Kox, Henk L.M. and Leeuwen, George van and Wiel, Henry van der (2010): Competitive, but too small - productivity and entry-exit determinants in European business services.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_24389.pdf Download (614kB) | Preview |
Abstract
The paper investigates whether scale effects, market structure, and regulation determine the poor productivity performance of the European business services industry. We apply parametric and nonparametric methods to estimate the productivity frontier and subsequently explain the distance of firms to the productivity frontier by market characteristics, entry- and exit dynamics and national regulation. The frontier is assessed using detailed industry data panel for 13 EU countries. Our estimates suggest that most scale advantages are exhausted after reaching a size of 20 employees. This scale inefficiency is persistent over time and points to weak competitive selection. Market and regulation characteristics explain the persistence of X-inefficiency (sub-optimal productivity relative to the industry frontier). More entry and exit are favourable for productivity performance, while higher market concentration works out negatively. Regulatory differences also appear to explain part of the business services' productivity performance. In particular regulation-caused exit and labour reallocation costs have significant and large negative impacts on the process of competitive selection and hence on productivity performance. Overall we find that the most efficient scale in business services is close to 20 employees and that scale inefficiencies show a hump-shape pattern with strong potential scale economies for the smallest firms and diseconomies of scale for the largest firms. The smallest firms operate under competitive conditions, but they are too small to be efficient. And since this conclusion holds for about 95 out of every 100 European business services firms, this factor weighs heavily for the overall productivity performance of this industry.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Competitive, but too small - productivity and entry-exit determinants in European business services |
English Title: | Competitive, but too small - productivity and entry-exit determinants in European business services |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | productivity; frontier models; scale; industry dynamics; regulation; European Union; business services |
Subjects: | L - Industrial Organization > L8 - Industry Studies: Services C - Mathematical and Quantitative Methods > C3 - Multiple or Simultaneous Equation Models ; Multiple Variables > C34 - Truncated and Censored Models ; Switching Regression Models L - Industrial Organization > L1 - Market Structure, Firm Strategy, and Market Performance R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R3 - Real Estate Markets, Spatial Production Analysis, and Firm Location > R38 - Government Policy |
Item ID: | 24389 |
Depositing User: | Henk L.M. Kox |
Date Deposited: | 12 Aug 2010 21:05 |
Last Modified: | 29 Sep 2019 12:44 |
References: | Abramovitz, M., 1956, Resource and Output Trends in the United States Since 1870, American Economic Review, 46 (May), pp. 5-23. Antonelli, C., 1999, The microdynamics of technological change, Routledge, London. Axtell, R., 2006, Firm Sizes: Facts, Formulae, Fables and Fantasies, Center on Social and Economic Dynamics Working Paper No.44, Brookings, Washington. Axtell, R., 2001, Zipf Distribution of U.S. Firm Sizes, Science, 293, pp.1818-1820. Baker, P., and I. Miles, 2008, Study on industrial policy and services, Commissioned by the European Commission (DG Enterprise), ECORYS, Brussels / Rotterdam. Barone, G. and F. Zingano, 2008, Service regulation and growth: evidence from OECD countries, Temi di Discussione #675, Banca d’Italia, Rome. Bartelsman, E. and M. Doms, 2000, Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata, Journal of Economic Literature, 83 (3), 569-594. Battese, G. and T. Coelli, 1995, A Model for Technical Inefficiency Effects in a Stochastic Frontier Production Function for Panel Data, Empirical Economics, 20 (2), 325-32. Bloch, H., G. Madden and S. Savage, 2001, Economies of scale and scope in Australian telecommunications, Review of Industrial Organization, 18 (2), pp. 219-227. Brown, C, J. Haltiwanger and J. Lane, 2006, Economic turbulence: is a volatile economy good for America?, University of Chicago Press, Chicago. Camacho, J. and M. Rodriguez, 2007, Integration and diffusion of knowledge-intensive services for industry performance, in: L. Rubalcaba and H. Kox (eds.), Business services in European economic growth, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke, 128-143. Cantner, U., 2007, Firms’ differential innovative success and market dynamics, Jena Economic Research Papers 2007-078, Jena. Caves, R., J. Khalilzadeh-Shirazi and M.E. Porter, 1975, Scale economies in statistical analyses of market power, The Review of Economics and Statistics, vol. 57 (2), pp. 133-40. Coelli, J., D. Prasada Rao, C. O'Donnell and G. Battese, 2005, An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis, Springer, New York. Copenhagen Economics, 2005, Economic Assessment of the Barriers to the Internal Market in Services, commissioned by the European Commission, Copenhagen/ Brussels. CSES, 2001, Barriers to trade in business services - Final report, Report commissioned by the European Commission, Centre for Strategy & Evaluation Services / European Commission, Brussels. De Wit, G., 2005, Firm size distributions - an overview of steady-state distributions resulting from firm dynamic models, International Journal of Industrial Organization, 23, 423-450. Diewert, E., 2005, Progress in service sector productivity management, International Productivity Monitor, 11, 57-69. Dixit, A. and J. Stiglitz, 1977, Monopolistic competition and optimum product diversity, American Economic Review, 67, 297-308. Djankov, S., R. La Porta, F. Lopez, and A. Shleifer, 2002, The regulation of entry, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117 (1), pp 1-37. Djankov, S., E. Glaeser, R. La Porta, F. Lopez-de-Silanes and A. Schleifer, 2008, The new comparative economics, World Bank / Harvard University, mimeo (unpublished). European Commission, 2003, The competitiveness of business-related services and their contribution to the performance of European enterprises, COM(2003) 747 final, Brussels. Foster, L., J. Haltiwanger and C. Krizan, 1998, Aggregate productivity growth: lessons from microeconomic evidence, NBER Working Paper 6803, NBER, Cambridge MA. Frisch, R., 1965, Theory of production, D. Reidel, Dordrecht. Grönroos, C. and K. Ojasalo, 2004, Service Productivity: towards a conceptualization of the transformation of inputs into economic results in services, Journal of Business Research, 57, 414 – 423. Guerrieri, P., and B. Maggi, 2005, Technology diffusion, services and endogenous growth in Europe: is the Lisbon strategy useful?, IMF Working Paper WP/05/103, IMF, Washington. Gust, C. and J. Marquez, 2002, International comparisons of productivity growth: the role of information technology and regulatory practices, International Finance Discussion Papers, Number 727, Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. Hempell, T., G. Van Leeuwen and H. van der Wiel, 2002, ICT, innovation and business performance in services: evidence for Germany and The Netherlands, OECD-DSTI, Paris. Johnson, N., S. Kotz and N. Balakrishnan, 1994, Continuous univariate distributions, John Wiley & Sons, New York. Jovanovic, B., 1982, Selection and the evolution of industry, Econometrica, 50, 649-670. Kumbhakar, S., S. Gosh, S. and J. McGuckin, 1991, A generalized production frontier approach for estimating determinants of inefficiency in US dairy firms, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 9, 279-286. Klapper, L., L. Laeven and R. Rajan, 2006, Entry regulation as a barrier to entrepreneurship, Journal of Financial Economics, 82 (3), 591-629. Kocsis, V., R. Lukach, B. Minne, V. Shestalova, N. Zubanov and H. van der Wiel, 2009, Relation between entry, exit and productivity, CPB Document No. 180, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague. Kox, H., 2004, The contribution of business services to aggregate productivity growth, in: G. Gelauff et al. (eds), Fostering productivity: patterns, determinant and policy implications, Contributions to Economic Analysis #263, Elsevier Science, Amsterdam, 243-264. Kox, H. and A. Lejour, 2006, The effect of the Services Directive on intra-EU trade and FDI, Revue Economique, 57 (4), 747-769. Kox, H., A. Lejour and R. Montizaan, 2004, The free movement of services within the EU, CPB Document 69, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis, The Hague. Leibenstein, H. (1966), Allocative Efficiency vs. X-Efficiency, American Economic Review, 56 (3), 392-415 Muller, E. and A. Zenker, 2001, Business services as actors of knowledge transformation: the role of KIBS in regional and national innovation systems, Research Policy, 30 (9), 1501-1516. Nicoletti, G. and S. Scarpetta, 2003, Regulation, Productivity and growth: OECD evidence, OECD Economic Department Working paper 347, Paris. Nordås, H and H. Kox, 2009, Quantifying regulatory barriers to services trade, OECD Trade Policy Working Paper No. 85, OECD, Paris. Olley, G. and A. Pakes, 1996, The dynamics of productivity in the telecommunications equipment industry, Econometrica, 64, pp. 1263-1297. Oulton, N., 2001, Must the growth rate decline? Baumol's unbalance growth revisited, Oxford Economic Review, 53, 606-627. Paterson, I., M. Fink, and A. Ogus, 2003, Economic impact of regulation in the field of liberal professions in different Member States - regulation of professional services, Institute for Advanced Studies, Vienna. Pels, E., P. Nijkamp and P. Rietveld, 2003, Inefficiencies and scale economies of European airport operations, Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 39(5), 341-361. Post, T., 1999, Finding the Frontier, Methodological Advances in Data Envelopment Analysis, Ph.D Thesis, Erasmus University, Rotterdam. Rajan, G. and L. Zingales, 1998, Financial Dependence and Growth, American Economic Review, 88 (3), 559-86. Rubalcaba, L. and H. Kox, 2007, Business services in European economic growth, Palgrave MacMillan, Basingstoke/ New York. Schreyer, P., 2001, Measuring productivity - measurement of aggregate and industry-level productivity growth: OECD manual, OECD, Paris. Schure, P. and R. Wagenvoort, 1999, Economies of scale and efficiency in European banking: new evidence, Economic and Financial Report 1999/01, European Investment Bank, Luxembourg Shy, O., 2001, The economies of network industries, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge. Silk, A. and E. Berndt, 2003, Scale and Scope Economies in the Global Advertising and Marketing Services Business, HBS Research Paper No. 03-10. Triplett, J. and B. Bosworth, 2004, Productivity in the US services sector: new sources of economic growth, Brookings Institution Press, Washington. Van Leeuwen, G., 2008, Innovation and performance - a collection of microdata studies, PhD dissertation, Technical University Delft. Vernon, R., 1966, International investment and international trade in the product cycle, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80, 190-207. Viitamo, E., 2007, Productivity of business services - towards a new taxonomy, Research Report #188, University of Technology, Lappeenranta (Finland). Zellner, A., J. Kmenta, and J. Drèze, 1966, Specification and Estimation of Cobb-Douglas Production Function Models, Econometrica, 34 (4), 784 – 795. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/24389 |