The history of the mainstream rejection of interdependent preferences

Drakopoulos, Stavros A. (2010): The history of the mainstream rejection of interdependent preferences.

Abstract

The notion of interdependent preferences has a long history in economic thought. It can be found in the works of authors such as Hume, Rae, Genovesi, Smith, Marx and Mill among others. In the 20th century, the idea became more widespread mainly through the works of Veblen and Duesenberry. Recently, an increasing number of theorists are interested in issues like reference income, relative consumption and positional goods which are all based on the concept of interdependent preferences. However, such preferences were never part of the corpus of orthodox theory. For instance, although Pareto and Marshall were aware of their existence, they rejected their incorporation into economic theory. There were various reasons for this rejection. The structure of mainstream economic methodology might be one reason. Another reason had to do with the theoretical implications of adopting interdependent preferences. The paper discusses the main historical aspects of this idea in relation to the mainstream resistance to incorporate it in orthodox economic theory.

• Item Type: MPRA Paper
• Language: English
• Keywords: preferences; positional goods; History of Economic Thought
• Subjects: D - Microeconomics > D1 - Household Behavior and Family Economics > D11 - Consumer Economics: Theory; B - History of Economic Thought, Methodology, and Heterodox Approaches > B0 - General > B00 - General

References

Ackerman, F. (1997) Consumed in Theory: Alternative Perspectives on the Economics of Consumption, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 31, pp. 651-64.

Akerlof, G and Yellen, J. (1990) The Fair Wage-Effort Hypothesis and Unemployment, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 105, 255-84.

Becker, G. (1976) The Economic Approach to Human Behavior, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Bruni, L. (2004) The ‘Happiness Transformation Problem’ in the Cambridge Tradition, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought, 11, 431-51.

Bruni, L (2007) The “Technology of Happiness” and the Tradition of Economic Science” in Bruni L. and Porta P.L (eds), (2007). Handbook of the Economics of Happiness, Cheletenham, UK: Edward Elgar.

Charness, G. and Grosskopf, B. (2001). Relative Payoffs and Happiness: An Experimental Study, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization , 45, 301–328.

Clark, A. and Oswald, A. (1996) Satisfaction and Comparison Income, Journal of Public Economics, 61, 359-381.

Clark, A.,Frijters, P. and Shields, M. (2008) Relative Income, Happiness and Utility: an Explanation for the Easterlin Paradox and Other Puzzles, Journal of Economic Literature, 46, 95-124.

Clower, R. (1951) Professor Duesenberry and Traditional Theory, Review of Economic Studies, 19, 165-78.

Cournot, A. A. 1838 [1927]. The Mathematical Principles of the Theory of Wealth (translated from Recherches sur les principes mathématiques de la théorie des richesses, by N. T. Bacon). New York: Macmillan.

Cowling, K. (2006) Prosperity, Depression and Modern Capitalism, Kyklos, 59, 369-381.

Cunynghame, H. (1892) Some Improvements in Simple Geometrical Methods of Treating Exchange Value, Monopoly, and Rent, Economic Journal, II, 35-52.

Drakopoulos, S. (1997) Origins and Development of the Trend Towards Value-free Economics, Journal of the History of Economic Thought vol. 19, 286-300.

Drakopoulos, S. (2008) The Paradox of Happiness: Towards an Alternative Explanation, Journal of Happiness Studies, 9, 302-315.

Drakopoulos, S. A. (forthcoming) The Concept of Comparison Income: An Historical Perspective, European Journal of the History of Economic Thought

Duesenberry, J S. (1949) Income, Saving and the Theory of Consumer Behaviour, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Dugger, W. (1985) The Analytics of Consumption Externalities, Review of Social Economy, 43:2, 212 — 233.

Edgell, S and Tilman, R. (1991) John Rae and Thorstein Veblen on Conspicuous Consumption: A Neglected Intellectual Relationship, History of Political Economy, 23, 731-43.

Foley, C. (1893) Fashion, The Economic Journal, 3, 458-94.

Frank, R. (1984) Interdependent Preferences and the Competitive Wage Structure, Rand Journal of Economics, 15, 510-520.

Frank, R. (1985) Choosing the Right Pond, New York: Oxford University Press.

Frey, B. and Stutzer A. (2002) What Can Economists Learn from Happiness Research?, Journal of Economic Literature, 40, 402-435.

Galbraith, J. K. (1969) The Affluent Society, Second Edition, New York

Harbaugh, R. (1996) Falling Beyond the Joneses: Relative Consumption and the Growth-Savings Paradox, Economics Letters, 53, 297-304.

Hirsch, F. (1976) Social Limits to Growth, Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Hollander, S. (1984) Marx and Malthusianism: Marx’s Secular Path of Wages, American Economic Review, 74, 139-51.

Hume, D (1736) Treatise of Human Nature, reprinted in Selby-Bigge, vol.1 (1897)

Leibenstein, H. (1950) Bandwagon, Snob, and Veblen Effects in the Theory of Consumers’ Demand, Quarterly Journal of Economics 64, 183–117.

Longfield, M. (1834) [1971] Lectures on Political Economy, in R.D. Collison Black (ed) The Economic Writings of Mountifort Longfield, New York: A.M.Kelley.

McCormick. K. (1983) Duesenberry and Veblen: The Demonstration Effect Revisited, Journal of Economic Issues, 17, 1125-1129.

McLure M. (2009) Pareto and Pigou on Ophelimity Utility and Welfare: Implications for Public Finance, The University of Western Australia Economics Discussion Papers, No 0913, 1-30.

Marshall, A. (1890) [1920) Principles of Economics (8th edition), London: Macmillan.

Marx, K. 1849 [1977] Wage Labour and Capital, in Collected Works of Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, volume 9. London: Lawrence & Wishart, 197-228.

Mason, R. (1995) Interpersonal Effects on Consumer Demand in Economic Theory and Marketing Thought, 1890-1950, Journal of Economic Issues, Vol. 29, 871-81.

Mason, R (2000) The Social Significance of Consumption: James Duesenberry’s Contribution to Consumer Theory, Journal of Economic Issues, vol. 34, 553-572.

Mayhew, A. (2002) All Consumption is Conspicuous, in R. Fullbrook (ed.) Intersubjectivity in Economics, London: Routledge, 43-55.

Mill, John Stuart. 1874 [1969]. Three Essays on Religion, in Collected Works of John Stuart Mill, volume X, edited by J. M. Robson. Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 369-489.

Modigliani, F. and Brumberg, R. (1954) Utility Analysis and the Consumption Function: An Interpretation of Cross Section Data”, in K. Kurihara (ed.) Post Keynesian Economics , New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press, 388-436.

Pareto, V. (1896-97) [1971] Corso di Economia Politica [Cours d’Économie Politique]. Torino: Unione Tipographico-Editrice Torinese.

Pareto, V. (1918) Economia sperimentale. Giornale degli Economisti e Rivista di Statistica, 28(57): 1-18, reprinted in OEuvres Complètes 22: Écrits Sociologiques Mineurs, Edited by Giovanni Busino, Genéve: Librairie Droz, 1980: 719-43.

Pigou, A. C. (1903) Some Remarks on Utility. Economic Journal, 13 (49): 58-68.

Pigou, A. C. (1910) Producers' and Consumers' Surplus. Economic Journal 20 (79):358-370.

Postlewaite, A. (1998) The Social Basis of Interdependent Preferences, European Economic Review, 42, 779-800

Rabbin, M (2002) A Perspective on Psychology and Economics, European Economic Review, 46, (4), pp. 657-685.

Rae, J. (1834) Statement of Some New Principles on the Subject of Political Economy, New York: A.M.Kelley, 1964.

Schneider, M. (2007) The Nature, History and Significance of the Concept of Positional Goods, History of Economics Review. No. 45: 60-81.

Selby-Bigge, L. A. (1897) British Moralists 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Seligman, B. (1969) The Impact of Positivism on Economic Thought, History of Political Economy, 1, pp.256-78.

Senior, N. (1836) [1965] An Outline of the Science of Political Economy, New York: A.M.Kelley.

Smith, A. (1759) [1976] The Theory of Moral Sentiments, edited by D.D. Raphael, A.L.Macfie, Oxford: Clarendon Press.

Steuart, J. Sir (1767) [1966] An Inquiry into the Principles of Political Oeconomy, edited by A.Skinner, Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd.

Veblen, T. (1899) [1934] The Theory of the Leisure Class: An Economic Study of Institutions. New York: Random House.

Whately, R. (1832) [1968] Introductory Lectures on Political Economy, New York: A.M.Kelley.