Sandi, H. and Pomonis, A. and Francis, S. and Georgescu, E. S. and Mohindra, R. and Borcia, I. S. (2007): Seismic vulnerability assessment: Methodological elements and applications to the case of Romania. Published in: Constructii , Vol. 3, No. 2/2008 (December 2008): pp. 5-17.
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_25724.pdf Download (782kB) | Preview |
Abstract
This paper is intended to present some studies undertaken in order to develop a seismic vulnerability estimation system to fit the needs of development of earthquake scenarios and of development of an integrated disaster risk management system for Romania. Methodological aspects are dealt with, in connection with the criteria of categorization of buildings, with the definition of parameters used for characterizing vulnerability, with the setting up of an inventory of buildings and with the calibration of parameters characterizing vulnerability. Action was initiated along the coordinates referred to in connection with the methodological aspects mentioned above. The approach was made, as far as possible, specific to the conditions of Romania. Some data on results obtained to date are presented.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Seismic vulnerability assessment: Methodological elements and applications to the case of Romania |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | seismic vulnerability, vulnerability estimation, earthquake scenarios, categorization of buildings, inventory of buildings, expected earthquake impact |
Subjects: | H - Public Economics > H5 - National Government Expenditures and Related Policies > H54 - Infrastructures ; Other Public Investment and Capital Stock D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D81 - Criteria for Decision-Making under Risk and Uncertainty Q - Agricultural and Natural Resource Economics ; Environmental and Ecological Economics > Q5 - Environmental Economics > Q54 - Climate ; Natural Disasters and Their Management ; Global Warming L - Industrial Organization > L7 - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction > L79 - Other A - General Economics and Teaching > A3 - Collective Works > A30 - General R - Urban, Rural, Regional, Real Estate, and Transportation Economics > R2 - Household Analysis > R20 - General Y - Miscellaneous Categories > Y8 - Related Disciplines > Y80 - Related Disciplines D - Microeconomics > D8 - Information, Knowledge, and Uncertainty > D83 - Search ; Learning ; Information and Knowledge ; Communication ; Belief ; Unawareness L - Industrial Organization > L7 - Industry Studies: Primary Products and Construction > L74 - Construction |
Item ID: | 25724 |
Depositing User: | CONSTRUCTII Journal |
Date Deposited: | 12 Oct 2010 20:21 |
Last Modified: | 28 Sep 2019 15:14 |
References: | [1] Aptikaev, F., 2005: “Instrumental seismic intensity scale”. Proc. Symp. on the 40-th anniversary of IZIIS, Skopje. [2] "The Romania earthquake of 4 March 1977". Editura Academiei, Bucharest. [3] Cismigiu, A., M. Manole, M. Mironescu, I.S. Borcia H. Sandi, M. Stancu, 1999: „Types of brick masonry structures of Romania for old and new buildings and special features of earthquake induced damage”. Proc. International Workshop on Measures of Seismic Damage to Masonry Buildings, Monselice, Italy, 1998. Seismic Damage to Masonry Buildings (ed. A. Bernardini), A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam/ Brookfield. [4] Colban, Gh., M. Manole, M. Mironescu, H. Sandi, 1999: „Procedures and statistical aspects of vulnerability estimates for buildings with masonry shear walls”. Proc. International Workshop on Measures of Seismic Damage to Masonry Buildings, Monselice, Italy, 1998. Seismic Damage to Masonry Buildings (ed. A. Bernardini), A. A. Balkema, Rotterdam/Brookfield. [5] Constantinescu, L.,.D. Enescu, 1985: „The Vrancea earthquakes, in a scientific and technological profile". Editura Academiei, Bucharest. [6] Dolce, M., 1984: „Evaluating damage probability matrices from survey data”. Proc. US/Italy Symp. on Building Repair and Retrofitting, Rome. [7] Georgescu, E. S., A., Pomonis, 2007: “The Romania earthquake of March 4, 1977 in terms of economic and social impact”. Proc. Symp. “Thirty Years from the Romania Earthquake of March 4, 1977”, UTCB, Bucharest. [8] Grünthal, G. (editor), 1998: “European Macroseismic Scale 1998”. Luxembourg: Cahiers du Centre Européen de Géodynamique et Séismologie, vol. 15. 1998. [9] Mironescu, M., A. Bortnowschi, 1983: „Methodology of evaluation of the earthquake protection level of existing structures". Constructii, 11. Bucharest. [10]Mohindra, R., V. Sokolov, S. Francis, F. Wenzel, A. Pomonis, 2007: „Probabilistic seismic hazard assessment for Romania considering intermediatedepth (Vrancea) and shallow (crustal) seismicity”. Proc. Symp. “Thirty Years from the Romania Earthquake of March 4, 1977”, UTCB, Bucharest. [11]Sandi, H., 1985: “Analysis of seismic risk for geographically spread systems”. Proc. 4-th International Conf. on Structural Safety and Reliability (ICOSSAR ’85), Kobe. [12] Sandi, H. (WG Convenor), 1986: “EAEE Working Group on Vulnerability and Risk Analysis for Individual Structures and for Systems. Report to the 8-th ECEE “. Proc. 8th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Lisbon. [13] Sandi, H., 1988. Consideration of the spectral content of ground motion in re-evaluation of the seismic intensity. Symp. S5 of the XXIst General Assembly, European Seismological Commission, Sofia. [14] Sandi, H., 1998: „A format for vulnerability analysis of damaged structures”. Proc. 11th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Paris. [15] Sandi, H., 2003: “Urban seismic Vulnerability: Between trees and forests". OAR – AICR Symp. on Earthquake Protection for the City of Bucharest, 2003. Symp. Bull. AICPS, 2, 2002 (issued 2003). [16] Sandi, H., 2007: “Some current challenges to the development of the regulatory basis of the earthquake resistant design”. Proc. Symp. “Thirty Years from the Romania Earthquake of March 4, 1977”, UTCB, Bucharest. [17] Sandi, H., F. Aptikaev, V. Alcaz, I. S. Borcia, A. Drumea, O. Erteleva, A. Roman, 2006: „A NATO project on deriving improved (instrumental) criteria for seismic intensity assessment”. Proc. 1st EuropeanConference on Earthquake Engineering and Seismology, Geneva. [18] Sandi, H. (WG Convenor), M. Dolce, A. W. Coburn, B. Goschy, 1990: „Report to the 9-th ECEE of EAEE/ WG 3, “Vulnerability and risk analysis” Proc. 9th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Moscow. [19] Sandi, H., I. Floricel, 1994: “Analysis of seismic risk affecting the exisring building stock”. Proc. 10th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Vienna. [20] Sandi, H., I. Floricel, 1998: „Some alternative instrumental measures of ground motion severity”. Proc. 11th European Conf. on Earthquake Engineering, Paris. [21] Sandi, H., V. Mârza, 1996: „Forecasting major Vrancea earthquakes”. Proc. XXVth General Assembly, European Seismological Commission, Reykjavik. [22] Whitman, R., C. A. Cornell, 1976: „Design”. Chapter IX in Seismic risk and engineering decisions (eds.: C. Lomnitz, E. Rosenblueth). Elsevier, Amsterdam – Oxford – New York. [23] IRS, 1971: “Scale of macroseismic intensities". STAS 3684-71. [24] MLPAT, 1992: „Code for the earthquake resistant design of residential, social – cultural and industrial structures, P.100 – 92). vol.11. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/25724 |