforma tributaria federal en Argentina. Documento de Trabajo No 27. Centro de Estudios para el Desarrollo Institucional (CEDI). Buenos Aires.

Porto, Alberto y Sanguinetti, Pablo (1996). Las transferencias intergubernamentales y la equidad distributiva: el caso argentino. Serie de Política Fiscal 88. CEPAL. Naciones Unidas. Proyecto Regional de Descentralización Fiscal CEPAL/GTZ. Agosto.

Sanguinetti, Juan (2009), La Administración Tributaria de la Provincia de Buenos Aires: Un análisis desde una perspectiva comparada – Informe Final, PNUD - Proyecto de Desarrollo Institucional de la Agencia de Recaudación de la Provincia de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Septiembre.

Secretaría de Seguridad Social (2003), El Libro Blanco de la Previsión Social, Ministerio de Trabajo Empleo y Seguridad Social de la Nación, Buenos Aires, Marzo.

Tommasi, Mariano (2002), Federalism in Argentina and the Reforms of the 1990`s, Center for Research on Economic Development and Policy Reform, Document 69.

Uña, Gerardo, Cogliandro Gisell y Bertello Nicolás (2005) Concentración de Facultades del Poder Ejecutivo Nacional sobre el Presupuesto Nacional: Una Tendencia en Aumento. Revista ASAP No 39, Agosto.