Papadamou, Stephanos and Siriopoulos, Costas (2008): Does the ECB Care about Shifts in Investors’ Risk Appetite?
Preview |
PDF
MPRA_paper_25973.pdf Download (280kB) | Preview |
Abstract
A key problem facing monetary policy makers is determining whether serious financial instability is present. Periods of financial instability are linked with low investors’ risk appetite (or in other words high risk aversion). Two different measures of investors’ risk aversion are used: (a) the implied volatility from the Eurostoxx 50 index (VSTOX) and (b) an index based on principal component analysis applied to risk premia of several stock portfolios in the eurozone area (12 countries) with different fundamental and size characteristics. By using an unrestricted VAR model and impulse response analysis for the period January 1999 to August 2007, our results show that a shock in the risk aversion indicator affects negatively future real activity in the eurozone in a similar way to an exchange rate shock. The ECB reacts significantly to a risk aversion shock by reducing the interest rate in order to provide liquidity. Moreover, assuming rational expectations and using a forward-looking specification of the Taylor rule, we found that investors’ risk aversion affects the ECB behavior as the leading indicator of future economic activity but not as an independent argument for the monetary policy. It views price stability and economic and financial stability as highly complementary and mutually consistent objectives to be pursued within a unified policy framework.
Item Type: | MPRA Paper |
---|---|
Original Title: | Does the ECB Care about Shifts in Investors’ Risk Appetite? |
Language: | English |
Keywords: | European Central Bank; monetary policy; Taylor rule; transmission mechanism; VAR model; GMM |
Subjects: | E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E5 - Monetary Policy, Central Banking, and the Supply of Money and Credit > E52 - Monetary Policy E - Macroeconomics and Monetary Economics > E4 - Money and Interest Rates > E44 - Financial Markets and the Macroeconomy G - Financial Economics > G0 - General > G00 - General |
Item ID: | 25973 |
Depositing User: | STEFANOS PAPADAMOU |
Date Deposited: | 19 Oct 2010 07:27 |
Last Modified: | 03 Oct 2019 04:51 |
References: | Amato, J. D., Laubach, T., 1999. The Value of Interest-Rate Smoothing: How the Private Sector Helps the Federal Reserve. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review 84, 47–64. Bernanke, B., Blinder, A., 1992. The Federal Funds Rate and the Channels of Monetary Transmission. American Economic Review 82, 901–921. Bernanke, B., Gertler, M., 1999. Monetary Policy and Asset Price Volatility. Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City Economic Review, 17–51. Chen, N.-F., 1991. Financial Investment Opportunities and the Macroeconomy. Journal of Finance 46, 529–554. Clarida, R., Gali, J., Gertler, M., 1998. Monetary Policy Rules in Practice: Some International Evidence. European Economic Review 42, 1033–1067. Cochrane, J., 2001. Asset Pricing. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Enders, W., 1995. Applied Econometric Time Series. John Wiley & Sons, New York. Engle, R., 1982. Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity with Estimates of the Variance of U.K. Inflation. Econometrica 50(4), 987–1008. Fama, E. F., French, K. R., 1992. The Cross-Section of Expected Stock Returns. Journal of Finance 47, 427–465. Fama, E. F., French, K. R., (1995) Size and Book-to-Market Factors in Earnings and Returns. Journal of Finance 50, 131–155. Fama, E. F., French, K. R., 1996. Multifactor Explanations of Asset Pricing Anomalies. Journal of Finance 51, 55–184. Fama, E. F., French, K. R., 1998. Value versus Growth: The International Evidence. Journal of Finance 53, 1975–1999. Fourcans, A., Vranceanu, R., 2002. ECB Monetary Policy Rule: Some Theory and Empirical Evidence. ESSEC Working Paper no. 02008, ESSEC Research Center, Cergy, France. Fuerst, M., 2006. Investor Risk Premia and Real Macroeconomic Fluctuations. Journal of Macroeconomics 28, 540–563. Gai, P., Vause, N., 2004. Risk Appetite: Concept and Measurement. Financial Stability Review, Bank of England, 127–136. Gerdesmeier, D., Roffia, B., 2004. Empirical Estimates of Reaction Functions for the Euro Area. Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, 140(I) 37-66. Goudert, V., Gex, M., 2006. Can Risk Aversion Indicators Anticipate Financial Crises? Financial Stability Review, Banque de France 9, 67–87. Hardouvelis, G. A., Wizman, T. A., 1992. The Relative Cost of Capital for Marginal Firms over the Business Cycle. Quarterly Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York (Autumn), 44–58. Haugen, R., 1995. The New Finance: The Case against Efficient Markets. Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, N. J. Kandel, S., Stambaugh, R. F., 1990. Expectations and Volatility of Consumption and Asset Returns. Review of Financial Studies 3, 207–232. Kumar, S., Persaud, A., 2002. Pure Contagion and Investors’ Shifting Risk Appetite: Analytical Issues and Empirical Evidence. International Finance 5 (3), 401–436. Lakonishok, J., Shleifer, A., Vishny, R., 1994. Contrarian Investment, Extrapolation, and Risk. Journal of Finance 49, 1541–1578. Lamont, O., 2000. Investment Plans and Stock Returns. Journal of Finance 55, 2719–2745. Leitemo, K., Soderstrom, U., 2005. Simple Monetary Policy Rules and Exchange Rate Uncertainty. Journal of International Money and Finance 24 (3), 481–507. Lettau, M., Ludvigson, S., 2002. Time-Varying Risk Premia and the Cost of Capital: An Alternative Implication of the Q Theory of Investment. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 31–66. Liew, J., Vassalou, M., 2000. Can Book-to-Market, Size, and Momentum be Risk Factors that Predict Economic Growth? Journal of Financial Economics 57, 221–245. McGuire, P., Schrijvers, M., 2003. Common Factors in Emerging Market Spreads. Quarterly Review, Bank for International Settlements, December, 65–78. Merton, R. C., 1973. An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model. Econometrica 41, 867–887. Mishkin, F., White, E., 2002. US Stock Market Crashes and their Aftermath: Implications for Monetary Policy. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper no. 8992 1050, Massachusetts Avenue Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. Orphanides, A., 2001. Monetary Policy Rules Based on Real-Time Data. American Economic Review 91, 964–985. Pastor, L., Stambaugh, R. F., 2001. The Equity Premium and Structural Breaks. Journal of Finance 56, 1207–1239. Patelis, A. D., 1997. Stock Return Predictability and the Role of Monetary Policy. Journal of Finance 52, 1951–1972. Peersman, G., Smets, F., 2001. The Monetary Transmission Mechanism in the Euro Area: More Evidence from VAR Analysis. European Central Bank Working Paper no. 91, Frankfurt am Main, Germany. Perron, P., Ng, S., 1996. Useful Modifications to Some Unit Root Tests with Dependent Errors and their Local Asymptotic Properties. Review of Economic Studies 63 (3), 435–465. Ross, S., 1976. The Arbitrage Theory of Capital Asset Pricing, Journal of Economic Theory.13 (3), 341-360 Rudebusch, G. D., 2002. Term Structure Evidence on Interest-Rate Smoothing and Monetary Policy Inertia. Journal of Monetary Economics 49, 1161–1187. Sauer, S., Sturm, J. E., 2007. Using Taylor Rules to Understand ECB Monetary Policy. German Economic Review 8, 375–398. Sims, C., 1980. Macroeconomics and Reality. Econometrica 48, 1–48. Sløk, T., Kennedy, M., 2004. Factors Driving Risk Premia. OECD Economic Department Working Paper no. 385, Paris, France. Taylor, J. B., 1993. Discretion versus Policy Rules in Practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy 39, 195–214. Thorbecke, W., 1997. On Stock Market Returns and Monetary Policy. Journal of Finance 52, 635–654. Thorbecke, W., 2000. Monetary Policy, Time-Varying Risk, and the Bond Market Debacle of 1994. Journal of Macroeconomics 22, 159–174. Ullrich, K., 2003. A Comparison between the Fed and the ECB: Taylor Rules. ZEW Discussion Paper no. 03-19. Mannheim. |
URI: | https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/id/eprint/25973 |