Estimating Gravity Models of International Trade with Correlated Time-Fixed Regressors: To IV or not IV?

Mitze, Timo (2010): Estimating Gravity Models of International Trade with Correlated Time-Fixed Regressors: To IV or not IV?

Abstract

Gravity type models are widely used in international economics. In these models the inclusion of time-fixed regressors like geographical or cultural distance, language and institutional (dummy) variables is often of vital importance e.g. to analyse the impact of trade costs on internationalization activity. This paper analyses the problem of parameter inconsistency due to a correlation of the time-fixed regressors with the combined error term in panel data settings. A common solution is to use Instrumental-Variable (IV) estimation in the spirit of Hausman-Taylor (1981) since a standard Fixed Effect Model (FEM) estimation is not applicable. However, some potential shortcomings of the latter approach recently gave rise to the use of non-IV two-step estimators. Given their growing number of empirical applications, we aim to compare the performance of IV and non-IV approaches in the presence of time-fixed variables and right hand side endogeneity using Monte Carlo simulations, where we explicitly control for the problem of IV selection in the Hausman-Taylor case. The simulation results show that the Hausman-Taylor model with perfect-knowledge about the underlying data structure (instrument orthogonality) has on average the smallest bias. However, compared to the empirically relevant specification with imperfect-knowledge and instruments chosen by statistical criteria, simple non-IV rival estimators performs equally well or even better. We illustrate these findings by estimating gravity type models for German regional export activity within the EU. The results show that the HT specification tends to overestimate the role of trade costs proxied by geographical distance.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: Gravity model, Exports, Instrumental variables, two-step estimators, Monte Carlo simulations
• Subjects: C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C5 - Econometric Modeling > C52 - Model Evaluation, Validation, and Selection; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C2 - Single Equation Models ; Single Variables > C23 - Panel Data Models ; Spatio-temporal Models; C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C1 - Econometric and Statistical Methods and Methodology: General > C15 - Statistical Simulation Methods: General

References

Ahn, S.; Schmidt, P. (1999): ''Estimation of Linear Panel Data Models Using GMM'', in: Matyas, L. (Ed.): ''Generalized methods of moments estimation'', Cambridge.

Alecke, B.; Mitze, T.; Untiedt, G. (2003): ''Das Handelsvolumen der ostdeutschen Bundesländer mit Polen und Tschechien im Zuge der EU-Osterweiterung: Ergebnisse auf Basis eines Gravitationsmodells'' in: DIW Vierteljahrshefte zur Wirtschaftsforschung, Vol. 72, No. 4, pp. 565-578.

Alecke,B.; Mitze, M.; Untiedt, G. (2009): ''Trade-FDI Linkages in a System of Gravity Equations for German Regional Data'', Ruhr Economic Papers No. 84.

Alfaro, R. (2006): ''Application of the symmetrically normalized IV estimator'', Working Paper, Boston University, http://people.bu.edu/ralfaro/doc/sniv0602.pdf

Andrews, D. (1999): ''Moment Selection Procedures for Generalized Method of Moments Estimation'', in: Econometrica, Vol. 67, No. 3, pp. 543-564.

Andrews, D.; Lu, B. (2001): ''Consistent model and moment selection procedures for GMM estimation with application to dynamic panel data models'', in: Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 101, pp. 123-164.

Arellano, M.; Bond, S. (1991): ''Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations'', in: Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 58, pp. 277-297.

Arnold, J.; Hussinger, K. (2006): ''Export versus FDI in German Manufacturing: Firm Performance and Participation in International Markets'', Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper, No. 04/2006.

Atkinson, S.; Cornwell, C. (2006): ''Inference in Two-Step Panel Data Models with Time-Invariant Regressors'', Working paper, University of Georgia.

Baldwin, R.; Taglioni, D. (2006): ''Gravity for dummies and dummies for gravity equations'', NBER Working paper No. 12516.

Baltagi, B. (2008): ''Econometric Analysis of Panel Data'', 4. Edition, Chichester: John Wiley \& Sons.

Baltagi, B.; Bresson, G.; Pirotte, A. (2003): ''Fixed effects, random effects or Hausman Taylor? A pretest estimator'', in: Economic Letters, Vol. 79, pp. 361-369.

Baltagi, B.; Chang, Y. (2000): ''Simultaneous Equations with incomplete Panels'', in: Econometric Theory, Vol. 16, pp. 269-279.

Baum, C.; Schaffer, M.; Stillman, S. (2003): ''IVREG2: Stata module for extended instrumental variables/2SLS and GMM estimation'', Boston College, Statistical Software Component No. S425401.

Belke, A.; Spies, J. (2008): ''Enlarging the EMU to the East: What Effects on Trade?'', in: Empirica, 4/2008 , pp. 369-389.

Breuss, F.: Egger, P. (1999): ''How Reliable Are Estimations of East-West Trade Potentials Based on Cross-Section Gravity Analyses?'', in: Empirica, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 81-94.

Buch, C. ; Piazolo, D. (2000): ''Capital and Trade Flows in Europe and the Impact of Enlargement'', Kiel Working Papers No. 1001, Kiel Institute for the World Economy.

Caetano J.; Galego,A.; Vaz, E.; Vieira, C.; Vieira, I. (2002): ''The Eastern Enlargement of the Eurozone. Trade and FDI'', Ezoneplus Working Paper No. 7.

Caporale, G.; Rault, C.; Sova, R.; Sova, A. (2008): ''On the Bilateral Trade Effects of Free Trade Agreements between the EU-15 and the CEEC-4 Countries'', CESifo Working Paper Series No. 2419.

Disdier, A.; Head, K. (2008): ''The Puzzling Persistence of the Distance Effect on Bilateral Trade'', in: The Review of Economics and Statistics, Vol. 90(1), pp. 37-48.

Egger, P. (2000): ''A note on the proper econometric specification of the gravity equation'', in: Economics Letters, Vol. 66, pp. 25-31.

Eichenbaum, M.; Hansen, L.; Singelton, K. (1988): ''A Time Series Analysis of Representative Agent Models of Consumption and Leisure under Uncertainty'', in: Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol. 103, pp. 51.78,

Etzo, I.(2007): ''Determinants of interregional migration in Italy: A panel data analysis'', MPRA Paper No. 5307.

Feenstra, R. (2004): ''Advanced International Trade. Theory and Evidence'', Princeton.

Fidrmuc, J. (2008): ''Gravity models in integrated panels'', in: Empirical Economics, forthcoming.

Greene, W. (2010): ''Fixed Effects Vector Decomposition: A Magical Solution to the Problem of Time Invariant Variables in Fixed Effects Models?'', unpublished Working Paper, download from: http://pages.stern.nyu.edu/~wgreene.

Hansen, L. (1982): ''Large Sample Properties of Generalised Method of Moments Estimators'', in: Econometrica, Vol. 50, pp. 1029-1054.

Hausman, J. (1978): ''Specification tests in econometrics'', in: Econometrica, Vol 46, pp. 1251-1271.

Hausman, J.; Taylor, W. (1981): ''Panel data and unobservable individual effects'', in: Econometrica, Vol. 49, pp. 1377-1399.

Helpman, E.; Melitz, M.; Yeaple, S. (2003): ''Export versus FDI'', NBER Working Paper No. 9439.

Henderson, D.; Millimet, D. (2008): ''Is Gravity Linear?'', in: Journal of Applied Econometrics, Vol. 23, pp. 137-172.

Hong, H.; Preston, B.; Shum, M. (2003): ''Generalized Empirical Likelihood-Based Model Selection Criteria for Moment Condition Models'', in: Econometric Theory, Vol. 19, pp. 923-943.

Hsiao, C. (2003): ''Analysis of Panel Data'', 2.edition, Cambridge.

Im, K.; Ahn, S.; Schmidt, P.; Wooldridge, J. (1999): ''Efficient estimation in panel data models with strictly exogenous explanatory variables'', in: Journal of Econometrics, Vol. 93, pp. 177-203.

Jakab, Z.; Kovács, M.; Oszlay, A. (2001): ''How Far Has Trade Integration Advanced?: An Analysis of the Actual and Potential Trade of Three Central and Eastern European Countries", in: Journal of Comparative Economics'', Vol. 29, pp. 276-292.

Krogstrup, S.; Wälti, S. (2008): ''Do fiscal rules cause budgetary outcomes?'', in: Public Choice, Vol. 136(1), pp. 123-138.

Lafourcade, M.; Palusie, E. (2005): ''European Integration, FDI and the Internal Geography of Trade: Evidence from Western European Border Regions'', paper presented at the EEA congress in Amsterdam (August 2005).

Linders, G. (2005): ''Distance decay in international trade patterns: a meta-analysis'', ERSA 2005 conference paper ersa05p679.

Matyas, L. (1997): ''Proper Econometric Specification of the Gravity Model'', in: The world economy, Vol. 20(3), pp. 363-368.

Mundlak, Y. (1978): ''On the pooling of time series and cross-section data'', in: Econometrica, Vol. 46, pp. 69-85.

Murphy. K.; Topel, R. (1985): ''Estimation and Inference in Two-Step Econometric Models'', in: Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, Vol. 3, pp. 88-97.

Pagan, A. (1984): ''Econometric Issues in the analysis of regressions with generated regressors'', in: International Economic Review, Vol. 25.

Plümper, T.; Tröger, V. (2007): ''Efficient Estimation of Time Invariant and Rarely Changing Variables in Panel Data Analysis with Unit Effects'', in: Political Analysis, Vol. 15, pp. 124-139.

Sargan, J. (1958): ''The Estimation of Economic Relationships Using Instrumental Variables'', in: Econometrica, Vol. 26, pp. 393-415.

Schumacher, D.; Trübswetter, P. (2000): ''Volume and Comparative Advantage in East West trade'', DIW Discussion Paper No. 223.

Zwinkels, R.; Beugelsdijk, S. (2010): ''Gravity equations: Workhorse or Trojan horse in explaining trade and FDI patterns across time and space?'', in: International Business Review, Vol. 19, Issue 1, pp. 102-115.